Hearing loss test

Audiologist doing impedance audiometry or diagnosis of hearing impairment. (© Dusko - stock.adobe.com)

In a nutshell

  • Researchers successfully restored hearing in 10 deaf participants aged 18 months to 24 years using gene therapy, proving the treatment works beyond early childhood
  • All patients showed hearing improvements within one month, with some achieving nearly normal hearing and ability to have conversations without hearing aids
  • The therapy proved safe with only mild side effects, opening doors for treating other genetic forms of deafness in the future

NANJING, China — A groundbreaking clinical trial has achieved what many thought impossible: restoring meaningful hearing in people born profoundly deaf, including teenagers and young adults who were previously considered too old for such treatment.

Researchers in China successfully used gene therapy to improve hearing in 10 participants ranging from 18 months to nearly 24 years old, dramatically expanding the age range where this revolutionary treatment can work. Some patients went from being unable to hear anything to having conversations with their families within months of treatment.

“Participant 4 was able to carry on daily conversation with her mom 4 months after treatment without activating the cochlear implant and lipreading,” the researchers noted in their study published in Nature Medicine. Another patient could identify specific words like “scissors,” “excavator,” “tomato,” and “banana” just one month after receiving the therapy.

This represents a major breakthrough for people with a genetic condition called DFNB9 deafness. Unlike traditional hearing aids or cochlear implants that amplify or bypass damaged parts of the ear, this gene therapy actually repairs the underlying genetic defect causing deafness.

Deaf child with cochlear implant and hearing aid
In addition to hearing aids, cochlear implants are a common treatment for people who suffer from hearing loss.(© Laurentiu Iordache – stock.adobe.com)

How This Gene Therapy Works for Deafness

DFNB9 deafness affects people born with faulty versions of the OTOF gene. This gene produces a protein called otoferlin that’s essential for transmitting sound signals from the ear to the brain. Without working otoferlin, the ear can’t properly convert sound waves into the electrical signals the brain needs to perceive hearing.

The treatment works by injecting a modified virus carrying healthy copies of the OTOF gene directly into the inner ear. The virus acts like a molecular delivery truck, carrying the healthy genes specifically to hair cells in the inner ear where they’re needed most.

Surgeons access the inner ear through the mastoid bone behind the ear, the same approach used for cochlear implant surgery. A hair-thin needle then delivers 30-40 microliters of the gene therapy solution through a thin membrane into the inner ear’s fluid-filled chambers.

Age Ranges: How Teens and Adults Responded

All 10 participants showed hearing improvements within the first month of treatment. On average, participants’ hearing improved from baseline levels of 106 decibels to 52 decibels. That’s roughly the difference between needing to shout to be heard and being able to have a normal conversation.

The therapy worked well beyond infancy and early childhood, ages previously thought to represent the only window for successful intervention. A 14.5-year-old participant improved from profound deafness to being able to hear sounds at 59 decibels, while a 23-year-old adult showed meaningful hearing gains.

However, participants between 5 and 8 years old showed the most dramatic improvements, with some achieving nearly normal hearing. Younger toddlers and older participants still benefited but showed more modest gains. As the researchers noted: “The poor outcome in these toddlers is counterintuitive, as younger ages should be associated with better outcomes because ‘young’ inner ears presumably have more complete cellular structure and better-preserved functions.”

Child with hearing loss or deafness at doctor's office getting hearing aid or ear implant
About 2 to 3 out of every 1,000 children in the United States are born with a detectable level of hearing loss in one or both ears, according to the CDC. (© Mediteraneo – stock.adobe.com)

Safety and Side Effects: What the Trial Found

Throughout the 12-month follow-up period, the treatment proved remarkably safe. All 162 adverse events reported were mild to moderate, with the most common being decreased neutrophil counts in blood tests. This is a manageable side effect that didn’t require treatment.

One participant received a second injection in the same ear four months after the first, demonstrating that repeat treatments are both safe and potentially beneficial for optimizing results. Most hearing improvement occurred within the first month, with benefits maintaining or slightly improving over the following months.

What This Means for Future Deafness Treatments

While this gene therapy only works for DFNB9 deafness, which accounts for a small percentage of genetic hearing loss cases, the success opens doors for developing similar treatments for other genetic forms of deafness. The study represents a proof-of-concept that gene therapy can safely and effectively restore hearing when properly targeted.

“This is a huge step forward in the genetic treatment of deafness, one that can be life-changing for children and adults,” says Maoli Duan, a consultant and docent at the Karolinska Institutet, Sweden, and one of the study’s corresponding authors, in a statement. “Hearing was greatly improved in many of the participants, which can have a profound effect on their life quality. We will now be following these patients to see how lasting the effect is.”

For families affected by genetic hearing loss, this research transforms what was once a permanent condition into something that might be treatable, regardless of whether that person is 2 or 22 years old. The trial continues with plans to follow participants for five years to assess long-term safety and durability of hearing improvements.

With only 10 participants, including just one adult, larger trials are needed to confirm these results across diverse populations. Researchers are working to expand enrollment to better understand optimal timing and dosing strategies for this revolutionary approach to treating inherited deafness.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers conducted a multicenter clinical trial across five hospitals in China, enrolling 10 participants aged 1.5 to 23.9 years with DFNB9 deafness caused by mutations in the OTOF gene. Participants received a single injection of AAV-OTOF gene therapy delivered directly into the inner ear through the round window membrane via a surgical approach through the mastoid bone. The treatment used a 1:1 mixture of two modified viruses carrying different parts of the healthy OTOF gene, with the complete gene reconstructed inside target cells.

Results

All participants showed hearing improvements within one month of treatment, with average hearing thresholds improving from 106 decibels to 52 decibels. The most dramatic improvements occurred in participants aged 5-8 years, with some achieving near-normal hearing. Even older participants, including a 14.5-year-old and 23-year-old, showed meaningful hearing gains. The therapy proved safe with 162 mild-to-moderate adverse events and no serious complications. Effects were rapid, with 62% of total hearing improvement occurring within the first month.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size of only 10 participants, including just one adult, limiting the ability to draw broad conclusions about effectiveness across different populations. Researchers couldn’t fully explain why younger toddlers and older participants showed more modest improvements compared to the 5-8 year age group. The treatment only applies to DFNB9 deafness, a relatively rare genetic condition, and long-term durability beyond 12 months remains to be established.

Funding and Disclosures

The study was funded by multiple Chinese research foundations and Otovia Therapeutics Inc., the company developing the gene therapy. Several authors are employees of Otovia Therapeutics, and the lead researcher serves as the company’s unpaid chief scientist. The commercial sponsor participated in study design and manuscript preparation.

Publication Information

The study was published in Nature Medicine on July 2, 2025. The clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT05901480 and remains ongoing with planned five-year follow-up. The research was conducted in accordance with international ethical guidelines and approved by ethics committees at all participating institutions.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply