Earth’s layers

Elements of this image furnished by NASA. (© rost9 - stock.adobe.com)

There may be hidden layers to Earth’s core dictated by chemical composition.

In A Nutshell

  • Lab experiments suggest Earth’s inner core may have distinct chemical layers rather than being uniform iron, with silicon and carbon concentrations potentially increasing from center to edge
  • Scientists squeezed iron-silicon-carbon alloys to extreme pressures and found they produce low seismic wave anisotropy (~2%), matching observations from the outer inner core, while pure iron shows higher anisotropy matching the center
  • The layered structure could have formed naturally as the core crystallized from the inside out over geological time, with temperature and pressure gradients causing lightweight elements to concentrate in outer layers
  • This chemical stratification may help explain long-standing puzzles about how seismic waves behave differently at various depths within the inner core

Deep beneath the surface of our planet lies the Earth’s core, a solid ball of iron under crushing pressure. Now, however, scientists conducting laboratory experiments have found evidence suggesting it may not be a uniform sphere after all.

Instead, lab tests on iron mixed with silicon and carbon show properties consistent with a layered structure, with different chemical compositions at different depths. If correct, this hidden structure would have formed as the core crystallized from the center outward, naturally sorting lightweight elements toward the outer layers while leaving the center more iron-rich.

The work addresses a puzzle that has bothered geophysicists for decades. When earthquake waves travel through the inner core, they move at different speeds depending on which direction they’re headed, a property called anisotropy. Stranger still, this effect isn’t uniform. The outer portions of the inner core show weak anisotropy while the central region shows much stronger anisotropy. A compelling explanation has been difficult to pin down – until now.

A research team at the University of Münster in Germany may have found an answer by recreating inner core conditions in their lab. They squeezed iron mixed with small amounts of silicon and carbon (proportions scientists think may match the actual core) to crushing pressures in a diamond vise while heating it to extreme temperatures. When they measured how this material would affect seismic waves, something clicked: the silicon-carbon mixture showed low anisotropy, roughly consistent with what seismologists infer for the outer portion of the inner core. Pure iron, by contrast, showed high anisotropy matching observations from the center.

The results, published in Nature Communications, suggest Earth’s core could be chemically stratified rather than uniform.

3D illustration showing layers of the Earth in space
Illustration depicting Earth’s layers and inner core. (Image by DestinaDesign on Shutterstock)

How Freezing Iron Could Have Created Layers

The core didn’t start out solid. As Earth cooled over geological time, conditions at the center eventually allowed iron to begin crystallizing despite the crushing pressure. That process continues today, with the boundary between solid inner core and liquid outer core slowly advancing outward.

Crucially, as molten iron freezes onto the growing inner core, silicon and carbon get incorporated at levels that depend on temperature and pressure. Studies of iron alloys show that cooler temperatures and lower pressures both favor more silicon and carbon dissolving into solid iron. Since pressure drops as you move from center to edge, each successive layer that crystallized could have incorporated progressively more of these lightweight elements.

Think of it like making rock candy. As sugar solution slowly crystallizes, different conditions at different times can create layers with slightly different properties. Except this is 800 miles across, made of iron instead of sugar, and formed over vast stretches of geological time. If the model is correct, the oldest, most iron-rich material sits at the center while younger, more silicon-and-carbon-rich material forms the outer layers.

Squeezing Samples to Extreme Pressures

The team couldn’t drill to the core, obviously. Instead, they brought approximations of core conditions to a lab in Germany using diamond anvil cells, which are devices that squeeze microscopic samples between two diamonds to create enormous pressures. They also heated the samples with electrical resistance.

The experiments hit pressures up to 128 gigapascals and temperatures up to 1,100 Kelvin. That’s not quite as extreme as the actual inner core, which experiences roughly three times more pressure and much higher temperatures; but close enough to help constrain models that project the behavior to true core conditions.

Powerful X-rays from a synchrotron facility revealed how the samples’ crystal structure deformed under stress. When iron is squeezed in one direction, the atomic layers can shift and align. This alignment controls how seismic waves travel through the material. By measuring the alignment in their tiny samples, the researchers could predict what earthquake waves might experience passing through a planetary volume of the same material.

