5G network

(Credit: © Mikhail Primakov | Dreamstime.com)

Rural cell phone users face higher radiation levels despite fewer cell towers, study finds

BARCELONA — When it comes to mobile phone radiation, living in a city with abundant cell towers might actually reduce your exposure. This seemingly paradoxical conclusion emerges from new research examining how 5G technology is changing our electromagnetic environment across urban and rural landscapes.

Switzerland, an early adopter of 5G technology in Europe, provided an ideal testing ground for this research. After introducing new frequency bands in 2019, including the crucial 3.5 GHz band used by 5G networks, the country became perfectly positioned to study how these advanced networks influence our daily exposure to electromagnetic fields.

Modern 5G networks employ sophisticated antenna systems that function quite differently from previous cellular technologies. These systems, called massive Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (Ma-MIMO) antennas, can direct focused beams of signal precisely toward users’ devices. Consider it like a spotlight following an actor on stage rather than flooding the entire theater with light. This targeted approach, known as beamforming, marks a significant shift from older cellular networks that broadcast signals more uniformly across wide areas.

The research team, part of Project GOLIAT, collected measurements across two major Swiss cities (Zurich and Basel) and three rural villages (Hergiswil, Willisau, and Dagmersellen). In their baseline measurements, taken with phones in airplane mode, they found that exposure levels increased with population density. Rural villages experienced average exposure levels of 0.17 milliwatts per square meter (mW/m²), while the cities of Basel and Zurich recorded higher averages of 0.33 and 0.48 mW/m² respectively.

“The highest levels were found in urban business areas and public transport, which were still more than a hundred times below the international guideline values,” says study senior author Martin Röösli, a researcher at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, in a statement.

When researchers simulated intensive data usage by downloading large files repeatedly, exposure levels increased significantly to averages of 6-7 mW/m². This increase was particularly noticeable in urban areas, where 5G networks use beamforming to direct stronger signals to active devices.

Cell phone tower
More cell towers could mean less phone radiation exposure, the paradoxical study reveals. (© Vichai Laorapeepornthong | Dreamstime.com)

The most compelling findings emerged during tests of maximum upload speeds, where devices continuously sent large files to the network. During these tests, exposure levels reached an average of 16 mW/m² in cities but jumped to 29 mW/m² in villages. This unexpected result occurs because phones in rural areas must work harder to maintain connections with distant cell towers.

“We have to keep in mind that in our study the phone was about 30 cm away from the measuring device, which means that our results might underestimate the real exposure,” says study lead author Adriana Fernandes Veludo. “A mobile phone user will hold the phone closer to the body and thus the exposure to RF-EMF could be up to 10 times higher.”

“Environmental exposure is lower when base station density is low. However, in such a situation, the emission from mobile phones is by orders of magnitude higher,” This creates what Veludo describes as a paradoxical situation. “This has the paradoxical consequence that a typical mobile phone user is more exposed to RF-EMF in areas with low base station density.”

As this research expands beyond Switzerland’s borders to nine more European nations, scientists will track how different approaches to 5G implementation affect electromagnetic exposure levels. Their findings will help inform the ongoing debate about optimal cellular network design and its implications for public health.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers selected five study areas across Switzerland with varying degrees of urbanization. They carried specialized equipment including the ExpoM-RF 4 exposimeter, which measures 35 different frequency bands, and a test phone equipped with monitoring software. The equipment was carried in a specially designed backpack to minimize interference. Measurements were taken in various microenvironments like city centers, residential areas, and public transport, with each location measured for approximately 15 minutes during working hours.

Results

The study found three distinct patterns of exposure: environmental exposure (without active device use) was highest in urban business areas at 1.02 mW/m²; download-related exposure increased due to 5G frequencies, particularly in urban areas; and upload-related exposure was highest in rural areas, reaching up to 37.50 mW/m². The 5G frequency band at 3.5 GHz and the 2.1 GHz band were the primary contributors to exposure during active use.

Limitations

The researchers acknowledged several limitations, including potential body shielding effects from the measurement equipment, the temporal resolution of the measuring device, and the inability to distinguish between downlink and uplink signals in the 5G frequency band due to its time-division nature. Additionally, the study only used one type of phone and one mobile provider, which may not represent all possible scenarios.

Discussion and Takeaways

The research demonstrates that while environmental RF-EMF exposure remains similar to previous studies, active data transmission significantly increases exposure levels. The study also highlights the importance of considering both urban and rural environments when assessing RF-EMF exposure, as patterns differ significantly between these settings. This information is valuable for epidemiological research and risk assessment.

Funding and Disclosures

The study was funded by the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101057262, with additional support from various institutions including the Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III. The authors declared no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence their work.

Publication Details

This study, titled “Exploring RF-EMF levels in Swiss microenvironments: An evaluation of environmental and auto-induced downlink and uplink exposure in the era of 5G,” was published in Environmental Research (Volume 266, 2025). The research was conducted by an international team led by researchers from the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and the University of Basel, in collaboration with institutions across Europe.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

  1. SilverShil0h says:

    My husband is sensitive to EMFs. We have completely overhauled our lifestyle because of it. He was not sensitive to EMFs until 61. I could recommend a website I trust for suggestions but it might be against policy on this site, so I won’t. There are a lot of scam artists when it comes to EMFs so always research carefully prior to purchasing an EMF damage mitigation products.