Poor attribution here. We’re told the names of one author and the journal in which it appeared, but not identity as to what the formal background of the researchers were. On it’s face it looks like shabby research with over-reaching conclusions, and consequent questionable ethics regarding the labeling of subjects who would score one way or the other on such a test.
I was taught when I was a kid that only fools laugh in public. Yeah, I know, different times, when people cared about decency.
So apparently I’m a sycopath, unlike all the idiots on Fakebook/YouTube who broascast themselves laughing for no reason whatsoever, or worse yet, hurting/torturing other people.
It’s important to tie alleged mental conditions to objective measures like brain waves and cerebral blood distribution because diagnoses have usually been subjective, made by people with social authority nobody dares challenge.
Whenever a so-called mental problem comes to attention, lately autism for example, cases multiply much like witches during a medieval panic.
So the mal-educated forced drugged compliant giggling bevis and buttheads are “normal”, “healthy” and to be emulated? Meh!
Go ahead little minions … pull my finger!
I’ll yank that baby… No fear Here !
No LAUGHING !
2/3rds of the test group already had psychopathy risk factors!!! SO real bad study.
That’s silly. A psychopath simply waits to see if other people are laughing. Then he knows its time to laugh
or time to hack them to pieces…
FU Paths are the evolutionary apex, you stupid emotional morons jerked around like women.
Poor attribution here. We’re told the names of one author and the journal in which it appeared, but not identity as to what the formal background of the researchers were. On it’s face it looks like shabby research with over-reaching conclusions, and consequent questionable ethics regarding the labeling of subjects who would score one way or the other on such a test.
It’s not new that most of these types of studies aren’t able to be replicated. Calling it junk science is an insult to junk science.
I find no humor in this.
Progressives’ idea of science. Urgh.
I was taught when I was a kid that only fools laugh in public. Yeah, I know, different times, when people cared about decency.
So apparently I’m a sycopath, unlike all the idiots on Fakebook/YouTube who broascast themselves laughing for no reason whatsoever, or worse yet, hurting/torturing other people.
“So apparently I’m a sycopath, ”
Now THAT’s FUNNY!
I laughed my a­ss off when Trump won on Nov 8. I saw thousands of sycopaths crying like p­issies that night and ever since.
” I saw thousands of sycopaths”
I dont care who you are, THAT’S funny!
I don’t see what’s so gaddammed funny about it.
so many people did not read the article or are too retarded to understand it.
it is talking about CONTAGIOUS LAUGHTER If you do not know what that means, you may or may not be a psychopath, but you are a legit idiot.
But look at how many ‘sychopaths’ actually read the article?
What a waste of these poor children’s time…
La ramera es
fácil de comprar a difíciles de engañar. – Christopher Columbus
That sounds like every lesbian I’ve ever met.
The government NEEDS to use this as a data point to place people on a watch list, no fly list, and firearms purchase ban.
(((steingold)))
[…] Laughter Not Contagious For Kids Who May Be Psychopaths, Study Finds […]
It’s important to tie alleged mental conditions to objective measures like brain waves and cerebral blood distribution because diagnoses have usually been subjective, made by people with social authority nobody dares challenge.
Whenever a so-called mental problem comes to attention, lately autism for example, cases multiply much like witches during a medieval panic.