An overview of the experimental setup at DESY in Hamburg reveals the vacuum chamber housing the high-temperature diamond anvil cell.
An overview of the experimental setup at DESY in Hamburg reveals the vacuum chamber housing the high-temperature diamond anvil cell: The cell’s orange colour comes from the light it emits at high temperatures. (Credit: Carmen Sánchez-Valle)

Silicon and Carbon Change the Picture

The key finding: pure iron and the silicon-carbon alloy behave quite differently. Pure iron squeezed and heated to conditions approaching the core’s develops strong alignment that can make seismic waves travel several percent faster in one direction than another, often on the order of 6-7% in models. The iron-silicon-carbon mixture? Closer to 2%.

That’s consistent with what seismologists observe. The outer portion of the inner core shows roughly 2% anisotropy. The central region shows higher values, around 4-6%. If silicon and carbon concentrations increase toward the edge, as the crystallization process would predict, the seismic observations align with the laboratory findings.

The research also revealed that adding carbon strengthens the iron alloy significantly, making it more resistant to deformation. This affects how the material could develop its aligned structure over geological time as the core continues to evolve.

Why This Matters Beyond Cool Science

More broadly, because the core helps power Earth’s magnetic field through churning motions in the liquid outer core, understanding the solid inner core’s structure matters for modeling how this magnetic shield works. The field protects Earth’s surface from harmful solar radiation and has helped maintain habitable conditions over geological history.

Chemical layers in the solid inner core could influence heat flow and interactions at the boundary with the liquid outer core, potentially affecting the magnetic field’s pattern and stability. Knowing the inner core may have stratified structure helps scientists build better models of these deep Earth processes.

The proposed layered structure would also preserve a unique archive of Earth’s thermal history over deep geological time. Because crystallization proceeded from center outward, the chemical composition at different depths could record conditions spanning a vast stretch of our planet’s evolution. It’s information locked in iron that will never see sunlight but might reveal the story of Earth’s interior across the ages.

Scientists studying Earth’s interior must combine laboratory experiments on microscopic samples, seismic observations from earthquake waves, and computer simulations to understand regions thousands of miles deep that no one will ever directly observe. This research shows how that approach can reveal processes hidden in the most inaccessible place on Earth. The core may be unreachable, but careful experiments are steadily narrowing the range of possibilities.


Paper Notes

Limitations

The experiments reached pressures and temperatures approaching but not fully matching inner core conditions, requiring mathematical extrapolation of the results. While the modeling techniques employed are well-established and validated, some uncertainty remains in projecting to conditions more extreme than those achieved experimentally. The study examined one specific alloy composition (2 weight percent silicon, 0.4 weight percent carbon); the inner core’s actual composition may differ somewhat, and other light elements like oxygen, sulfur, or hydrogen may also be present. During some high-temperature experiments, a small amount of iron carbide (Fe3C) formed, slightly altering the sample composition and potentially affecting the measurements.

Funding and Disclosures

This research was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through project KU 3832/2-1 and co-funded by the European Union through the European Research Council (ERC) project LECOR (project number 101042572). The authors acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany), a member of the Helmholtz Association, for providing synchrotron beamtime. Part of the experiments were carried out at beamline P02.2 using facilities provided by the Extreme Condition Science Infrastructure (ECSI) of PETRA III. The authors declare no competing interests.

Publication Details

Authors: Efim Kolesnikov, Xiang Li, Susanne C. Müller, Arno Rohrbach, Stephan Klemme, Jasper Berndt, Hanns-Peter Liermann, Carmen Sanchez-Valle, and Ilya Kupenko

Affiliations: Institute for Mineralogy, University of Münster, Germany; ESRF (The European Synchrotron), Grenoble, France; Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany; Univ. Lille, CNRS, INRAE, Centrale Lille, UMR 8207 – UMET, France

Journal: Nature Communications | Volume/Issue: Volume 16, Article number 10986| DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-67067-y | Received: October 28, 2024; Accepted: November 21, 2025; Published online: December 8, 2025

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply