bladder cancer

Credit: SaiArLawKa2 on Shutterstock

BKPyV infection is often asymptomatic or mild during childhood, but may leave a lasting impact on cancer risk.

In A Nutshell

  • Nearly all adults (95%) carry BK polyomavirus from childhood infections that persist dormant in kidney tissue throughout life
  • When the virus reactivates, immune enzymes meant to fight it accidentally damage DNA in nearby healthy bladder cells
  • These “bystander” cells accumulate cancer-causing mutations while infected cells get eliminated, explaining why tumors contain viral damage patterns but no actual virus
  • Scientists say vaccines or antivirals targeting this common virus could potentially prevent a significant portion of bladder cancers

A virus that 95% of adults carry from childhood infections may be initiating bladder cancer decades later, according to research from the University of York and collaborating institutions.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infects nearly everyone during childhood and stays dormant in kidney tissue throughout life. Scientists have now uncovered how this common infection can trigger cancer-linked DNA damage in healthy bladder cells, even though the virus itself disappears from the tumor.

The research, published in Science Advances, solves a medical mystery: bladder tumors show clear signs of viral damage yet rarely contain any actual virus.

How Your Immune System’s Defense Becomes a Cancer Risk

When the dormant virus reactivates and sheds into urine, bladder cells detect the threat and launch a defense by releasing interferons. These signals activate enzymes called APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B, which scramble DNA to stop viruses from replicating. But the enzymes lack precision. Healthy cells next to the infection site get caught in the crossfire and suffer DNA damage too.

Researchers call this “transmutagenesis” because mutations happen in bystander cells rather than in the infected cells themselves.

Using human bladder tissue cultures and organ models, researchers watched infected cells get isolated and pushed out through the bladder’s surface, a defense mechanism called apical extrusion. Around this zone, neighboring cells cranked up production of APOBEC3 enzymes and started accumulating DNA mutations identical to those found in bladder cancer patients.

The team used a very sensitive DNA reading method that can detect real, permanent mutations rather than just temporary DNA lesions.

Cells with higher APOBEC3 activity picked up noticeably more of these mutations than cells with lower activity. When researchers disabled the APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B genes, those modified cells stopped accumulating mutation patterns during infection, confirming the enzymes cause the DNA damage.

The research team also tested whether blocking the interferon signaling pathway could prevent APOBEC3 activation. They used drugs called JAK inhibitors that stop interferon signals from reaching their targets. When cells were pretreated with these inhibitors before viral infection, APOBEC3A levels stayed low, preventing the enzyme buildup that drives mutation accumulation.

Dr. Simon Baker from the University of York.
Dr. Simon Baker from the University of York. (Credit: Kidney Research UK)

Why Bladder Tumors Test Negative for the Virus

A large share of mutations in many bladder cancers carry these distinct patterns, though the proportion varies widely between patients. Yet most tumors contain no detectable virus.

The explanation: infected cells trigger damage in neighbors, then get eliminated by the bladder’s defenses. The damaged bystander cells survive and accumulate more mutations each time the virus reactivates over the years. Eventually they develop into tumors with no trace of what started the process.

A biopsy from a patient with BK virus bladder inflammation showed exactly this pattern, with APOBEC3-positive cells surrounding but not touching cells that contained viral proteins.

Researchers also analyzed 348 muscle-invasive bladder cancer samples from a large patient database. On average, 36% of mutations in these tumors were APOBEC3-type, though the range varied widely from 8% to 74% between patients. Neither the total number of these mutations nor their specific character differed between bladder cancer subtypes, suggesting this mechanism operates across different forms of the disease.

The team found substantial differences between people in how their cells respond to infection. Some people’s cells mainly produced APOBEC3A, others made more APOBEC3B, and many had mixed responses. These individual differences appeared in mutation patterns and reflect the variety seen in actual bladder cancer tumors, suggesting genetics or environment could affect someone’s cancer risk from this virus.

Could Bladder Cancer Become Preventable?

BKPyV already causes problems in people with weakened immune systems, including kidney damage in transplant recipients and bladder inflammation in bone marrow transplant patients. These groups have higher bladder cancer rates too.

But the new research shows the virus’s role extends beyond immunocompromised populations. BKPyV appears in urine samples from healthy people, and detection rates climb with age.

“A large proportion of urothelial carcinomas may be preventable by antiviral intervention,” the authors write. No vaccines or antiviral drugs exist yet for BKPyV, but scientists think such treatments might eventually reduce bladder cancer risk, though this idea remains untested. Transplant patients would especially benefit since they face both immediate viral complications and long-term cancer risk.

Screening could help too. Because BKPyV appears in urine years or decades before cancer develops, testing for viral reactivation might identify high-risk individuals who need closer monitoring or preventive treatment.

Unlike viruses that stick around in tumor cells, BKPyV operates through hit-and-run tactics, creating lasting damage before vanishing. That makes the cancer connection trickier to spot but potentially simpler to prevent by blocking the virus before it damages cells.


Paper Summary

Limitations

The research used in vitro models of human urothelial tissue including differentiated cell cultures and organ cultures. While these systems recapitulate key features of BKPyV infection seen in patients, they cannot fully replicate the complexity of viral reactivation patterns and immune responses in living humans over decades. The study focused on a single point of infection rather than modeling repeated episodic reactivations that likely occur during natural infection. Additionally, because BKPyV only infects human cells, traditional animal models cannot be used to study this mechanism, limiting experimental approaches. The nanorate sequencing method detects true mutations but cannot determine how long uracil lesions persist in non-dividing cells before being converted to permanent mutations during tissue repair.

Funding and Disclosures

Research at the University of York was funded by a Kidney Research UK fellowship (INT_006_20210728) and York Against Cancer core funding. Work at the University of Texas at San Antonio was supported by NCI P01 CA234228 and CPRIT RR220053. Research at the NCI was supported by the Intramural Research Program (1ZIABC011894). University of Leeds research was funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/X030997/1) and Kidney Research UK (RP_018_20220706). One coauthor (I.M.) is a cofounder, shareholder, consultant, and Scientific Advisory Board member for Quotient Therapeutics Limited. One coauthor (R.S.H.) is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator.

Publication Information

Hatton GH, James SR, Mason AS, Gawne RT, Vogel H, Hogg K, Boukani P, Swinscoe G, Khan A, Welberry Smith M, Carpenter MA, Masood O, Martincorena I, Macdonald A, Harris RS, Starrett GJ, Southgate J, Baker SC. Virus-induced APOBEC3 transmutagenesis in bladder cancer initiation. Science Advances 11, eaea6124 (2025). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aea6124. Published December 3, 2025. Authors are affiliated with the University of York (Jack Birch Unit for Molecular Carcinogenesis and Bioscience Technology Facility), National Cancer Institute (Laboratory of Cellular Oncology), University of Leeds (Faculty of Biological Sciences), St. James’s University Hospital Leeds (Department of Haematology and Leeds Kidney Unit), University of Texas at San Antonio (Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute), and Wellcome Sanger Institute (Cancer, Ageing and Somatic Mutation).

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

  1. Jm says:

    If ~ 95% of people have had this virus as children and are (were?) often asymptomatic, how would you know if you actually had it? The paper mentions screening for the virus, but doesn’t actually say if there are methods available for such screening (if there were, it would be nice if they were mentioned). So, everything discussed in this paper sounds mostly theoretical to me. It’s interesting, but might get people worried, thinking they’re doomed to bladder cancer at some point in their life.