
(© Татьяна Макарова - stock.adobe.com)
Research shows that brains across all species tune themselves to a precise ‘sweet spot’ for optimal function
In A Nutshell
- Brains across species naturally tune themselves to a “critical point” between order and chaos.
- This balance lets neurons communicate efficiently, store and recall memories, and adapt quickly.
- Shifts away from criticality link to epilepsy (too much order) and conditions like Alzheimer’s or schizophrenia (too much randomness).
- Sleep appears to help the brain return to its optimal critical state for learning and mental health.
ST. LOUIS — Consider a tightrope walker perfectly balanced on a wire, not falling to either side but poised at the exact point where they have maximum control and flexibility. A growing body of work supports the hypothesis that the human brain operates in a remarkably similar way, maintaining itself at a precise “sweet spot” that maximizes its computational power and ability to learn.
A meta-analysis published in the journal Neuron reveals that healthy brains across all species naturally tune themselves to what researchers call a “critical point.” The state optimizes everything from memory formation to complex decision-making. When brains drift away from the critical state, the consequences can be severe, potentially leading to conditions like epilepsy, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease.
How the Brain’s Critical State Works
The concept of criticality comes from physics, where it describes systems poised at the edge of dramatic change, like water at the exact temperature where it transforms from liquid to ice. In the brain, the critical state creates organized activity patterns that remain consistent whether scientists observe individual neurons firing over milliseconds or large brain regions communicating over minutes.
Brain activity at criticality maintains coordinated patterns across all timescales. The arrangement provides several crucial advantages: information flows efficiently across different brain regions, complex memories form and persist, and the brain maintains “marginal stability.” The brain becomes stable enough to function reliably, yet flexible enough to adapt quickly to new situations.
Rather than being locked into rigid patterns or dissolving into chaos, the critical brain strikes the perfect balance between order and flexibility.
Brain Criticality Found Across All Species
Research team leaders Keith Hengen from Washington University and Woodrow Shew from the University of Arkansas analyzed 320 studies spanning two decades. Their analysis represents the largest review of brain criticality research to date. The investigation revealed signatures of criticality across an impressive range of species and experimental conditions.
Evidence for the critical brain state appears in humans, monkeys, rats, mice, cats, zebrafish, turtles, leeches, and even crayfish. The consistency across such diverse species strongly indicates that criticality represents a clear principle of how nervous systems evolve to optimize computation.
Even more striking, researchers detected these critical dynamics using virtually every tool available for measuring brain activity. Whether scientists monitored individual neurons firing, recorded electrical activity from the scalp, or employed brain imaging that tracks blood flow, they consistently found evidence of the same underlying critical dynamics.

Scientists Resolve 20-Year Brain Research Controversy
For years, the field was divided by conflicting results. Early studies examining individual neuron activity in awake animals often failed to find evidence of criticality, while studies using other measurement techniques consistently supported it.
The current analysis reveals the controversy stemmed from a methodological issue rather than a fundamental problem with the theory. Early studies that looked at individual neurons used time windows that were too short to capture the brain’s critical dynamics.
Hengen and Shew performed a detailed analysis of 140 datasets from 73 different studies. Studies using longer time windows for their analysis, allowing them to capture slower brain dynamics, consistently found strong evidence for criticality. Studies using shorter time windows missed these patterns entirely.
How Brain Disorders Disrupt the Critical Balance
One of the most compelling aspects of the research is how deviations from criticality correlate with various brain disorders. The analysis found consistent patterns across multiple conditions.
During epileptic seizures, brain networks shift toward excessive coordination and stereotyped large-scale events. Essentially, the brain becomes too synchronized. Conversely, conditions like schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, autism spectrum disorders, and depression all show signs of reduced coordination and disrupted communication patterns.
The criticality framework reveals that many seemingly different neurological and psychiatric conditions might share a common underlying problem: an inability to maintain the optimal critical state that maximizes brain function.
The authors predict that successful therapeutic interventions should correlate with restoration of critical dynamics. The approach could provide a new way to evaluate treatments and potentially develop therapies specifically designed to restore the brain’s critical balance.
Multiple studies indicate that sleep helps move the brain closer to its critical point, potentially explaining why sleep is so essential for cognitive function and mental health.
The researchers argue that criticality represents more than just an interesting property of brain networks. It may be the fundamental organizing principle that allows brains to achieve their remarkable capabilities. At criticality, networks maximize their ability to store information, transmit signals efficiently, and adapt quickly to new situations.
“Evolution should prefer an open-ended ready state that maximizes the likelihood of success as broadly as possible,” the authors wrote. Criticality provides exactly such an optimal starting point for learning and adaptation.
After decades of studying the brain’s complexity, scientists may have identified one of its most fundamental operating principles. The brain’s ability to maintain itself at the critical sweet spot, balanced perfectly between chaos and rigidity, could be the key to understanding how three pounds of tissue can generate consciousness, creativity, and the full richness of human experience.
Paper Summary
Methodology
The researchers conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of criticality research in neuroscience spanning 2003-2024. They systematically searched scientific databases using terms related to brain activity, avalanches, and consistent patterns across time. Their analysis included 320 total papers, with a detailed examination of 140 datasets from 73 studies. They used specialized software to extract quantitative data from published figures and analyzed the relationship between methodological choices, particularly time window duration, and evidence for criticality.
Results
The analysis revealed strong evidence for criticality across diverse species including humans, monkeys, rodents, cats, zebrafish, turtles, leeches, and crayfish, along with multiple measurement techniques from individual neurons to whole-brain imaging. The examination resolved a long-standing controversy by showing that studies using longer time windows (greater than 10 milliseconds) consistently found evidence for criticality, while those using shorter windows did not. Brain disorders consistently showed deviations from criticality: epilepsy toward excessive coordination, and schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s, autism, and depression toward reduced coordination. Evidence indicates sleep and natural brain maintenance mechanisms help restore critical dynamics.
Limitations
The analysis relied on extracting data from published figures rather than raw datasets, which could introduce some measurement error. The authors acknowledge the approach “is not the best practice for fitting power laws” but found it empirically effective. Some inclusion and exclusion criteria had to be applied subjectively. The review focuses primarily on one type of evidence (avalanche analysis) among several methods for detecting criticality.
Funding and Disclosures
The research was supported by National Institutes of Health BRAIN Initiative awards R01NS118442 (K.B.H.) and R01DA060744 (W.L.S.), NIH AREA award R15NS135396 (W.L.S.), the Arkansas Biosciences Institute (W.L.S.), and the Incubator for Transdisciplinary Futures at Washington University in St. Louis (K.B.H.). The authors declared no competing interests.
Publication Information
Hengen, K.B., & Shew, W.L. (2025). “Is criticality a unified setpoint of brain function?” was published in Neuron on June 23, 2025. Published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2025.05.020








So sometimes the brain works better than other times, and the times it works better is called “criticality”?
Order. Chaos. It’s like brain entropy. Depeche Mode said it so long ago: “Get the balance right.”