Study: Being ugly might actually be a good thing when it comes to your bank account

LONDON — Good news if you’ve been told you’re either “very attractive” or “very ugly” — there’s a decent chance you earn more money than those around you, according to a study.

Researchers at the London School of Economics and the University of Massachusetts have been able to somewhat dispel a pervasive theory regarding attractiveness, commonly referred to as a “beauty premium” or the “ugliness penalty.” Previous studies have found that those who are good-looking command higher wages in their employment. This phenomenon has been seen in a wide range of professions, from business to law.

It turns out that people aren’t necessarily discriminated against because of their appearance, the researchers determined.

For their analysis, Satoshi Kanazawa and Mary Still, the study’s co-authors, examined a dataset pulled from a popular survey looking at adolescents, the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, also known as “Add Health.” The survey is notable in that it measures physical attractiveness for a given individual in four installments over a period of 13 years, doing so on a five-point scale.

In their analysis, Kanazawa and Still write that while more attractive individuals often out-earned their less attractive peers, this was often due to the presence of other qualities. Those qualities being smarter, healthier, calmer, more extroverted, and more conscientious.

“Physically more attractive workers may earn more, not necessarily because they are more beautiful, but because they are healthier, more intelligent, and have better personality traits conducive to higher earnings,” says Kanazawa in a statement.

Attractiveness can be beneficial either way, for some

Interestingly, those who were categorized by Add Health as being “very unattractive” were also higher earners. They always outearned those who were deemed “merely unattractive,” and in some cases made more money than individuals of average and above-average attractiveness.

The finding that those on the far end of either side of the beauty spectrum make a better living was likely skipped over in previous studies because individuals less attractive than average were all lumped into one category.

In addition, few studies have examined all of the combined factors that Kanazawa and Still took into account.

The study is published in the Journal of Business and Psychology.


  1. The reason why being ugly is better for your bank account if you are a man is that you’ll never be able to attract a woman and therefore won’t have to worry about whether she only wants you for your bank account, nor will you ever have to worry about being taken to the cleaners when, not if, she decides it’s time to cash out and file for divorce.

    I’m an ugly guy and I can confirm that what I’m saying is 100% true.

  2. True, if you have a job opening and there are two people with equal qualifications do you pick the ugliest or prettiest? Sure… people like looking at ugly people all day.

  3. Look at Eric Schitt of Google fame for example. Very successful – yet disgusting to look at. Mark Cuban, how bout those ears. Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, the list goes on and on and on.

  4. .
    Ugly people may be successful but I don’t listen to them because they don’t know what they are talking about.
    I get all my advice from pretty Hollywood actors.

  5. This really depends on your occupation. Cover Model? Ugly Cover Model…… I bet who makes more out of those two…. Cindy Crawford made a good living out of being beautiful.


    An ugly woman
    walks into a shop with her two kids.

    The shopkeeper asks “Are they twins”?

    The woman says “No, he’s 9 and she’s 7.

    Why? Do you think they look alike?”

    “No,” he replies “I just can’t believe you got laid twice”!

  7. Depends on your definition of ‘ugly’. Most people are probably pretty normal looking, and a lot of people will change depending on the day (sleep, mood, etc…). There are very few people who are just flat out ‘ugly’ with no change of redemption.

    Plus, a lot of jobs don’t require you ever meeting the customer, so as long as you don’t offend your co-workers, who cares?

  8. Psychology is an irreproducible custom-fit fraud, p < 0.001. Human Resources hires pleasant mediocrities – drinking buddies – to avoid risk. This effectively staffs Sales & Marketing. It is lethal in math, engineering, science, technology, and research where mediocrity (diversity, equal opportunity, social promotion) is a vice of the doomed..

    If you need bleeding edge triumph you hire autism, Jews, Asians, and East Indians with fat university GPAs. Yeah, they're gonna be ugly, unkempt, and socially vile. Look at your spreadsheets, and smile.

  9. Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi? If you can’t be a good example then at least you can be a horrible warning. ; )

  10. Social engineers engaged in nonsensical social engineering… want you to believe attractive people are generally smarter, healthier, calmer, more extroverted, and more conscientious. Attractiveness is largely genetic… any other genetic characteristics that someone made those claims about would be rightfully run out of town on a rail.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *