CHICAGO — Oncologists looking for highly-accurate, but not highly-expensive methods to diagnose lung cancer in patients may need not look any further than their local dog breeder community. That’s because a new study finds that beagles are capable of successfully detecting the disease by scent, a major breakthrough in identifying the specific biomarkers of the disease.

Researchers with the American Osteopathic Association say the dogs’ remarkable accuracy may lead to a safe, affordable, and effective mass cancer screening alternative in the future.

The beagles were chosen for their enhanced sense of smell, even compared to other dog breeds. They were able to differentiate between blood serum samples taken from patients suffering from malignant lung cancer and those who were healthy with 97% accuracy.

“We’re using the dogs to sort through the layers of scent until we identify the tell-tale biomarkers,” says lead author Thomas Quinn, professor at Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, in a statement. “There is still a great deal of work ahead, but we’re making good progress.”

The researchers are also working on another segment of the study that will involve the beagles sniffing out lung, breast, and colorectal cancer from patients’ breath samples. They say that this study could be the first step on the path of developing an over-the-counter screening test, similar to a pregnancy test, that could detect lung cancer early enough to be treated.

“Right now it appears dogs have a better natural ability to screen for cancer than our most advanced technology,” says Quinn. “Once we figure out what they know and how, we may be able to catch up.”

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death for men and women worldwide. More than 200,000 people in the U.S. are diagnosed with lung cancer every year.

The study was published in the Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

About Ben Renner

Writer, editor, curator, and social media manager based in Denver, Colorado. View my writing at

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink


Chris Melore


Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor