Excellent study, although it omits flexitarians. The point of resource use though is very important and must lead to a stepped USER PAYS FOOTPRINT charges, where everyone has their lifestyle measured and premiums are added to all products, depending on one’s use of resources.
These extra payments can fund LGA based Ecology Productivity work, where Earth Care is a needed response to overuse. This is a result of population pressure exceeding the holding capacity and natural regeneration of Earth. We have to be taught to do more with less, so prepare for public education campaigns on the benefits of minimalism and certain consumption. Net Zero for producers only is not enough. The consumer should be held accountable!
Excellent study, although it omits flexitarians. The point of resource use though is very important and must lead to a stepped USER PAYS FOOTPRINT charges, where everyone has their lifestyle measured and premiums are added to all products, depending on one’s use of resources.
These extra payments can fund LGA based Ecology Productivity work, where Earth Care is a needed response to overuse. This is a result of population pressure exceeding the holding capacity and natural regeneration of Earth. We have to be taught to do more with less, so prepare for public education campaigns on the benefits of minimalism and certain consumption. Net Zero for producers only is not enough. The consumer should be held accountable!
Deforestation is CONSTANT to raise cattle? Why would that be? The pastures already exist. I would love to hear an explanation from anyone.