Comments on “Sandra Bullock leads list of actors for earnings per SECOND on screen in Oscar-nominated movies”

  1. Carl says:
    03/08/2023 at 3:10 AM

    What’s the criteria for this list. If true why does Cruise have twice the bank account than her.

    Reply
  2. rametindallas says:
    03/08/2023 at 3:29 AM

    How much, per second, was Marlon Brando paid for ‘Superman’?

    Reply
  3. Bob Smith says:
    03/08/2023 at 7:55 AM

    And that’s just to cover the plastic surgery costs per year! 🙂 (but seriously, I just watched “Bullet Train”, and saw her in another movie not long ago and she looks like a mannequin)

    Reply
  4. matt says:
    03/08/2023 at 8:00 AM

    table cell padding?

    Reply
  5. alpha1six says:
    03/08/2023 at 10:17 AM

    I’m glad for her. She seems to be a nice person.

    Reply
  6. Kaiser says:
    03/08/2023 at 11:34 AM

    This is a bizarre analysis. For Sandra Bullock, you’ve asserted that because she’s on the screen for 62% of the film, that she is solely responsible for 62% of the box office revenue. Even if that were true, the box office revenue isn’t hers. She may have a share of it, however her earnings would better be described by how much she was compensated divided by how many seconds she worked on the film.

    Reply
  7. James Rogers says:
    03/08/2023 at 1:41 PM

    Whoopi Goldberg?

    Reply

Leave a Reply on “Sandra Bullock leads list of actors for earnings per SECOND on screen in Oscar-nominated movies”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *