annoying music

Credit: Antonio Guillem on Shutterstock

Music is subjective. General popularity rarely translates to universal enjoyment.

In A Nutshell

  • Sabrina Carpenter’s “Sugar Talking” and “Tears” have a 46% chance of irritating listeners, topping 2025’s most annoying songs list despite her Grammy-winning year
  • SeatPick measured annoyance using four factors: repetition (30%), brightness/shrillness (20%), harmonic dullness (20%), and filler words like “yeah” and “ooh” (20%), plus a 10% baseline
  • TikTok viral hit “Dame Un Grrr” by Fantomel and Kate Linn leads the platform’s most annoying songs at 45.7%, having inspired over 1.2 million user videos
  • High annoyance scores don’t predict commercial failure; what researchers identify as “annoying” often represents the catchy, repetitive hooks that make songs memorable

Despite a banner year that included Grammy wins and industry accolades, emerging pop sensation Sabrina Carpenter may have managed to annoy a listener or two as well. Two tracks from her album Man’s Best Friend have a 46% chance of irritating listeners, according to an analysis examining the year’s most popular music releases.

Carpenter’s “Sugar Talking” and “Tears” earned the dubious distinction of being 2025’s most annoying songs. Researchers from the ticketing search engine SeatPick.com examined popular tracks from Apple Music and official charts, measuring qualities like repetition, high-pitched tones, unchanging harmonies, and meaningless filler words to calculate each song’s annoyance potential.

While 2025 has been celebrated for record-breaking releases and viral hits, some tracks have sparked debate over their repetitive or grating qualities.

Lady Gaga’s “The Dead Dance” secured third place with a 45.8% annoyance rating. BTS member Jimin’s solo track “Who” followed closely at 45.5%. Rounding out the top five was “Beautiful People” by David Guetta and Sia at 45.2%.

The Science Behind Musical Irritation

SeatPick created an “annoyingness index” that breaks down each song into four measurable components, plus a baseline factor. Repetition carries the most weight at 30% of the total score, detecting looping hooks and repeated melodic patterns that listener research links to fatigue. Brightness measures 20%, identifying harsh, high-frequency sounds that create a piercing sensation.

Harmonic dullness accounts for another 20% of the score, flagging songs with static or unchanging chord progressions. Filler density takes the final 20%, calculating the proportion of non-semantic syllables like “yeah,” “uh,” “la,” and “ooh” compared to actual lyrical content. A 10% baseline factor rounds out the formula.

Each track receives scores from 0 to 1 for the four components. These are combined using the weighted formula (including the 10% baseline) and scaled to create a final score between 0 and 10, then converted to a percentage. Higher percentages indicate greater annoyance potential.

Audio files were normalized and segmented before analysis, with high-overlap time windows detecting repeated fragments. Parallel spectral analysis measured frequency profiles to identify harsh or tiring sound characteristics.

Top 10 Most Annoying Songs Of 2025

RankSongArtistAlbumLikelihood people would find the song annoying (%)
=1Sugar TalkingSabrina CarpenterMan’s Best Friend46%
=1Tears Sabrina CarpenterMan’s Best Friend46%
3The Dead Dance Lady GagaThe Dead Dance45.8%
4Who JiminMUSE45.5%
5Beautiful People David Guetta and SiaBeautiful People45.2%
6Make Believe Luke Dean and Omar+Make Believe45.1%
7Just Keep Watching Tate McRaeF1 The Album44.7%
8Dreamin Dom Dolla and Daya[Released as a Single]44.6%
9Azizam Ed SheeranPlay44.1%
10       The Days    Chrystal and          NOTION   [Released as a Single]    44%

TikTok’s Most Grating Viral Hits

Among trending TikTok songs, “Dame Un Grrr” by Fantomel and Kate Linn topped the annoyance charts at 45.7%. The track’s relentless hooks and high-energy beats have inspired over 1.2 million user-generated videos on the platform.

“She Twerkin” by Ca$h Out claimed second place at 44.1%. “ACE UP” by BubaJuice and “Illegal” by PinkPantheress tied for third at 44% each.

Jess Glynne’s “Hold My Hand” landed in seventh place at 42.1%. The track gained widespread attention through a Jet2holidays advertisement before being featured in over 3.4 million TikTok videos throughout the year.

Clean Bandit and Zara Larsson’s “Symphony” scored 43.1%, while Nicki Minaj and 2 Chainz’s “Beez In The Trap” registered 42.1%. Kehlani’s “Folded” rounded out the top ten at 42%.

