If you combine Quality of Services and Budget per Capita, the 5 worst cites are:
150. Cleveland, OH
149. Flint, MI
148. Chattanooga, TN
147. Hartfort, CN
146. Chicago, IL.
These rankings are useless. Budget per Capita? So a spendthrift city that wastes taxpayers’ money would be ranked high, wouldn’t it? Quality of Services; there’s no explanation of how the quality of a city service is evaluated, let alone whether the right services are being provided.
Those city are the worst run cities because the people in charge are incompetent, they don’t any idea how to run anything. They don’t even have had the experience of selling and orange on the street.
This is a terrible comparison and the article lacks context. There is no control for size, complexity or equity. Comparing Rutland, VT to New York City, NY is just stupid. I’m not saying that NYC is well run, but the statistics just aren’t valid. It’s apples to cucumbers.
Hmmm, I wonder what they all have in common? It couldn’t be that they’ve been run by the democrat/socialist/communist party for decades could it? Naw, they’re not interested in total control of the masses and remaining in power no matter what it takes, they only want everybody to be equal…in poverty.
I am not surprised by this list all. San Francisco used to be a great city but it has been ruined by incompetent politicians. But these politicians will read this article and dismiss it as wrong or cite some irrelevant statistic to show why there city is really much better.
They paid someone to do this study? I could have named the top ten simply by the amount of violence and the poor quality of life. I.E. Democrat run cities. In my hometown of Milwaukee for example it has been more than 100 years since there has been a Republican mayor.
The article title is about the worst run but the story only shows a list of the best run. Link the BAD list first. Don’t make people have to search for links. Well written minus the lack of a worst run listing.
Democrats have run this country’s big cities into the ground.
If legacy media did it’s job we’d not have to continually endure stories of this nature. Sacrificing major cities in the name of “good liberals” is NOT working. My home town; Seattle, has gone to total crap. Been 50 years since an “R” ran this state. I’m embarrassed to call it home and am making big plans to soon leave. Swallowing that pride is never an option, as it must NOT taste very good.
If you combine Quality of Services and Budget per Capita, the 5 worst cites are:
150. Cleveland, OH
149. Flint, MI
148. Chattanooga, TN
147. Hartfort, CN
146. Chicago, IL.
These rankings are useless. Budget per Capita? So a spendthrift city that wastes taxpayers’ money would be ranked high, wouldn’t it? Quality of Services; there’s no explanation of how the quality of a city service is evaluated, let alone whether the right services are being provided.
Those city are the worst run cities because the people in charge are incompetent, they don’t any idea how to run anything. They don’t even have had the experience of selling and orange on the street.
Gee look at that the three worst cities are all run by Democrats and they are held as great cities in the Liberal mind. Why does that not surprise me.
This is a terrible comparison and the article lacks context. There is no control for size, complexity or equity. Comparing Rutland, VT to New York City, NY is just stupid. I’m not saying that NYC is well run, but the statistics just aren’t valid. It’s apples to cucumbers.
Fortunately, most of the cities at the bottom of the list are in states that will continue to allow abortion without restriction. Jes sayin’.
NO SHOCKER Here…..
All three of these cities have been run (in the ground) by the DEMOGOGUE party……
For DECADES !
What was the algorithm that combined these two metrics? There doesn’t seem to be a simple weighting.
Hmmm, I wonder what they all have in common? It couldn’t be that they’ve been run by the democrat/socialist/communist party for decades could it? Naw, they’re not interested in total control of the masses and remaining in power no matter what it takes, they only want everybody to be equal…in poverty.
I am not surprised by this list all. San Francisco used to be a great city but it has been ruined by incompetent politicians. But these politicians will read this article and dismiss it as wrong or cite some irrelevant statistic to show why there city is really much better.
They paid someone to do this study? I could have named the top ten simply by the amount of violence and the poor quality of life. I.E. Democrat run cities. In my hometown of Milwaukee for example it has been more than 100 years since there has been a Republican mayor.
The article title is about the worst run but the story only shows a list of the best run. Link the BAD list first. Don’t make people have to search for links. Well written minus the lack of a worst run listing.
Democrats have run this country’s big cities into the ground.
No surprise there. They are all run by demrats.
If legacy media did it’s job we’d not have to continually endure stories of this nature. Sacrificing major cities in the name of “good liberals” is NOT working. My home town; Seattle, has gone to total crap. Been 50 years since an “R” ran this state. I’m embarrassed to call it home and am making big plans to soon leave. Swallowing that pride is never an option, as it must NOT taste very good.
Gee…what a coincidence, the worst cities are run by Dems. Country circling the drain thanks to build back better Joe.
Socialists ruin cities, that should be the title.