(left) A composite portrait of the least rare features of the Bored Ape Yacht Club. (right) A composite portrait of the most rare features of the Bored Ape Yacht Club. (CREDIT: Stevens Institute of Technology)

HOBOKEN, N.J. — Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are all the rage right now. Like cryptocurrency, these unique digital images can skyrocket in value, with some costing collectors thousands and even millions of dollars. While rarer NFTs generally become much more valuable, a new study finds rarity isn’t everything in this digital marketplace. In fact, the sheer demand for rare NFTs can actually destroy their value.

“Because NFT trading records are public, they offer a remarkable chance for us to look at why people perceive certain things as valuable, and how those changes over time,” says Jordan Suchow, a cognitive scientist at Stevens Institute of Technology, in a university release.

In this study, the team examined a set of NFTs called the “Bored Ape Yacht Club.” Just like a stamp collection, this NFT set contains 10,000 computer-generated cartoon ape images, each with different accessories, clothing, and fur colors.

The more unique the Bored Ape is, the rarer the image becomes. Meanwhile, more common apes hold less value on the NFT exchanges.

“It’s a bit like stamp collecting: the stamps all look the same, so if there’s a printing error or some other rare feature that sets a stamp apart, people will pay far more for it,” Suchow explains.

How ‘rare’ is rare when everything is rare?

The study finds that when the Bored Ape NFTs arrived, apes with the rarest features quickly skyrocketed in value and every collector was looking for them. However, this actually backfired for people looking to invest in these images.

Researchers found that because rarer NFTs were more valuable, they also became more visible — essentially making them much more common.

“Today, a newcomer to Bored Ape trading sees these rare apes everywhere and perceives them to be much more common than in fact they are,” Suchow explains. “That creates a puzzle: how can people be expected to learn about a new category when their experience of that category is dominated by the rarest examples?”

The researcher likens it to someone wanting to learn about dogs. The best way would be to simply go to a dog park and see all the different breeds. In the NFT world, on the other hand, collectors did the equivalent of going to an experimental breeder and looked at dog breeds you wouldn’t normally see in the real world.

To test this theory, the team picked out the rarest Bored Ape NFTs and compared their findings to the values of those images over time. While the rarity had a strong link to value when the Bored Ape collection first arrived, that link completely disappeared as new collectors started trading these NFTs.

“We’ve shown that rarity can become self-defeating — if you want to sustain value, you need to make sure that people don’t only see the rarest items in a given category,” Suchow says.

Rethinking how to invest in NFTs

Study authors say this could lead to a redesign of the NFT marketplaces and cause investors to actually place less value on rare images.

The study also showed that certain features of these images lost value faster than others. For example, apes with unusually colored backgrounds retained their value better than others. Meanwhile, those with different color fur dropped in value much faster.

“The exciting thing here is that we’ve revealed a general principle: that demand for rarity is self-defeating,” Suchow concludes. “That should be very broadly applicable, so the big question now is whether we can observe this effect in other categories, too.”

The team is presenting their findings at the Cognitive Science Society Conference.

About Chris Melore

Chris Melore has been a writer, researcher, editor, and producer in the New York-area since 2006. He won a local Emmy award for his work in sports television in 2011.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink


Chris Melore


Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor


  1. Philip Perington says:

    Kinda like fools buying cloud formations that look like Jesus or Wylie Coyote chasing the Roadrunner.

  2. brian says:

    to quote someone brilliant.. “It’s a hustle”

  3. Vox Veritatis says:

    Next thing you know, some crackpot will pay boatloads for a crucifix dipped in urine, or a ‘likeness’ of the Madonna in elephant dung.

    Wait! What!?!?

  4. John Smith says:

    NFT’s are by far and away the dumbest thing to be introduced to society since TikTok.