Dog watching TV

It turns out even dogs are have preferences about what to watch on TV. (Photo by Javier Brosch on Shutterstock)

In A Nutshell

  • Most dogs do watch TV: In this large survey, 88.3% of dogs were reported to actively respond to television content.
  • Dogs have viewing styles: Researchers identified three types—animal-focused watchers, anticipatory followers, and cautious reactors to human or object content.
  • Personality matters: Excitable dogs tend to follow movement on screen, while anxious dogs react more strongly to non-animal content like human voices or doorbells.
  • Applications for dog welfare: Understanding these patterns could help improve shelter enrichment programs and tailor training strategies for pets who bark at the TV.

AUBURN, Ala. — Most pet owners have caught their dog staring intently at the television screen, but a groundbreaking study from Auburn University reveals that dogs are far more sophisticated viewers than anyone imagined. Rather than mindlessly watching whatever happens to be on, canines demonstrate distinct preferences based on content type and even exhibit personality-driven viewing habits that mirror human behavior.

Research published in Scientific Reports found that an overwhelming 88.3% of dogs actively watch television, with clear preferences for different types of programming. Dogs respond most enthusiastically to content featuring other animals while displaying more cautious reactions to human-centered shows.

“This study indicates that companion dogs experience a meaningful, object-filled world when they view television,” the researchers concluded.

How Scientists Measured What Dogs Like to Watch on TV

Between February and March 2024, the Auburn researchers surveyed 650 dog owners online, ultimately analyzing responses for 453 dogs whose owners confirmed their pets watch TV. Scientists created the “Dog Television Viewing Scale (DTVS)”, a comprehensive questionnaire examining how dogs react to different visual and auditory content.

Instead of simple yes-or-no questions about TV watching, researchers explored specific behaviors: Does the dog follow objects that move off-screen? Do they bark at certain sounds? How do they react to different animals versus humans or inanimate objects like cars?

The survey also included established psychological assessments measuring dog temperament, including excitement levels, anxiety, and impulsivity. Dogs in the study ranged from four months to 16 years old, representing all seven American Kennel Club breed groups with both mixed breeds and purebreds included.

Woman watching TV with her dog
Ever notice how dogs often have strong reactions to what’s on the TV screen? Turns out there are certain patterns to their viewing preferences. (Photo by PeopleImages.com – Yuri A on Shutterstock)

Dogs Show Three Distinct TV Viewing Patterns

Statistical analysis revealed three primary patterns explaining how dogs interact with television content, showing that dogs categorize TV programming much like humans do, but with distinctly canine priorities.

Animal-Focused Viewers: Dogs showed heightened interest in programs featuring other dogs, household pets like cats, and wild animals. The first component accounted for 24.5% of the total variance and consisted of questions related to non-human animal stimuli, which researchers labeled “DTVS Animal.”

Following Behavior: Some dogs exhibited what researchers termed “anticipatory following,” tracking objects moving across the screen and even looking behind the television as if expecting to find the disappeared subject. The second component accounted for 21.4% of the total variance and consisted of questions related to following behaviors, labeled “DTVS Follow.”

Cautious Watchers: The third component accounted for 17.8% of the total variance and consisted of questions related to inanimate objects and humans, labeled “DTVS Non-Animal.” Dogs with higher anxiety levels were more likely to react strongly to these non-animal subjects.

The study found that dogs showed no significant difference between processing visual versus auditory information. Whether seeing a cat on screen or hearing a meow through speakers, dogs categorized experiences by content type rather than how they received the information.

Personality Shapes How Dogs Watch TV

The connection between dog personality and viewing preferences proved most revealing. Dogs showed temperament-based viewing patterns similar to how humans might prefer different types of entertainment.

Highly excitable dogs were significantly more likely to exhibit following behaviors, potentially mistaking TV content for real-world encounters. These dogs might attempt to chase a tennis ball rolling across the screen or peer behind the television searching for a disappeared squirrel.

Dogs with anxious or fearful tendencies showed stronger reactions to non-animal content, particularly responding to sounds like doorbells, car horns, or human voices. For dog owners dealing with pets who bark excessively at television programming, understanding these personality connections could prove valuable.

Factors like age, sex, breed group, or previous TV exposure had little impact on viewing preferences, indicating that TV watching behavior may be more innate than learned.

Pair of dogs watching TV
A dog’s disposition plays a central role in their television program preferences. (Photo by Javier Brosch on Shutterstock)

How This Study Could Improve Life for Shelter Dogs and Pets

These discoveries extend beyond understanding canine entertainment preferences. The research has practical applications for animal welfare, particularly in shelter environments where television programming is sometimes used as enrichment for confined dogs.

Previous studies examining TV as shelter enrichment showed mixed results. Armed with this new understanding of canine viewing preferences, shelter operators might achieve better outcomes by selecting programming that matches individual dogs’ temperaments.

For dog owners dealing with problematic TV-related behaviors — such as excessive barking or destructive attempts to “catch” on-screen animals — the personality insights could inform training approaches. An anxious dog might benefit from gradual exposure to trigger sounds, while an overly excitable dog might need redirection exercises.

The research also contributes to broader animal cognition studies. Scientists frequently use 2D visual materials in experiments with dogs, and these findings validate such approaches. If dogs process television images as meaningful representations of real objects, laboratory studies using screens may more accurately reflect how dogs perceive their actual environment.

As work-from-home arrangements become more common and pet ownership continues rising, understanding canine media consumption becomes increasingly relevant. Dogs left alone during the day might benefit from carefully curated programming that provides mental stimulation without triggering anxiety or destructive behaviors.

For millions of pet owners who have long suspected their dogs show genuine interest in television programming, science has finally provided confirmation. Dogs don’t just passively absorb whatever flickers across the screen. They actively process, categorize, and respond to content based on both its nature and their own personality traits.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers distributed an online survey to dog owners via social media from February to March 2024, collecting responses about 650 dogs. After removing incomplete and duplicate responses, 513 responses remained. Once dogs with “no” responses to watching television were removed, 453 responses remained in the final analysis. The survey included the newly developed Dog Television Viewing Scale (DTVS) with 16 questions about how dogs react to different types of TV content, plus established temperament assessments measuring traits like excitement and anxiety. Dogs ranged from 4 months to 16 years old and represented all major breed groups.

Results

The study found that 88.3% of dogs in the original sample watched TV. Statistical analysis revealed three main viewing patterns: animal-focused responses (dogs reacting most to other animals), following behaviors (dogs tracking objects across screens), and non-animal responses (reactions to humans and objects). Dog personality significantly influenced viewing preferences—excitable dogs showed more following behaviors, while anxious dogs reacted more strongly to non-animal content. Age, sex, breed, and TV exposure had no significant impact on viewing habits.

Limitations

The study relied on owner self-reporting rather than direct observation, which could introduce bias in behavior interpretation. There was also self-selection bias, as owners of TV-watching dogs were more likely to participate. The research couldn’t determine population-wide TV viewing rates since most respondents had dogs that already watched television. Additionally, the study couldn’t control for factors like TV size, programming types, or daily routines that might influence viewing behavior.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was approved by Auburn University’s Institutional Review Board (Protocol # 23-666 EX 2402). The authors declared no competing interests, and data availability was offered upon request from the corresponding author.

Publication Information

“Characterizing TV viewing habits in companion dogs” by Lane I. Montgomery, Sarah Krichbaum, and Jeffrey S. Katz was published in Scientific Reports, volume 15, article number 20274, on July 17, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06580-y.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply