cockroach on food

Cockroaches are spreading toxins all over households. (Credit: New Africa on Shutterstock)

In A Nutshell

  • German cockroaches leave both allergens and measurable bacterial toxins (endotoxins) in household dust.
  • In infested homes, kitchen dust had about twice the endotoxin and far higher cockroach allergens than uninfested homes.
  • A whole-home gel bait treatment cut roaches by ~96% in three months and drove allergens and endotoxin down toward control levels.
  • Allergens were clearly airborne in HVAC filters; endotoxin in filters was low and variable. The study did not track child health outcomes.

Scientists have long understood that cockroaches trigger allergic reactions and asthma in children, especially those in low-income urban housing. Now, research indicates these pests spread something more dangerous than allergens: bacterial toxins that may amplify the allergic responses cockroaches are already known to cause.

Researchers from North Carolina State University and the University of Toronto found that German cockroaches excrete large quantities of endotoxins (inflammatory compounds from gut bacteria) directly into homes. A single female cockroach deposits roughly 5,000 endotoxin units daily through her feces. In a typical infestation of thousands of insects, millions of toxic units contaminate floors and other surfaces. Cockroach allergens also show up in HVAC filters, indicating they become airborne indoors.

Published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Global, the study establishes cockroaches as a major source of indoor endotoxins and shows that when infestations are eliminated, endotoxin and allergen levels fall in parallel.

What Are Endotoxins and Why Do They Matter?

Endotoxins are fragments of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. When inhaled, they trigger inflammatory responses in airways, causing wheezing, throat irritation, and breathing difficulties. Past research has connected endotoxin exposure to increased asthma risk, but evidence linking cockroaches to household endotoxins had been suggestive. This study directly measured endotoxin in cockroach feces and linked home endotoxin levels to infestation size.

German cockroaches, the most common indoor pest in low-income communities, harbor diverse bacterial communities in their digestive systems. As these insects defecate, molt, and die throughout a home, they spread live microbes and the endotoxins those bacteria shed.

Earlier studies found statistical associations between cockroach allergens and endotoxins in house dust, especially in homes of asthmatic children. But researchers couldn’t confirm whether cockroaches actually produced the endotoxins or if both simply occurred together in similar environments. Bacterial communities in infested apartments overlap more with those found in cockroach guts than with uninfested homes, suggesting cockroaches shape the indoor microbiome.

More endotoxins are shed from the fecal matter of female cockroaches.
More endotoxins are shed from the fecal matter of female cockroaches. (Photo courtesy of Matt Bertone, NC State University.)

Each Cockroach Produces Thousands of Toxic Units Daily

To measure how much endotoxin cockroaches produce, researchers collected feces from adult male and female German cockroaches in controlled laboratory conditions. Female cockroaches produced more fecal material per day than males and excreted feces with higher endotoxin concentrations—2,900 units per milligram compared to 1,400 units per milligram in males.

Breaking down the numbers: each male cockroach releases approximately 750 endotoxin units daily, while each female deposits around 5,000 units. In a heavily infested apartment housing several thousand cockroaches, the insects collectively spread millions of endotoxin units throughout the living space.

Testing Contamination in Low-Income Apartments

Researchers recruited 37 apartments in low-income housing communities in Raleigh, North Carolina. They divided homes into three groups: uninfested control homes (8 apartments), infested homes receiving no intervention (14 apartments), and infested homes where cockroaches were eliminated using commercial gel baits (15 apartments).

At baseline, researchers set traps and collected dust samples from kitchen floors, bedroom floors, and heating and air conditioning filters. Infested homes trapped an average of 47 cockroaches per day, with kitchens showing the highest concentrations.

Dust analysis revealed stark differences. Kitchen dust in infested homes contained 17 times more Bla g 2 allergen (a major cockroach allergen) than uninfested kitchens. Bedroom dust in infested homes had nearly 21 times more allergen than uninfested bedrooms.

Endotoxin levels showed a similar pattern. Kitchen dust from infested homes averaged 177 endotoxin units per milligram, double the concentration in uninfested kitchens. These levels far exceeded the national average of 24 units per milligram reported in a large survey of American homes.

Heating and cooling filters provided especially revealing data for allergens. Because these filters collect airborne particles from throughout the home over time, they offered a picture of what residents were actually breathing. Filters from infested homes contained 6 to 11 times more cockroach allergen than those from uninfested homes, confirming allergens become airborne. Endotoxin results in filters were low and variable.

Eliminating Cockroaches Slashed Both Allergens and Toxins

After baseline measurements, researchers treated intervention homes by placing small amounts of insecticidal gel bait throughout entire apartments—not just kitchens, but wherever cockroaches aggregate. The team revisited homes at three months and six months.

Results were dramatic. Cockroach numbers in intervention homes plummeted by more than 96% within three months and remained near zero through six months. By study’s end, 12 of 15 intervention homes had completely eliminated their cockroach populations.

As cockroach numbers dropped, allergen levels followed. Kitchen dust in intervention homes saw Bla g 2 concentrations fall from 1,281 nanograms per gram at baseline to just 129 nanograms per gram at six months—a tenfold reduction. Bedroom allergen levels followed a similar pattern. Allergen concentrations in many intervention homes dropped below detectable limits.

Endotoxin levels declined in tandem. Kitchen dust endotoxin concentrations in intervention homes fell from 180 units per milligram to 69 units per milligram by six months, approaching levels in uninfested homes. Control homes that received no intervention maintained high endotoxin levels throughout.

Statistical analysis confirmed the connection: cockroach trap counts correlated strongly with both allergen and endotoxin concentrations in kitchen dust. In HVAC filters, allergen levels tracked closely with roach counts; endotoxin did not show a significant pattern.

How Bacterial Toxins May Amplify Allergic Responses

The discovery that cockroaches spread both allergens and endotoxins simultaneously raises important questions about how these substances interact in the body. Recent animal research suggests endotoxins may function as environmental adjuvants—substances that boost immune responses to other triggers.

In one study, mice exposed to weakly allergenic proteins together with endotoxin became sensitized to those allergens and developed allergic asthma upon subsequent exposure. Without the endotoxin, the allergenic proteins alone failed to trigger sensitization.

If endotoxins potentiate allergic responses in humans as they do in mice, children in cockroach-infested homes may face compounding threats. Not only are they exposed to high levels of cockroach allergens, but simultaneous exposure to cockroach-derived endotoxins may amplify their bodies’ responses. In people, this remains a hypothesis; the study didn’t test health outcomes.

This could help explain why cockroach sensitization is one of the strongest risk factors for asthma development in low-income urban populations. Studies have found that 60% to 80% of inner-city children with asthma test positive for cockroach allergen sensitivity, and cockroach allergens have been detected in 85% of inner-city homes.

Why This Matters for Health Equity

Cockroach infestations disproportionately affect low-income communities, contributing to well-documented health disparities in childhood asthma. Reasons for higher infestation rates involve factors like building age, maintenance issues, shared walls in multi-unit housing, and limited access to pest control services.

Children living in cockroach-infested homes face year-round exposure to perennial allergens and elevated endotoxin levels. This chronic exposure has been linked to asthma development and increased asthma morbidity, including more frequent symptoms, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.

Past research shows that relocating asthmatic children from high-poverty urban neighborhoods with heavy cockroach allergen exposure to low-poverty neighborhoods with lower allergen levels leads to measurable improvements in asthma symptoms. Environmental interventions targeting cockroaches in place have similarly shown health benefits.

A Single Intervention Proved Highly Effective

One encouraging finding is that a single, well-executed intervention focusing solely on cockroach elimination proved highly effective at reducing both allergens and endotoxins. Previous multi-faceted interventions targeting multiple allergen sources have shown health benefits, but they’re often complex and expensive to implement.

Researchers deployed commercial gel baits throughout intervention homes, placing small amounts in areas where cockroaches aggregate. Because cockroaches often distribute themselves throughout entire apartments, the team treated whole homes rather than single rooms. When cockroach populations showed signs of resistance at follow-up visits, researchers switched to different bait products.

This approach eliminated cockroaches from 80% of intervention homes by six months. The intervention required no extensive cleaning, renovation, or resident behavior changes. It simply removed the source.

Allergen and endotoxin reductions followed cockroach elimination, though not immediately. Cockroach allergens are highly persistent and can remain in household dust for extended periods, particularly in hard-to-clean areas behind large appliances and furniture. Even after cockroaches were eliminated, some homes showed detectable allergen levels at six months, likely due to existing reservoirs redistributing.

Nevertheless, allergen concentrations declined substantially in intervention homes while remaining high or increasing in control homes that retained their cockroach populations. This pattern shows that eliminating active cockroach populations is necessary to achieve meaningful reductions in allergen burden—marginal decreases in cockroach numbers aren’t sufficient.

Study Limitations and Next Steps

While this study establishes that cockroaches are major sources of indoor endotoxins, multiple sources contribute to household endotoxin levels. Pets, humans, and environmental bacteria from both outdoor and indoor environments all add to the endotoxin burden.

Carpeted floors, especially in bedrooms, can serve as reservoirs for both endotoxins and allergens, requiring extensive cleaning to remove accumulated contamination. Hard flooring in kitchens is easier to clean and less conducive to long-term retention of dust-associated contaminants.

The study focused on low-income multi-unit housing in a single city, and cockroach populations, housing characteristics, and environmental factors vary across regions. Additional research in other locations would help confirm these findings more broadly.

Researchers note that this proof-of-concept study was designed to identify sources of asthma triggers and show that interventions can reduce exposure. It did not directly measure whether reducing cockroach-derived allergens and endotoxins improves health outcomes in asthmatic children. That essential next step requires follow-up studies tracking asthma symptoms, medication use, and healthcare utilization in children living in treated versus untreated homes.

The Path Forward

Despite these limitations, the study provides strong evidence that cockroaches contribute considerably to both allergen and endotoxin exposure in low-income homes. Eliminating these pests should be a priority for improving indoor environmental health.

Researchers emphasize that effective cockroach elimination must be verified objectively using traps or other quantitative methods rather than visual inspection or resident reports. Due to widespread insecticide resistance in cockroach populations, control product effectiveness varies, and switching between different active ingredients may be necessary.

Cost-effective, sustainable cockroach eradication tactics are urgently needed, especially for resource-limited households facing the greatest infestation burdens. Environmental interventions that successfully eliminate cockroaches, combined with medical treatments for asthma, offer promise for reducing considerable health disparities affecting children in low-income communities.

For families dealing with cockroach infestations, this research offers both a sobering reality and a hopeful message. The hidden danger extends beyond visible insects to what they leave behind in dust, in air, and in the lungs of vulnerable children. But the same research shows that eliminating the source can sharply reduce exposure to both allergens and bacterial toxins, potentially interrupting the cycle that drives asthma development and severity in America’s most vulnerable young residents.


Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and is not medical or legal advice. Do not use it to diagnose or treat asthma. Talk with a licensed clinician about your child’s care. For pest control decisions, consult a qualified professional. The study summarized here did not measure health outcomes.


Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers conducted a controlled intervention study in 37 low-income apartments in Raleigh, North Carolina, between 2018 and 2019. Apartments were divided into three groups: uninfested control homes (8 apartments), infested control homes receiving no intervention (14 apartments), and infested intervention homes (15 apartments). Cockroach populations were assessed using sticky traps placed in kitchens, bedrooms, and living rooms for one to three days at baseline, three months, and six months. Homes needed to trap at least 10 cockroaches per day to qualify as infested, or zero to one cockroach to qualify as uninfested. Settled dust was vacuumed from kitchen and bedroom floors at all three time points using standardized protocols. Airborne dust was collected from heating and cooling system filters that were installed in each home and recovered after one month. Dust samples were analyzed for cockroach allergen Bla g 2 using ELISA and for endotoxin using the Kinetic Chromogenic LAL assay following established protocols. Intervention homes received commercial insecticidal gel baits placed throughout the entire apartment immediately after baseline sampling, with different baits applied at subsequent visits as needed. Laboratory studies measured endotoxin production by collecting feces from adult male and female German cockroaches over 24 hours under controlled conditions.

Results

At baseline, infested homes trapped an average of 47 cockroaches per day, with kitchens showing approximately 11 times more cockroaches than bedrooms. Kitchen dust in infested homes contained 17-fold higher Bla g 2 allergen concentrations compared to uninfested homes, while bedroom dust had nearly 21-fold higher levels. Endotoxin concentrations in kitchen dust averaged 177 units per milligram in infested homes, approximately double the 88 units per milligram found in uninfested homes. Laboratory studies showed that female cockroaches produced 2,900 endotoxin units per milligram of feces, more than twice the concentration in male feces (1,400 units per milligram), with each female excreting approximately 5,000 endotoxin units daily. The intervention reduced cockroach trap counts by 96% in treatment homes by three months, with counts remaining near zero through six months. Twelve of 15 intervention homes completely eliminated cockroaches. Kitchen dust Bla g 2 concentrations in intervention homes declined from 1,281 nanograms per gram at baseline to 129 nanograms per gram at six months, a tenfold reduction. Bedroom allergen levels showed similar patterns. Kitchen dust endotoxin concentrations in intervention homes decreased from 180 units per milligram to 69 units per milligram by six months, approaching levels in uninfested homes. Control homes that received no intervention maintained high cockroach numbers and allergen and endotoxin levels throughout the study. Statistical analysis revealed significant positive correlations between cockroach trap counts and both allergen concentrations (Spearman ρ = 0.612, P < 0.0001) and endotoxin concentrations (ρ = 0.515, P < 0.0001) in kitchen dust.

Limitations

The study enrolled a relatively small number of homes (37 total), which limits statistical power. The research focused on low-income multi-unit housing in a single city (Raleigh, North Carolina), so findings may not generalize to other geographic regions or housing types. The study did not directly measure health outcomes in asthmatic children, so the clinical impact of reducing cockroach-derived allergens and endotoxins on asthma symptoms and morbidity remains to be established. Study personnel were not blinded to treatment assignments, though objective measurements were used throughout. The follow-up period was limited to six months, so longer-term persistence of cockroach elimination and allergen/endotoxin reductions is unknown. Endotoxin analysis was conducted only at baseline and six months, not at the three-month intermediate time point. Marginal declines in cockroach counts observed in control homes over time may reflect seasonal effects or social interaction between neighbors, though the cause could not be definitively determined. Cockroach allergens are highly persistent, and reservoirs behind large appliances and in other hard-to-clean areas may continue redistributing allergens even after cockroach elimination without extensive abatement procedures.

Funding and Disclosures

This research was supported by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development Healthy Homes program (grants NCHHU0053-19 and NCHHU0081-24), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (2013-5-35 MBE), a Pilot Project from the Center for Human Health and the Environment (P30ES025128) funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1R21AI187857-01), Research Capacity Fund (Hatch Act project NC02639) from the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and the Blanton J. Whitmire Endowment at North Carolina State University. The authors declared no conflicts of interest. Commercial companies BASF, Envu, MGK, and Syngenta donated gel baits, and Woodstream donated cockroach traps for the study.

Publication Information

Kakumanu ML, DeVries ZC, Santangelo RG, Siegel J, Schal C. Indoor allergens and endotoxins in relation to cockroach infestations in low-income urban homes. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Global. 2026;5:100571. Published online September 26, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100571. The article is available as open access under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply