Women in a meeting or interview

(Photo by Tim Gouw on Unsplash)

BOSTON — America has a gender pay gap problem, but it apparently starts before women even start going on interviews. A new study finds pay gap issues actually start during the job search. As of 2020, women make 84 percent of what men earn — or 84 cents for every dollar their male colleagues make. Part of the problem, researchers from Boston University say, is that women are more likely to accept job offers earlier than men. Male jobseekers, on the other hand, are willing to wait longer for higher pay.

Looking for a job is a complicated process, and a lot of factors play into whether you want to settle or hold out for a better opportunity. For example, the study finds people living in a recession will likely see lower wages for at least 10 years compared to people who enter the job market during better economic times. Moreover, your personal beliefs in your career search, such as a scarcity mindset or doubting your earning potential, could affect whether you accept a job that’s below your actual pay grade.

The study authors asked graduates from the 2013-2019 graduating classes of Boston University’s business school about their job search process. This included accepted and rejected offers, salary and other benefits, details of the job itself, job offer timing, and whether they ultimately accepted the offer. For the two most recent classes, the team also asked about the students’ subjective beliefs about the number of offers and wage offers they would receive.

Woman on job interview
(© contrastwerkstatt – stock.adobe.com)

Men typically take more risks with job offers

Results show women accepted positions one month earlier than men. For example, 60 percent of women accepted a job before graduation compared to 52 percent of men. There was a clear gender gap in accepted offers as well, with women being more likely to accept one of the first few offers they received. The gender gap for accepted offers went down after graduation.

According to the study authors, men have a greater risk tolerance and overconfidence when it comes to their salary potential. Therefore, they are more willing to hold out until an offer meets their standards. People who like to play it safe reported accepting lower wages and taking offers earlier in the process. Overall, risk preferences explained 20 percent of the gender pay gap in job searches.

“Our study shows that differences in the way men and women search for jobs matter for gender pay gaps in early career,” says Patricia Cortes, a researcher at Boston University and the paper’s lead author, in a media release. “Gender differences in risk preferences and overconfidence about future job offers result in women having lower reservation earnings, which translates into earlier acceptance of lower-paying job offers. Gender differences in these traits may explain as much as 30% of the difference between men’s and women’s earnings in their first jobs.”

The study is published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics.

You might also be interested in:

About Jocelyn Solis-Moreira

Jocelyn is a New York-based science journalist whose work has appeared in Discover Magazine, Health, and Live Science, among other publications. She holds a Master's of Science in Psychology with a concentration in behavioral neuroscience and a Bachelor's of Science in integrative neuroscience from Binghamton University. Jocelyn has reported on several medical and science topics ranging from coronavirus news to the latest findings in women's health.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

2 Comments

  1. D C M says:

    Spoiled.

  2. Scott Mahrle says:

    A few casual comments about this. First, I appreciate that the author has dared to touch a subject with a thesis that undermines the idea that society is inherently sexist. Refreshing to see a straightforward review of as study without couching it in apologies.

    Second, I’m not sure why the author (or is it the authors of the study?) assumes the gender pay gap is a problem. If the pay gap reflects people’s free choices—and women prefer to take a less-risky path and men prefer a riskier path, and both are happy with their choices, and the gender pay gap is a natural result of these choices—why is the gender pay gap a problem?

    Third, why is men’s level of confidence called “overconfidence”? The prefix “over” implies “too much,” and that the level of confidence is a bad thing. Well it seems to be paying off in terms of pay. So men have too much confidence, but lucky-for-them it pays off for them? Doesn’t make any sense. The term is not “overconfidence,” it’s just “relatively greater confidence.”

    Fourth, is that a picture of Elizabeth Holmes at the top of the page?