Crime Scene – Police Line Tape

(© aijohn784 - stock.adobe.com)

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — There are certain crimes, such as sexual assault or child abuse, that immediately elicit a visceral reaction. In many of these cases, it comes to light that the perpetrator’s family or friends did absolutely nothing to report them to police once they became aware of their actions, and some even helped their loved ones cover up the crimes. While most people’s reaction to these stories is they would never fail to report such a crime, a new University of Michigan study finds that you may feel differently if it’s your own kin or close friend.

Researchers say that, in fact, people are much less likely to report crimes such as thievery, blackmail, or groping when a family member or close friend is the guilty party.

Perhaps even more troubling, the study concludes that as the severity of a crime increases, people actually become more protective of their loved ones. At the end of the day, most people just don’t want to sacrifice their relationship with the guilty party, regardless of society’s standards. Researchers say this finding was universal ever after accounting for factors like gender, political beliefs, personal beliefs, and even level of disgust.

For example, a mother discovers her son has been stealing from the elderly. While the mother is naturally ashamed and disgusted by her son’s actions, she will nonetheless work to protect her son from being discovered and convicted.

“We were really taken aback to see that most people predict that they will protect those close to them even in the face of heinous moral infractions,” comments study co-lead author Aaron Weidman, a psychology research fellow, in a release.

Weidman and his team utilized data collected from over 2,800 people across 10 previous studies. They looked to see if participants’ would be more or less likely to report acts of theft and sexual harassment depending on if the perpetrator was a stranger or a loved one. In one scenario, subjects were asked to imagine they had just been asked by a police officer if they had any information on a crime they had witnessed. Participants said they would be willing to lie, and subsequently break the law themselves, in order to protect a loved one. Conversely, if the imagined perpetuator was a stranger, participants said they wouldn’t hesitate to turn the individual in to law enforcement, and even ostracize them socially.

After looking into possible psychological explanations for these findings, researchers say that many people tell themselves they will discipline their loved one themselves, so there is no need to get formal law enforcement involved. This acts as a way for the individual to still consider themselves “moral,” while also maintaining their relationship with the guilty party.

“Loyalty is a powerful motivator that, under certain circumstances, can override other virtues like honesty.” says Walter Sowden, the study’s other lead author.

The research team also conducted two additional experiments, in which they asked participants to consider morally reprehensible crimes from a third-party perspective. When subjects took this approach, they were more likely to make an ethical decision and report a guilty loved one.

The study is published in the scientific journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

About John Anderer

Born blue in the face, John has been writing professionally for over a decade and covering the latest scientific research for StudyFinds since 2019. His work has been featured by Business Insider, Eat This Not That!, MSN, Ladders, and Yahoo!

Studies and abstracts can be confusing and awkwardly worded. He prides himself on making such content easy to read, understand, and apply to one’s everyday life.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor