Do cancer-resistant naked mole rats hold the secret to long, healthy lives?

LIVERPOOL, England — In the oncology and, more broadly, the biology world, the naked mole rat is exceptionally fascinating. Native to East Africa, these wrinkly, hairless — some might say unsightly — creatures have long lifespans for small rodents, and they’ve been found to be remarkably resistant to cancer. Now a new study may have uncovered the reason why, pointing to cellular processes that boost their unparalleled resistance.

Typically, the cancer rate in animals is the same as or higher than that of humans. But, after several decades of being studied by scientists, very few naked mole rats were found to develop cancerous tumors. What’s more, naked mole rats live up to about 32 years, as much as 10 times longer than other rodents.

Naked mole rat
Naked mole rats are intriguing for researchers for a variety of reasons: they have the longest life span of rodents (average lifespan is 30 years), they are resistant to a variety of age-related diseases such as cancer, and they tend to remain fit and active until very advanced ages. The Gorbunova Lab at the University of Rochester studies these rodents in the hopes of unraveling their unique anti-cancer properties. (University of Rochester photo / J. Adam Fenster)

To help understand why, an international group of researchers studied the naked mole rat to see if it possessed the anti-cancer mechanism known as cellular senescence. This process helps protect against the spread of the disease by stopping cell division when cells divide too quickly and become out of control, which leads to the development of cancerous tumors. In other animals, such as mice, senescence actually hastens the aging process, leading to shorter life spans, because cell division is halted.

“In humans, as in mice, aging and cancer have competing interests,” explains co-author Vera Gorbunova, a biology professor at the University of Rochester, in a news release. “In order to prevent cancer, you need to stop cells from dividing. However, to prevent aging, you want to keep cells dividing in order to replenish tissues.”

Prior research showed that older mice were far stronger when researchers tested what would happen when senescent cells were removed. This led scientists to wonder how naked mole rats’ cells might be different compared to other rodents because of their long, generally cancer-free lives. Perhaps, they thought, these animals evolved to not have senescent cells at all.

The authors found that the naked mole rats did in fact have these unique cells and that the senescence process is also the same as in mice. However, they noticed distinct features exclusive to the mole rats’ senescent cells themselves that they they think contribute to their long lives and cancer resistance.

“In naked mole rats, senescent cells are better behaved,” says Gorbunova. “When you compare the signals from the mouse versus from the naked mole rat, all the genes in the mouse are a mess. In the naked mole rat, everything is more organized. The naked mole rat didn’t get rid of the senescence, but maybe it made it a bit more structured.”

Adds Dr. Joao Pedro De Magalhaes, a co-author of the University of Liverpool’s Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease: “In addition, naked mole rat cells are more resistant to DNA damage. Therefore, one hypothesis is that the way naked mole rats are better able to cope with damage to their genome is essential for their longevity and cancer resistance.”

So as scientists across the globe work feverishly to develop various cancer-fighting solutions, it may be that the secret to immunity lies in a tiny, hairless rodent.

The full study was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Follow on Google News

About the Author

Ben Renner

Writer, editor, curator, and social media manager based in Denver, Colorado. View my writing at

The contents of this website do not constitute advice and are provided for informational purposes only. See our full disclaimer


  1. In my novel, Fragment, I discuss an entirely different theory of senescence that involves animals needing to age and die before they have any opportunity for cross-generational breeding. Or, put another way, animals that do not have either a social or genetic obstacle to cross-generational breeding would die out in short order. In this theory, naked mole-rats have a social obstacle (unlike other rodents) to cross-generational breeding (namely they have one designated “Queen” much like termites or bees) and therefore never needed to have a truncated life span to preserve their genetic integrity over generations.

      1. Well, they do, comparatively. Termite queens, queen bees and naked mole-rats all have extremely long life spans – there is no danger that their offspring will have cross-generational parents, so they don’t have to be replaced with each generation.

    1. That sounds very interesti..
      “BAAAAAhahahaha……I almost made it…..HAAAAHahahaha… sides hurt….”

      1. Well, the idea is being taken quite seriously by several, you know, scientists who specialize in the subject of senescence who contacted me. Scientists from Oxford, Harvard, you know, lightweights like that. Who are you?

  2. That’s not true, it’s the purple frogs than bring you the promise of a million years.

  3. I was just saying last night, I’m counting on the Naked Mole Rats to make my life better.
    Of course, that’s the name of a local rock band. I like their music.

Comments are closed.