JFK assassination

President John F. Kennedy and newly released documents related to his assassination. (Credit: SWNS)

‘You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to think it’s suspicious.’

WASHINGTON — Newly declassified U.S. government files from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are leading some to form a bizarre link between the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and flying saucers. The extraordinary connection comes after President Joe Biden recently cleared formerly top-secret documents to “provide a fuller understanding” of JFK’s murder.

The assassination has been pored over for decades, but one document has revealed the previously redacted name of a CIA official, Reuben Efron, who intercepted Lee Harvey Oswald’s mail in the months before the tragic shooting on Nov. 22, 1963.

However, Efron is named in another file, dated Oct. 15, 1955, which details a bizarre sighting of “flying saucers” while on a train trip through the Soviet Union. The official CIA document says the “reported sighting of unusual aircraft in USSR” was made by “three reliable US observers.”

Page one of October 15, 1955 document detailing CIA official, Reuben Efron's flying saucer encounter. A newly-unredacted other file would name him in relation to Lee Harvey Oswald surveillance prior to JFK assassination.
Page one of October 15, 1955 document detailing CIA official, Reuben Efron’s flying saucer encounter. A newly-unredacted other file would name him in relation to Lee Harvey Oswald surveillance prior to JFK assassination. (Credit: SWNS)

The excerpt from a cable received from the U.S. Air Force reveals these individuals as Efron, Senator Richard Russell, and a Lt. Col. E. U. Hathaway. Senator Russell would later sit on the Warren Commission, which was tasked with investigating the JFK assassination.

The description of the incident in the “Trancaucasus Region” details “two mound and circular unconventional aircraft resembling flying discs or flying saucers were seen taking off almost vertically one minute apart.”

It goes on to describe the craft as revolving and shooting “sparks or flame,” before passing over the “observer’s train.” The flying discs are said to have ascended before their speed increased “sharply.”

“After sighting, Soviet train men became excited and lowered curtains and refused permission to look out windows,” the report adds. “US observers firmly believe these unconventional aircraft are flying saucer or disc aircraft.”

Page two of October 15, 1955 document detailing CIA official, Reuben Efron's flying saucer encounter. A newly-unredacted other file would name him in relation to Lee Harvey Oswald surveillance prior to JFK assassination.
Page two of October 15, 1955 document detailing CIA official, Reuben Efron’s flying saucer encounter. A newly-unredacted other file would name him in relation to Lee Harvey Oswald surveillance prior to JFK assassination. (Credit: SWNS)

The memo detailing the intercept of JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald’s mail has been released before, but Reuben Efron’s name was previously redacted.

“People say there’s nothing significant in these files?” Jefferson Morley, editor of the JFK Facts blog, told The New York Times. “Bingo! Here’s the guy who was reading Oswald’s mail, a detail they failed to share until now. You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to think it’s suspicious.”

According to The New York Times, Efron reportedly died three decades ago.

“In the three decades since the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 U.S.C. 2107 note) (the “Act”) was enacted, the United States Government has undertaken a comprehensive review of its records and has strived to make available to the public thousands of classified documents that provide a fuller understanding of the tragic assassination of President John F. Kennedy,” the White House says, according to a June 30 memorandum issued by President Biden.

You might also be interested in:

South West News Service writer Dean Murray contributed to this report.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

2 Comments

  1. Noel Bardoon says:

    Just because an officer was assigned to two widely divergent cases doesn’t prove a link between the two cases .