So, we Conservatives are ‘science deniers’ if we don’t agree with a consensus of scientists spouting some computer model driven blather about man made climate change? Since when does a consensus make something true? What about the facts? What if Galileo went along with the ‘consensus’ of scientists at the time who thought the Earth was the center of the universe? How about the facts that this cabal of so-called scientists keep getting caught manipulating the actual climate data to suit their ‘consensus’? Just today I read where folks at NOAA are altering the records for this winter to make things not look so cold. So yes, if Conservatives remain skeptics on this issue I would hope all rational people would not only see why but also employ their own healthy dose of skepticism.
I don’t believe it.
It is not science denying to dispute that co2 is changing the climate. Wanna talk about denial? Liberals deny that an unborn human is a human.
So, we Conservatives are ‘science deniers’ if we don’t agree with a consensus of scientists spouting some computer model driven blather about man made climate change? Since when does a consensus make something true? What about the facts? What if Galileo went along with the ‘consensus’ of scientists at the time who thought the Earth was the center of the universe? How about the facts that this cabal of so-called scientists keep getting caught manipulating the actual climate data to suit their ‘consensus’? Just today I read where folks at NOAA are altering the records for this winter to make things not look so cold. So yes, if Conservatives remain skeptics on this issue I would hope all rational people would not only see why but also employ their own healthy dose of skepticism.
The science shows that social science isn’t science.
Just kidding.
Mostly.