Sabrina Carpenter
Two tracks from Sabrina Carpenter’s 2025 album Man’s Best Friend had a 46% chance of annoying listeners. (Credit: lev radin on Shutterstock)

When Chart Success Meets Listener Fatigue

Carpenter’s placement at the top of the annoyance rankings arrives during what has otherwise been a career-defining year. She took home the Grammy Award for Best Pop Solo Performance and earned iHeartRadio’s Pop Artist of the Year honor. Her streaming numbers remain strong, and social media engagement continues to climb despite the high annoyance metrics.

Lady Gaga similarly enjoyed a successful 2025, winning Best Pop Duo Performance at the Grammys for “Die With a Smile” alongside Bruno Mars. That collaboration scored 39.4% on the annoyance index, well below her solo track “The Dead Dance.”

Jimin’s inclusion comes as BTS maintains its hiatus, which began in 2022 to allow members to complete mandatory military service in South Korea. The group plans to reunite in 2026 with new music and concerts.

10 Most Irritating TikTok Hits Of 2025

RankSong ArtistLikelihood people would find the song annoying (%
1Dame Un GrrrFantomel and Kate Linn45.7%
2She TwerkinCa$h Out44.1%
=3ACE UPBubaJuice44%
=3IllegalPinkPantheress44%
5UndressedSombr43.3%
6Symphony (feat. Zara Larsson)Clean Bandit and Zara Larsson43.1%
=7Hold My HandJess Glynne42.1%
=7Beez In The TrapNicki Minaj and Chainz42.1%
9ManchildSabrina Carpenter42.1%
10FoldedKehlani42%

Researchers acknowledges several limitations. Genre conventions and recording quality affect the metrics, making direct comparisons across musical styles imperfect. Short audio clips can exaggerate repetition scores. Annoyance remains subjective and varies by individual listener preference.

The study also notes bias in the source material. The analysis used seed lists featuring popular artists, leading to overrepresentation of certain performers like Taylor Swift and Sabrina Carpenter in the results.

Tracks scoring above 45% share common traits: melodic loops that repeat with minimal variation, sustained high-frequency content, harmonic progressions that remain largely static, and lyrics heavy on filler words rather than substantive content.

What SeatPick identifies as “annoying” through acoustic analysis might represent exactly the catchy, repetitive hooks that make a song memorable or danceable. The viral success of tracks like “Dame Un Grrr” shows that high annoyance scores don’t necessarily predict commercial failure. Whether listeners embrace or avoid these irritating tracks depends on personal taste, listening context, and tolerance for repetition.


Study Methodology

SeatPick analyzed popular songs released in 2025 to determine annoyance potential based on acoustic and lyrical properties. The study sourced songs from Apple Music charts, official top charts, and additional desk research to compile a representative sample of the year’s popular releases.

Each track underwent processing through an annoyingness index pipeline measuring four components: repetition, brightness, harmonic dullness, and lyrical filler density. Audio files were normalized and segmented, then analyzed using high-overlap time windows to detect repeated melodic or lyrical fragments associated with listener fatigue.

Parallel spectral analysis measured high-frequency dominance and harmonic imbalance, acoustic traits linked to harsh or piercing sound profiles. When lyrics were available, automated transcription was applied and a filler-word detector scored the proportion of non-semantic syllables like “yeah,” “uh,” “la,” and “ooh” relative to total lyrical content.

Each component produced a score from 0 to 1, which were combined using a weighted formula: Repetition 30%, Brightness 20%, Harmonic Dullness 20%, Filler Density 20%, with a 10% baseline bias. Final scores were scaled to a 0-10 range and converted to percentages representing the likelihood that typical listeners would find the track annoying.

Workflow-specific settings controlled segment overlap, sample rates, model selection, lexicon size, and repetition thresholds. Outputs were compiled into spreadsheets with breakdown panels showing each factor’s contribution to the overall score.

The methodology includes several caveats. Genre norms and recording styles affect metrics differently, making cross-genre comparisons imperfect. Short clips can exaggerate repetition scores compared to full-length songs. Annoyance remains subjective and varies by individual listener. The dataset shows bias toward certain artists like Taylor Swift and Sabrina Carpenter due to their prominence in the seed lists used to compile the initial song selection.

Data was collected on November 27, 2025. The analysis examined 149 popular songs from mainstream charts and 48 trending TikTok tracks, with scores ranging from approximately 35% to the high of 46% shared by Carpenter’s “Sugar Talking” and “Tears.”

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply