Cheerful office workers laugh share takeaway pizza together

(© fizkes - stock.adobe.com)

COLUMBIA, Mo. — It’s no secret that women have faced a tougher path career-wise than men across numerous industries and fields, enduring lower pay and fewer opportunities for advancement. Now, researchers from the University of Missouri-Columbia find even using humor in the workplace is more challenging for women than their male co-workers.

Topics like equal pay and opportunities in the workplace across genders are obviously more important than humor or jokes. However, study authors note that humor is without a doubt an integral aspect of “office culture.” It’s a near-universal tactic that employees and managers use to defuse tense moments and lighten moods at work.

The study explains that the way in which co-workers perceive a female employee’s joke depends on a variety of factors. These include the woman’s “status” in the company and whether she directed her joke at a man or woman.

Are jokes really funnier depending on who’s telling them?

Christopher Robert, MU associate professor and interim dean of the Trulaske College of Business, put together this project to investigate how people react to both male and female humor in the workplace. More specifically, study authors hoped to determine if gender and status in the workplace affects how people both perceive and receive jokes.

In all, the team surveyed 92 college students after reading about a variety of workplace scenarios in which men and women made humorous comments. Each scenario was different, with some featuring a male “humorist” (person making the joke) and others involving a female humorist. Other differences included if the humorist held a high status in the hypothetical office and the gender of the joke’s “target.” Additionally, some jokes were more aggressive, while others were friendlier.

Each college student noted how “foolish” they perceived the humorist to be in each situation. For example, one scenario described a group of hospital workers discussing some problems that resulted in a patient death. A female nurse begins to stutter, causing another employee to interrupt with an attempt at a joke, poking fun at the fact that she can’t find her words.

Researchers tweaked the office status and gender of the joke teller in this scenario several times. For some participants, the humorist was a woman in a position of power, while others heard the same joke from a male employee of lower standing in the company.

When high-status men, low-status men, and high-status women made aggressive humorous comments, participants generally received them positively. If the joke teller was a low-status woman, however, the group saw the employee’s humor as more foolish.

Don’t rush to judgment after one joke

The research team also made it a point to consider how the gender of the joke’s target influenced perceptions of the joke teller.

“Women who used humor directed toward a man were seen as positive,” Robert says in a university release. “But when a high-status woman used humor directed toward a woman of lower status in the workplace, she was seen as negative and was judged as more foolish.”

In summation, study authors suggest people hold off on judging anyone, man or woman, too harshly based on a single joke or off-hand comment.

“This research amplifies the fact that we even have inherent biases that influence how we view people who are using humor,” Robert concludes. “If someone is questioning someone’s sense of humor, they should ask themselves, ‘Would I be making this same judgment if the person using the humor looked more like me?’”

The findings appear in the Journal of Managerial Psychology.

About John Anderer

Born blue in the face, John has been writing professionally for over a decade and covering the latest scientific research for StudyFinds since 2019. His work has been featured by Business Insider, Eat This Not That!, MSN, Ladders, and Yahoo!

Studies and abstracts can be confusing and awkwardly worded. He prides himself on making such content easy to read, understand, and apply to one’s everyday life.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor