(Photo by Jerry Kiesewetter on Unsplash)

PROVO, Utah — Words have the power to build communities and dissolve barriers. So it’s no surprise that in an era marked by vitriolic Twitter wars and media upheaval, they also have the capacity to divide us.

Politicians often turn to violent or loaded language to garner new supporters. But, according to a new study, this approach only intensifies the current political divide.

Political protest
A new study finds that politicians make an already tense political climate even worse when using “violent” words during speeches. (Photo by Jerry Kiesewetter on Unsplash)

The research, conducted by professors from Brigham Young University professors and Louisiana State University professor, reveals that when politicians use violent language they pump up their supporters, naturally, but simultaneously increase polarization with voters who oppose them.

To reach their conclusion, the authors had “Republicans and Democrats read political statements on policy issues, then measured their support for these policies,” according to a university news release. Subjects read statements using words like “fight” or “battle” while others preached less violent terms such as “effort” and “work” to hammer home similar points.

BYU professor Joshua Gubler discovered that the terminology, symbolic or not, drove already distant partisans further apart.

“Even if it’s metaphorical, and everyone knows it, there’s something that happens when you frame things in terms of battle or war that has real-world consequences,” he explains.

A heightened sense of media backfire and sensationalism likely plays a critical role in certain metaphors sticking and not sticking with audiences. While journalists use violent language to play up conflict, Gubler says politicians should not only choose their words wisely, but narrow their audiences.

Nathan Kalmoe, the study’s co-author from LSU, suggests politicians implement a “micro-targeting” approach. The process requires more focused marketing and outreach. Politicians can reserve their “call to action” approach for specific email campaigns.

“If you can restrict your use of that language or the reception of that language to people that are just on your side, then you have the ability to push in one direction on political issues,” he says.

In an increasingly divisive climate, politicians can be most effective when they use their words to unify rather than excite, the authors believe.

Creating more thoughtful, less polarizing dialogue across party lines seems doubtful. However, politicians have the opportunity to reach a wider audience using language that is more inclusive.

The full study was published in September in the journal Political Communication.

About Conor Mcnamara

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink


Chris Melore


Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor


  1. Sharp says:

    Interesting the most use of violent speech is by climate activists. No wonder that has become divisive