EXETER, England — Plants may appear still and lifeless to a degree, but they’re far craftier than you might believe. A new study found that many plants use the same camouflage strategies as animals to avoid damage and protect themselves.
The review of research by scientists from the University of Exeter and the Kunming Institute of Botany (Chinese Academy of Sciences) say techniques such as blending into a natural background have many of the same benefits to plants as they do to animals.
“It is clear that plants do more than entice pollinators and photosynthesize with their colours – they hide in plain sight from enemies too,” says Martin Stevens, a professor with Exeter’s Centre for Ecology and Conservation, in a release. The authors found that both plants and animals use several types of methods for camouflaging: background matching to blend in with their environment; disruptive coloration, which are markings designed to distort their shape; masquerade, in which plants take on the appearance of something else that a predator might otherwise ignore; and decoration, or acquiring camouflaging material from the environment.
“From ‘decoration’, where they accumulate things like dust or sand on their surface, to disruptive coloration, they use many of the same methods as animals to camouflage themselves. We now need to discover just how important a role camouflage has in the ecology and evolution of plants,” says Stevens.
Since plants need chlorophyll, the substance that turns them green, to live, changing their colors to anything else comes as a cost.
“Animal camouflage has provided scientists with arguably the best examples of evolution in action,” says Stevens. “It has been widely studied since the first pioneers of evolutionary biology, but relatively little research has been done into plant camouflage. Plants give us a fascinating parallel way of understanding how evolution works.”
The paper, published in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution, is entitled: “Plant camouflage: ecology, evolution, and implications.”
So irritating when people anthropomorphize plants. They aren’t using “tricks,” they’re just sitting there being what they are. Like a stone. They do not develop strategies.
Yeah, plants hate it when you do that.
Poison Ivy like to hide under other vines…I do know that
P.L.M. plant lives matter
plants have feelings too, hug a liberal
Plants are so smart that they are running for posts in the Democrat Party and winning the nominations. Fern and Ivy are more highly regarded that Hillary.
“Well, sir, I’m not a potted plant. I’m here as the lawyer. That’s my job.”–Brendan Sullivan.
Sounds like a half-baked paper. It’s seems more likely that some “scientists” are trying to earn a living by attempting to get another grant. Without including UV studies, the rest of that “research” is of little value.
>“Animal camouflage has provided scientists with arguably the best examples of evolution in action,”
I’ve always been curious about the intermediate stages of this. Imperfect camouflage is not camouflage at all, so I wonder what the intermediate steps would be.
Aha! Plants are like Theresa May pretending not to be a vegetable. I wish the plants better success.
I feel like we learned this in middle school back in the 1980s… But maybe it’s news.
Oh, plants can be real jerks, believe you me!
Call any vegetable
I hate the Drudge so much. Go find something to do you mind-numb idiots.