autistic girl

Credit: New Africa on Shutterstock

35-Year Study Shows How Condition Has Been Systematically Missed In Females

In A Nutshell

  • Autism diagnosis rates increased tenfold between 2000 and 2022, with teenage girls now receiving diagnoses at the highest rates of any group studied
  • Girls typically receive autism diagnoses five years later than boys, peaking at ages 15-19 rather than 10-14: often after years of being misdiagnosed with anxiety or depression
  • The male-to-female ratio for autism in Sweden has dropped from 3-4:1 in childhood to approaching 1:1 by early adulthood, challenging long-held assumptions about autism being predominantly male
  • Many girls with autism “camouflage” their traits by mimicking peers during childhood, but this masking becomes unsustainable during adolescence when social demands intensify

For decades, autism has been considered a condition that mostly affects boys. Now, research tracking nearly 3 million people in Sweden over 35 years reveals that supposed gender gap in early childhood might be partly an illusion created by when, not whether, girls get diagnosed.

Boys typically get their autism diagnosis around age 10 to 14. Girls? They peak five years later, between ages 15 and 19. And by the time people reach their twenties in Sweden, the numbers are approaching parity. Based on current trends, the researchers project the male-to-female ratio reached roughly equal levels by 2024. The long-standing assumption that autism is three to four times more common in males appears to reflect diagnostic timing more than actual prevalence.

Published in The BMJ, the study tracked 78,522 autism diagnoses from 1987 through 2022. What researchers found wasn’t just a shift in numbers, it was evidence that autism in females is systematically under-recognized during childhood.

The Chameleon Effect

It appears girls with autism may be better at hiding it. Researchers call this “camouflaging” or “masking,” or taking social cues from peers and mimicking their behavior to fit in. A girl who doesn’t naturally understand social rules might carefully study how other girls talk, gesture, and interact, then copy those patterns to avoid standing out.

This works reasonably well in elementary school, when social interactions are fairly straightforward. But adolescence changes everything. Friend groups become more complex. Subtle social hierarchies emerge. The unwritten rules multiply. And the exhausting effort of constantly pretending becomes harder to sustain.

That’s when the cracks start showing, but often not as “classic” autism traits. Instead, teenage girls show up in doctors’ offices with anxiety, depression, eating disorders, or burnout. And because they already have a psychiatric diagnosis, doctors may never think to look for autism underneath.

When Depression Masks Autism

This diagnostic overshadowing is one of the biggest barriers to identifying autism in females. Other research suggests nearly 70% of people with autism have at least one additional psychiatric condition. Studies in Sweden found that women are significantly more likely than men to receive other psychiatric diagnoses (anxiety, depression, OCD) before anyone considers autism.

A teenage girl struggling with an eating disorder is seen as having an eating disorder. One with severe anxiety is treated for anxiety. The underlying autism, which might actually explain why social situations feel so overwhelming or why certain routines feel essential, goes unrecognized for years.

The consequences aren’t trivial. Without understanding that autism is part of the picture, these girls miss out on appropriate support. They may internalize their struggles as personal failures rather than recognizing they’re navigating a world that doesn’t match their neurology. Women diagnosed with autism in adulthood commonly describe spending years feeling fundamentally different or “broken” before receiving an explanation that finally made sense of their experiences.

Autistic children tend to follow narrower dietary patterns.
Early signs of autism differ among young boys and girls. (Credit: ZikG on Shutterstock)

Why Screening Catches Boys But Misses Girls

Sweden has one of the most comprehensive childhood healthcare systems in the world. Every child gets screened for developmental differences at 18 months, 2.5 years, 4 years, and 5 years old. Yet girls with autism routinely slip through.

Part of the problem is that autism research has historically focused on boys and men. The diagnostic criteria and screening tools were developed based on how autism typically presents in males. Girls with autism often have different patterns of behavior. Females are less likely to line up toy cars or memorize train schedules, yet more likely to have intense interests in animals or reading that seem “normal” for girls.

Even the social difficulties look different. A boy with autism might avoid social interaction entirely. A girl with autism might desperately want friends but struggle to maintain friendships, leading to social isolation that looks more like shyness or social anxiety than a developmental difference.

The Numbers Tell The Story

While girls are catching up in diagnoses, autism rates overall have skyrocketed. For 10-to-14-year-olds, diagnosis rates increased roughly tenfold between 2000 and 2022. But the increase was even more dramatic for teenage girls, whose diagnosis rates in the 15-19 age group reached the highest of any group studied.

This surge doesn’t necessarily mean autism itself has become more common. Several factors are at play. Diagnostic criteria expanded substantially. In 1987, only severe autism was formally recognized, while today the definition encompasses a much broader spectrum. Starting in 2001, Sweden began including outpatient diagnoses in national registries, capturing cases that previously went unrecorded.

Greater awareness matters too. Parents, teachers, and individuals themselves are more likely to recognize potential signs and seek evaluation than they were a generation ago. And critically, there’s less stigma around the diagnosis, making people more willing to pursue assessment.

What This Means Going Forward

The Swedish data indicates autism doesn’t discriminate by sex nearly as much as our diagnostic systems do. The question isn’t whether girls have autism at similar rates to boys: the data increasingly suggests they do. The question is why a 10-year-old boy with autism gets identified and supported while a 10-year-old girl with the same condition gets missed, only to be diagnosed five years later after years of struggle.

That’s the real cost of late diagnosis. Not just delayed support, but years of self-blame and confusion that could have been avoided. As autism diagnoses continue to rise, understanding why girls are systematically identified later than boys isn’t just an academic question. It’s about ensuring that girls don’t spend their formative years without answers, struggling alone with challenges that have a name, even if nobody has thought to look for it yet.


Disclaimer: The experiences described may not reflect every individual’s journey with autism. If you have concerns about autism or developmental differences in yourself or your child, consult with a qualified healthcare provider or developmental specialist.


Paper Notes

Limitations

This study tracked autism diagnoses in Swedish national health registries rather than conducting direct clinical assessments, meaning it captured only clinically diagnosed cases. The registers provided limited information about specific autism traits, intellectual disability, or other conditions that often co-occur with autism, such as ADHD. The study excluded individuals whose parents were born outside Sweden (about 26% of births), potentially missing immigrant populations who may face different barriers to diagnosis. Before 2001, the national patient register only included inpatient diagnoses, artificially inflating age at diagnosis in earlier birth cohorts. The statistical modeling used to project trends to 2024 relied partially on incomplete data for those years, reflected in wider confidence intervals. The study could not control for within-family confounders like parental mental health, which may influence autism likelihood.

Funding and Disclosures

This research was supported by the Simons Foundation (grant 7340697), the Karolinska Institutet’s Research Foundation (grants 2018-01499, 2020-02156, and 2022-02021), and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 program (grant 733280, RECAP Research on Children and Adults Born Preterm). The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or the decision to publish.

Publication Details

Authors: Caroline Fyfe, Henric Winell, Joseph Dougherty, David H. Gutmann, Alexander Kolevzon, Natasha Marrus, Kristina Tedroff, Tychele N. Turner, Lauren A. Weiss, Benjamin H.K. Yip, Weiyao Yin, Sven Sandin | Affiliations: Karolinska Institutet (Sweden); Washington University School of Medicine (USA); Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (USA); Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment (USA); University of California San Francisco (USA); Chinese University of Hong Kong | Journal: The BMJ (British Medical Journal), February 4, 2026 Article Title: “Time trends in the male to female ratio for autism incidence: population based, prospectively collected, birth cohort study” | DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2025-084164 | Study Design: Population-based birth cohort study using Sweden’s national health registries | Study Population: 2,756,779 individuals born in Sweden between 1985 and 2020, followed through December 31, 2022 | Ethics Approval: National Swedish Ethics Review Board (approval numbers: 2017/1875-31/1; 2018/1864-32; 2019-06314; 2023-00948-02)

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply