Soaking in hot water proves to be the most effective heat therapy method for boosting your health. (fast-stock/Shutterstock)
In a nutshell
- Hot water immersion significantly outperformed both traditional and infrared saunas, leading to greater increases in core body temperature, heart rate, cardiac output, and reductions in blood pressure—mimicking the benefits of moderate-intensity exercise.
- Only hot water immersion triggered measurable immune responses, including spikes in interleukin-6 and increases in natural killer cells and cytotoxic T-cells up to 48 hours later, suggesting potential long-term immune benefits.
- The study highlights how hot baths offer a practical, affordable way to gain cardiovascular and immune system benefits, challenging the trend of expensive sauna therapies and underscoring the importance of consistent, sustained heat exposure for maximum effects.
EUGENE, Ore. — If you’re looking to boost your cardiovascular health without breaking a sweat at the gym, you might want to skip the trendy sauna sessions and head straight for a hot bath instead. A new study comparing three popular heat therapy methods found that soaking in hot water delivers more powerful health benefits than either traditional or infrared saunas.
Scientists at the University of Oregon put 20 healthy young adults through three different heating sessions and discovered that hot water immersion leads to the greatest thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses compared to saunas. Wellness influencers have been touting expensive sauna treatments as the ultimate health hack, but taking a hot bath might be a cheaper, at-home way to achieve the same results.
The findings, published in the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, tackle the current heat therapy trend dominated by high-end sauna studios and infrared therapy sessions. Instead, the study shows that something as simple as a 45-minute soak in hot water creates more dramatic physiological changes than sitting in a traditional sauna or a far infrared sauna.
Comparing Three Types of Heat Therapy
Researchers designed their experiment to mirror how people actually use these heating methods rather than create artificial laboratory scenarios. Twenty participants, split evenly between men and women and with an average age of 24, underwent three separate heating sessions spaced at least a week apart.
Each session followed a different protocol. For hot water immersion, participants soaked up to their sternum (chest bone) in 104.9°F water for 45 minutes. The traditional sauna session involved three 10-minute rounds at 176°F (though actual measured temperature was 151°F) with 5-minute breaks at room temperature between sessions. Far infrared sauna participants sat for 45 minutes in temperatures that were set to start at 115°F and gradually increase to 149°F, though the actual measured temperature averaged 113°F.
Scientists monitored core body temperature every five minutes and measured heart function before, during, and after each session. They also collected blood samples to examine inflammatory markers and immune cell activity immediately after heating and again at 24 and 48 hours later.
Hot Water Wins
Hot water immersion increased participants’ core body temperature by an average of 1.98°F, while traditional sauna raised it by just 0.72°F, and infrared sauna caused virtually no increase at all. This temperature difference triggered a cascade of physiological responses that set hot water apart from its sauna competitors.
Heart rates jumped by 39 beats per minute during hot water immersion compared to 34 beats per minute in traditional saunas and 25 beats per minute in infrared saunas. Cardiac output, which is how hard your heart works to pump blood, increased by 3.7 liters per minute in hot water. This is significantly more than the 2.3 liters per minute increase in traditional saunas or the 1.6 liters per minute boost in infrared saunas.
Soaking in hot water also lowered blood pressure the most. Mean arterial pressure (the average pressure in arteries during a heartbeat cycle) dropped by 15 mmHg in the hot tub compared to just 4 mmHg in traditional saunas and virtually no change in infrared saunas. This mirrors what happens during moderate-intensity exercise, suggesting hot water immersion could serve as an alternative for people unable to engage in traditional physical activity.
How Hot Water Boosts The Immune System
Only hot water immersion triggered immune system changes. Participants showed increased levels of interleukin-6, an inflammatory marker that plays a beneficial role in the body’s adaptive response to stress. This same inflammatory response occurs after exercise.
Additionally, natural killer cells and certain T-cells increased 24 and 48 hours after hot water sessions. These immune cells help the body fight infections and potentially cancerous cells, suggesting that hot water immersion might provide lasting immune system benefits beyond the immediate session.
Why Hot Water is So Effective
Water conducts heat 24 times more efficiently than air, allowing for rapid and uniform heat transfer to the body. When you’re submerged in hot water, your entire body surface receives consistent heating, unlike saunas, where the air temperature varies and your body can cool through sweating. Being submerged in water reduces the body’s ability to cool itself through sweat evaporation.
Researchers also discovered important discrepancies between sauna settings and actual temperatures. When they measured actual temperatures inside commercially available saunas, they found the traditional sauna set to 176°F actually measured only 151°F with their research-grade instruments, while the infrared sauna averaged 113°F despite being programmed for higher temperatures. Many people using saunas aren’t experiencing the intense heat levels they think they are, potentially limiting the health benefits.

For people considering heat therapy as part of their wellness routine, a simple hot bath might be more effective than expensive sauna memberships. The study participants tolerated 45 minutes of hot water immersion well, though they did report feeling warmer and less comfortable than during sauna sessions.
The research also revealed that traditional sauna protocols with cooling breaks, common in Finnish sauna culture, might actually limit the therapeutic benefits by allowing core body temperature to drop between heating rounds. Continuous heating seems to be more beneficial for triggering the desired physiological responses.
“It can be a very peaceful, sometimes religious, sometimes cultural, and sometimes social experience,” says study author Christopher Minson from the University of Oregon, in a statement. “And I think those aspects contribute to the health benefits and are critically important.”
Still, the study focused on young, healthy adults who were recreationally active. Whether these findings apply to older adults, people with health conditions, or sedentary people has not been determined yet. Minson stresses the importance of medical clearance before beginning any heat therapy regimen.
“We want people to be smart and safe about it,” he adds. “We need to make sure that they are cleared by their physicians or others for heat therapy or for exercise, whether it’s mild to moderate walking or jogging or strength training. Then they’ll be fine to do heat therapy.”
Wellness trends come and go, but this research provides solid evidence that a hot bath at home can be a legitimate way to boost your health. For maximum cardiovascular and immune system benefits, science points toward the simple pleasure of a long, hot soak—no expensive spa membership required.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Scientists recruited 20 healthy young adults (10 men, 10 women, average age 24) to compare three heat therapy methods. Each participant completed three heating sessions separated by at least one week: hot water immersion at 104.9°F for 45 minutes, traditional sauna with three 10-minute rounds at 176°F (measured at 151°F) with 5-minute cooling breaks, and far infrared sauna for 45 minutes starting at 115°F and increasing to 149°F (measured average 113°F). Researchers measured core body temperature every five minutes, heart function at baseline, midway, and end of heating, and collected blood samples before heating, immediately after, and at 24 and 48 hours later to analyze inflammatory markers and immune cell populations.
Results
Hot water immersion produced the most significant physiological changes across all measured parameters. Core body temperature increased by 1.98°F (compared to 0.72°F in traditional sauna and virtually no change in infrared sauna). Heart rate increased by 39 beats per minute, cardiac output rose by 3.7 liters per minute, and mean arterial pressure dropped by 15 mmHg—all significantly greater than sauna conditions. Only hot water immersion triggered immune system responses, including increased interleukin-6 levels immediately after heating and elevated natural killer cells and CD8+ T-cells at 24-48 hours post-heating.
Limitations
The study included only young, healthy, recreationally active adults, limiting generalizability to older populations or those with health conditions. Participants were not accustomed to regular heat therapy, which might affect responses. The research examined only acute effects of single sessions rather than long-term adaptations from repeated exposure. Different core temperature measurement methods (rectal thermometer vs. telemetry pill) showed some variation in traditional sauna results. The study did not account for menstrual cycle phases in female participants.
Funding and Disclosures
This research was supported by American Heart Association Grant 19TPA34890033 and National Institutes of Health Grant R01HL144128. The authors declared no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
Publication Information
The paper “Comparison of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses to different passive heat therapy modalities” is authored by Jessica K. Atencio, Emma L. Reed, Karen Wiedenfeld Needham, Kathryn M. Lucernoni, Lindan N. Comrada, John R. Halliwill, and Christopher T. Minson from the Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon. It was published in the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (Volume 329, pages R20-R35) in 2025.








How do you keep a bathtub at that temperature? The water starts to get cold after 5 minutes.
The article claims that the actual sauna temp was only 151-degrees F. This is too anemic to be considered a sauna. A solid sauna operates in the range 190-205 degrees F, and is not done in ten-minute intervals. Instead, you remain in the sauna continuously until you cannot take it any longer. This study needs to be re-done using an authentic sauna experience.
Hot baths are amazing. I lose two lbs. of water weight when I soak. Epsom salt (4 cup), lavender EO (10-20 drops of the cheap stuff), baking soda (1 cup). The hottest you can go in is 115, 120 will burn you, start lower and work your way up. In between 5-10 minutes soak you will want to get out, push through it, the urge will pass or your to hot. Bring drinking water, a little something to read, music what have you. I can go an hour. Benefits? Forced relaxation, dilates blood vessels, opens everything up, pain reliever.
So instead of a hot bath I assume that a whirlpool hot tub at my gym is as good?
What they don’t tell you: Heat opens your pores and if you keep taking hot showers for years and years, your pores lose their ability to close tightly around the shafts and you lose the hair.
“Studies” like these are bogus, and this website will publish any bogus garbage that has the word “study” in it. Just read them and you’ll see it.