Tsunami wave (seiche)

Generated image depicting a powerful ocean wave from a seiche or tsunami. (© avila - stock.adobe.com)

In a nutshell

  • The Mystery Solved: A 9-day global seismic signal was caused by a massive “standing wave” trapped in a Greenland fjord after a climate-triggered landslide.
  • First Direct Evidence: NASA’s SWOT satellite captured the first visual proof of this phenomenon, showing water sloshing back and forth with enough force to shake the entire planet.
  • Climate Warning: As Arctic glaciers continue melting due to climate change, scientists expect more of these unprecedented extreme events in remote regions.

OXFORD, England — In September 2023, something unprecedented happened: a mysterious seismic signal echoed around the globe for nine straight days. Seismometers from Greenland to Antarctica detected a repeating vibration every 92 seconds, puzzling scientists worldwide. Even more baffling, an “identical signal” with half the magnitude and duration occurred. Now, for the first time, researchers have captured direct visual evidence of what caused this global phenomenon using cutting-edge satellite technology.

A study by British researchers presents the first direct satellite observations of a massive seiche — essentially a standing wave sloshing back and forth in a remote Greenland fjord with such force that it caused detectable vibrations in the Earth’s crust. The research, published in Nature Communications, confirms what scientists had theorized but never directly observed: that a tsunami triggered by a catastrophic landslide became trapped in Dickson Fjord and continued oscillating for over a week.

The Mystery That Captivated Scientists Worldwide

When the seismic signal first appeared on September 16, 2023, scientists were baffled. Unlike typical earthquakes that last minutes, this signal persisted with metronomic regularity for over a week. Some researchers initially thought their instruments were broken when they detected the strange vibrations.

Stephen Hicks, a seismologist at University College London who co-authored earlier research on the event, told CNN the event didn’t roll and rumble like most earthquakes do. Rather, this activity was like a “monotonous hum” stirring the underground.

Previous studies had theorized that the signal originated from a seiche in Dickson Fjord following a massive landslide-triggered tsunami. The landslide itself was extraordinary: 25 million cubic meters of rock and ice crashed into the fjord after glacial thinning destabilized a mountain slope. But direct observational evidence of the seiche remained elusive until now.

A Satellite Revolution Captures the Invisible

Enter the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission, a joint NASA-CNES satellite launched in December 2022. Traditional satellites provide only narrow snapshots of ocean surfaces. SWOT captures ultra-high resolution measurements across a 50-kilometer swath. Its Ka-band Radar Interferometer (KaRIn) enables it to see into narrow coastal environments, including fjords.

Lead researcher Thomas Monahan from Oxford University and his team analyzed SWOT’s observations of Dickson Fjord following the September landslide. One pass occurred about 12 hours after the event.

“SWOT is a game changer for studying oceanic processes in regions such as fjords which previous satellites struggled to see into,” Monahan said in a statement.

Catching a Seiche in Action

The satellite data revealed extraordinary evidence: clear cross-channel slopes in the fjord’s water surface. It was exactly what you’d expect from a massive standing wave. Using KaRIn data, the team created elevation maps of the fjord that showed height differences of up to two meters, indicating water was sloshing from one side to the other.

To connect this visual evidence to seismic data, researchers compared it with filtered signals from a seismic station in Alert, Canada, about 1,300 km (808 miles) away. The alignment was striking: the timing and direction of water movement matched the seismic displacements exactly as predicted by seiche theory.

This correlation allowed the team to reconstruct the wave’s behavior even during periods not captured by the satellite.

Copernicus Sentinel-2 satellite image of the Dickson Fjord in East Greenland with the observed sea-surface height measurements from the SWOT satellite of the Earth-shaking wave on October 11th overlaid.
Copernicus Sentinel-2 satellite image of the Dickson Fjord in East Greenland with the observed sea-surface height measurements from the SWOT satellite of the Earth-shaking wave on October 11th overlaid. (Credit: Thomas Monahan)

Ruling Out Other Explanations

Before concluding they had captured a seiche, the team ruled out other potential causes. Local wind data and tidal modeling didn’t match the observed cross-channel slopes.

“The KaRIn radar’s resolution was fine enough to make observations between the relatively narrow walls of the fjord,” said Lee-Lueng Fu, SWOT project scientist, in a NASA interview. “The footprint of the conventional altimeters used to measure ocean height is too large to resolve such a small body of water.”

A Wave That Shook the World

The research confirms that the trapped wave in the fjord initially reached astonishing heights. Earlier modeling and remote sensing suggest tsunami runups as high as 200 meters near the point of impact before the energy settled into a rhythmic seiche that lasted nine days.

“SWOT happened to fly over at a time when the water had piled up pretty high against the north wall of the fjord,” said Josh Willis, a sea level researcher at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “Seeing the shape of the wave — that’s something we could never do before SWOT.”

Even a Danish military vessel that visited the fjord three days after the event did not see the wave, demonstrating how elusive it was despite its global seismic impact.

A Climate Change Warning

Beyond solving a scientific mystery, the research reveals how climate change can trigger unexpected and extreme events in remote places. The landslide that sparked the tsunami was caused by glacial thinning—a process accelerating across the Arctic.

“Climate change is giving rise to new, unseen extremes,” said Monahan, who works in Oxford’s Department of Engineering Science.

The fact that a localized event in a remote Greenland fjord could generate seismic signals detectable across the globe highlights the planet’s interconnectedness. As Arctic temperatures rise faster than anywhere else on Earth, scientists expect to see more of these rare but powerful events.

“This study is an example of how the next generation of satellite data can resolve phenomena that has remained a mystery in the past,” added co-author Professor Thomas Adcock of Oxford. “We will be able to get new insights into ocean extremes such as tsunamis, storm surges, and freak waves.”

A New Era of Earth Observation

The study marks a turning point for ocean science, showing that modern satellite altimetry, which once tracked only slow, broad ocean trends, can now capture fast, localized, extreme events in places like fjords.

As climate change continues to reshape Earth’s most remote regions, tools like SWOT will be essential for detecting and understanding the extreme events to come. The seiche that shook the world may have been unprecedented, but it likely won’t be the last.


Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers used data from the Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission to observe the Dickson fjord in Greenland following two landslide events in September and October 2023. SWOT’s KaRIn instrument provided high-resolution two-dimensional measurements of ocean surfaces with 2.5-meter resolution and sub-centimeter accuracy. The team analyzed pixelcloud observations captured at multiple time points after each event (0.5, 1.5, and 4.8 days for September; 0.5 days for October) and correlated these with seismic data from the II.ALE station in Greenland. They used Bayesian machine learning techniques to estimate cross-channel slopes and applied spatially coherent Bayesian harmonic analysis to rule out tidal effects.

Results

The satellite observations revealed clear evidence of cross-channel slopes in the fjord consistent with a massive seiche (standing wave). The researchers estimated the initial amplitude of the September seiche at 7.9 meters, with the October event reaching roughly half that magnitude. Cross-channel slope patterns correlated perfectly with seismic displacement measurements, confirming the seiche theory. The team successfully ruled out alternative explanations including tidal effects and wind-driven circulation through detailed analysis of meteorological and tidal data.

Limitations

The study was constrained by SWOT’s temporal sparsity, with limited observation windows following each event. Some data suffered from noise artifacts that reduced accuracy, particularly for the September 18th observations. The research was also limited by the 23 usable satellite passes available for tidal analysis due to winter sea ice and data processing errors. Seismic attribution uncertainties existed due to complexities in computing exact phase velocities and source locations.

Funding and Disclosures

The authors T.M. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Eric and Wendy Schmidt AI in Science Postdoctoral Fellowship, a Schmidt Futures program. The authors declared no competing interests. All data and code for replication are available through Zenodo repository.

Publication Information

This study was published in Nature Communications in 2025 (volume 16, article 4777). The paper was received on November 28, 2024, accepted on May 7, 2025, and published online on June 3, 2025. The research was conducted by Thomas Monahan, Tianning Tang, Stephen Roberts, and Thomas A.A. Adcock from the University of Oxford and University of Manchester. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59851-7

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply