Security data and smartphone security – 3d rendering

(© Production Perig - stock.adobe.com)

BATH, United Kingdom — Consumers have become increasingly fearful of what information they may be unknowingly sharing with apps like TikTok, but it turns out many don’t quite understand the features that give them more control over it all. A new study by a team at the University of Bath’s School of Management, which included 312 participants, reveals that 43 percent of smartphone users are confused or unclear about what app tracking actually means.

Respondents commonly mistook it to mean that it helps to give them a better app experience or that it’s crucial for the app to work. In reality, app tracking is intended to help companies deliver targeted advertising to their users.

“We asked people about their privacy concerns and expected to see people who are concerned about protecting their privacy allowing fewer apps to track their data, but this wasn’t the case,” says Hannah Hutton, postgraduate researcher from the University of Bath’s School of Management. “There were significant misunderstandings about what app tracking means. People commonly believed they needed to allow tracking for the app to function correctly.”

“Some of the confusion is likely to be due to lack of clarity in wording chosen by companies in the tracking prompts, which are easy to misinterpret. For example, when ASOS said ‘We’ll use your data to give you a more personalized ASOS experience and to make our app even more amazing’ it’s probably no surprise that people thought they were opting for additional functionality rather than just more relevant adverts,” Hutton adds in a university release.

Online privacy, cyber security
Cybersecurity (© Urupong – stock.adobe.com)

When an iPhone user first opens an app, a pop-up asks whether they want to allow for activity tracking across other apps. The choices are either “Ask App Not to Track” or “Allow,” as per Apple’s App Tracking Transparency framework introduced in April 2021. For Android users, tracking consent can be found in their phone settings. If people choose to opt out of tracking, app and website use on their device won’t be traced by the company anymore, and their data won’t be used or shared for advertising purposes.

Interestingly, 24 percent of participants thought that this meant that their location would be tracked, not that their app and website use would be traced. For delivery apps like Deliveroo, or health and wellness apps, people were often under the impression that location data was necessary for the app to function correctly.

You’d think that since over half of participants (51%) were reporting concern about privacy and safety, that there would be less tracking acceptance. However, this research tells a much different story.

“This research further exposes how most consumers are not aware of how their digital data is being used. Everyday millions of us share information with tech companies and while some of this data is essential for these services to function correctly, other data allows them to generate money from advertising revenue. For example, Meta predicted that they would lose $10 Billion from people rejecting tracking,” explains study co-author David Ellis, a Professor of Behavioral Science.

Based on these findings, the team suggests that companies start to close this gap by adding an explanatory sentence to help users understand why their information is being requested in order to enhance transparency efforts.

“While people are now familiar with the benefits of having PIN numbers and facial recognition to protect our devices, more work needs to be done so people can make transparent decisions about what other data is used for in the digital age,” Ellis concludes.

The findings are published in The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

You might also be interested in:

About Shyla Cadogan, RD

Shyla Cadogan is a DMV-Based acute care Registered Dietitian. She holds specialized interests in integrative nutrition and communicating nutrition concepts in a nuanced, approachable way.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor