Doctors becoming overwhelmed by constant visits from ‘frequent attenders’

MANCHESTER, United Kingdom — Is there such a thing as going to the doctor too much? A new study finds family doctors are being overwhelmed by “frequent attenders” who visit their practices five times more often than other patients.

Researchers from the University of Manchester say these individuals make up around four in every 10 consultations. This isn’t a new trend either. The proportion of medical “regulars” has soared over the past two decades, years before the emergence of COVID-19.

The findings explain the rise in workloads for general practitioners (GP), with half believing the situation is risky.

“A relatively small number of patients are accounting for a large proportion of GP workload including face-to-face consultations,” says corresponding author Professor Evangelos Kontopantelis in a media release.

“Frequent attenders appear to be a major driver for the increase in consultations that have contributed to perceptions of increased workload in general practice,” the study author adds. “GPs should be looking at this group of patients more closely to understand who they are and why they are consulting more frequently.”

The findings come from an analysis of nearly 1.7 billion doctor’s appointments involving just 12.3 million patients over 20 years. The results also come after the pandemic has caused severe disruptions to medical practices over the last two years.

Doctors reaching their breaking point

GPs have repeatedly sounded the alarm on the increasing pressures of an aging population, the complexity of care, and initiatives to shift treatment from hospitals into the community. A poll earlier this year found doctors were working 11 hours a day on average and seeing 37 patients — a third more than what experts consider safe.

Now, this first study of its kind shows the top 10 percent of “frequent attenders” are responsible for roughly 40 percent of all doctor’s visits. This ratio is also increasing over time, particularly when it comes to face-to-face consultations, which are actually falling among other patients.

YouTube video

In-person care rose from an average of 38 percent in 2000–2001 to 43 percent in 2018–2019 and from an average of 38 to 40 percent for all practice staff.

The Manchester team drew on anonymized information in the Clinical Practice Research Database. It covered 845 surgeries across the U.K. between April 2000 and March 2019, with 113 contributing doctor’s offices throughout the entire period. Frequent attenders show up for an examination around five times as frequently as the average patient.

“While many of these patients may have comorbidities and may need to be seen regularly, research suggest that they have wider social and psychological needs,” the researchers write in the journal BMJ Open.

Who are the most frequent attenders?

The evidence across Europe reveals that frequent attenders are more likely to be female, older, and have more social and psychiatric problems. They are also more likely to be taking drugs for mental illness, have more medically unexplainable symptoms, and more long-term conditions.

The researchers looked at consulting patterns with all staff, including administrative employees, and only with GPs either face-to-face, remotely, or by phone. Those visits with all staff in a practice more than doubled, rising from an annual average of 11 per person in 2000–01 to 25 in 2018–19. For family doctors only, the equivalent figures were an annual average of five visits in 2000-01 to eight per person in 2015-18.

Among frequent attenders, all types of consultations with GPs rose from an average of 13 to 21 a year during the study. However, those consultations with other practice staff rose from an average of 27 a year to 60 between April 2000 and March 2019.

There was relatively little regional variation across the entire United Kingdon in any of the trends, but face-to-face consultations with GPs and all staff were highest in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

A prescription for more social contact

Typically, frequent attenders visit their family doctor between 20 to 40 times a year. Researchers note this is an observational study and can’t determine the exact cause of this trend, but health officials believe loneliness may be part of the issue.

The U.K.’s National Health Service recommends that GPs refer frequent attenders to activities within their local community. Known as “social prescribing,” this can include art classes, walking groups, dance lessons, and volunteering opportunities.

“The large increase in the general practice workload in the last 20 years means that having extended multidisciplinary teams to meet a wide range of patient needs through a range of ways (eg, remote consultations) is perhaps the only solution for sustaining a viable primary care,” study authors conclude in their report.

“It is also likely that a multidisciplinary workforce in general practice could also better address the wider, not always medical, needs of frequent attenders.”

South West News Service writer Mark Waghorn contributed to this report.


  1. If most attenders are Female then look at the retirement for women. Most women look after family members but if you can’t retire as the age has gone up possibly the time they would use as helping has stopped snd cannot look after themselves either due to no or little money. Ask the short sighted government who cause the problems.

  2. Perhaps these women’s’ very real medical problems are being written off as “mental illness” rather than finding answers, which is why they keep coming back over and over hoping for a diagnosis. Maybe rather than looking for the issue in the patients and “who they are” consider the care and ask them why they go to the doctor so much… I doubt it’s because they like to. Womens’ medical issues have been written off as emotional and psychological throughout history. It’s time for a change in mindset. More research and attention is needed rather than dismissal and annoyance from health professionals. Labeling them “frequent flyers” is and saying they are mentally I’ll is dismissive of what is likely the true underlying story.

    1. wholeheartedly agree!! Doctors who don’t have the intelligence nor skill to perform the correct and extensive differential diagnosis and diagnose & treat correctly are the ones who are burdened by these so called frequent flyers. Of course women get the brunt of this incompetence and as you said women have always been discriminated against by the medical professionals and viewed as neurotic, hypochondriacal, histrionic, skittish, and on and on.

      1. No doubt there is bias in medicine, but if the inability to diagnose is the fundamental problem, shouldn’t we see lower life expectancy for women than men? If these women’s conditions are severe enough to go to the doctor so frequently, shouldn’t it show in mortality statistics?

  3. I’m unsure if anyone will ever look at my comment including the author. There is a lot of misogyny within this article and the atitude toward “frequent flyers”. How about taking responsibility for the fact that if patients could get an accurate diagnosis and the correct treatment then maybe they wouldn’t be “frequent flyers”. Also the mental illness diagnoses thrown onto these “frequent flyers who happen to mostly women” is a very long standing practice that goes back to the beginning of modern medicine. Many many diseases both common and rare can manifest with many psychiatric &/or behavioral symptoms but it’s lazy ignorant doctors and psychiatrists who don’t perform an extensive differential diagnosis to get to the real cause of these patients problems. On more than one occasion I’ve been exposed to the incompetence of doctors, misdiagnosis, and even death due to their incompetence. SO let’s have a truthful dialogue about the real underlying problems of “frequent flyers” and increase your skills as diagnosticians !

Comments are closed.