Man suffering from heart attack

(© twinsterphoto - stock.adobe.com)

CHICAGO — Men who strongly conform to traditionally masculine behaviors are significantly less likely to receive crucial diagnoses and treatment for serious cardiovascular conditions, according to new research. The study suggests that societal pressure on men to appear tough and self-reliant may be literally putting their hearts at risk.

Researchers from the University of Chicago say this pattern begins as early as adolescence and continues into adulthood, potentially putting these men at greater risk for future cardiovascular problems. Their study, published in JAMA Network Open, followed over 4,000 American men from their teenage years through early adulthood, examining how their degree of “male gender expressivity” (MGE) – essentially, how closely they conform to typical male behavioral patterns – affected their likelihood of being diagnosed with and treated for conditions like high blood pressure and diabetes.

The research team found that men who displayed higher levels of masculine behavior were significantly less likely to receive diagnoses for these conditions, even when medical tests showed they had them. For instance, among men with elevated blood pressure, those with higher MGE scores were 4% less likely to receive a hypertension diagnosis. The effect was even more dramatic for diabetes, where men with higher adolescent MGE scores were 15% less likely to receive a diagnosis when their blood sugar levels indicated they had the condition.

“When we talk about gender expression, we’re not looking at anything physiologic that could be affected by the Y chromosome,” explains Nathaniel Glasser, MD, a general internist and pediatrician at UChicago Medicine and lead author on the paper, in a media release. “We’re purely focused on self-reported behaviors, preferences and beliefs, and how closely these reported behaviors and attitudes resemble those of same-gendered peers.”

A man with heartburn
Men who displayed higher levels of masculine behavior were significantly less likely to receive diagnoses for these conditions, even when medical tests showed they had them. (Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Pexels)

Perhaps most troubling, even when these men did receive diagnoses, they were less likely to follow through with treatment. Among men who had already received a hypertension diagnosis, those who displayed more masculine behaviors in adolescence were 11% less likely to take prescribed blood pressure medications. Similarly, men showing higher masculine traits in young adulthood were 7% less likely to take blood pressure medications and 10% less likely to take diabetes medications when diagnosed with these conditions.

“Our hypothesis is that social pressures are leading to behavioral differences that impact cardiovascular risk mitigation efforts, which is concerning because it could be leading to worse long-term health outcomes,” Glasser adds.

The study participants, who had an average age of 38 by the end of the research period, were predominantly White (64%) and privately insured (80%). The sample included Asian American and Pacific Islander (7%), Hispanic (12%), and non-Hispanic Black (16%) participants, making it broadly representative of the U.S. male population.

The findings suggest that societal pressures on men to appear strong and self-reliant may be inadvertently encouraging them to avoid seeking medical help or acknowledging health problems. This behavior pattern could have serious consequences, as early detection and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors is crucial for preventing heart disease later in life.

“We’re seeing how pressures to convey identity — whether it’s rooted in gender, race, sexuality or something else — impact health behaviors,” Glasser concludes. “Fitting in and achieving belonging is a complicated task, and we feel strongly that increased societal sympathy, empathy and patience for others undertaking that task would be good for people’s health.”

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers used data from a long-term national study that followed participants from adolescence (ages 12-18) through adulthood (ages 32-42). They measured masculine behavior patterns by analyzing how similarly participants answered certain survey questions compared to their male peers. The study then compared these masculinity scores with medical data, including blood pressure readings, blood sugar levels, and cholesterol measurements, as well as self-reported diagnoses and medication use.

Key Results

The study found that 64% of the men had elevated blood pressure, 5% had diabetes-range blood sugar levels, and 10% had high cholesterol. Men with higher masculine behavior scores were less likely to be diagnosed with these conditions, even when present, and less likely to take prescribed medications. Interestingly, the actual prevalence of these conditions wasn’t related to masculine behavior patterns – just the likelihood of getting diagnosed and treated.

Study Limitations

The research relied partly on participants’ self-reporting of diagnoses and medication use, which could be affected by memory issues or reluctance to admit certain behaviors. The study also only followed participants until their early 40s, when many heart-related conditions are just beginning to develop. Additionally, blood pressure measurements were taken during a single visit rather than over multiple occasions, which is typically preferred for accurate diagnosis.

Discussion & Takeaways

The researchers emphasize that these findings highlight a crucial public health concern: societal pressure to appear masculine may be preventing men from receiving necessary medical care. This is particularly important because early detection and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors can significantly impact long-term health outcomes. The study suggests that public health messaging might need to be tailored differently to reach men who strongly conform to traditional masculine behaviors.

Funding & Disclosures

The research was supported by various national health organizations, including the National Institutes of Health and the Health Resources and Services Administration. The data came from a national study funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Several researchers disclosed relationships with healthcare companies and organizations, but these connections were unrelated to the current study.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

10 Comments

  1. Steven Michael says:

    Does this mean that men in San Francisco will live to be an average of 120?

  2. Michael J. Deckerson says:

    Yet another nonsensical, half-baked study designed to warp the minds of young men. Nice.

  3. T terrific says:

    Well then, Tim Walz should live to be 150

  4. Tim W. says:

    Studies find that unmanly men at higher risk of getting pegged.

  5. Buckrbill says:

    So does this hold true for all the 5’2” 120 pound women that apparently can beat up men that are 6 foot four 250 pounds…what this is….

    If I cannot dazzle you with brilliance..then I will baffle you with bs..
    It’s also very funny…

  6. Andrew Roberts says:

    We may die younger but at least we are real men and not soy boys like I see so many of around here.

    1. M says:

      Wow. You learned nothing from the article.
      Thanks for showing “masculine” men do not learn lessons.
      Your kind of “masculinity” is more properly called “malignant narcissism”. Get help before it kills you. And read the article again so you can absorb it this time.

  7. Evan says:

    Another story trying to debase men You want “manly” men, you NEED them. Society and Sovereignty would crumble without them.

  8. Gene T says:

    Lifelong being expected and told to “man up”, “be a man”, “big boys don’t cry” throughout their life by mothers, elementary school teachers, girlfriends, wives, and fellow men is the reason.

    The question “A healthy 25 year old man and a healthy 25 year old woman are standing outside of a burning home and a 1 year old is standing in a second floor window. Who should risk their life to save the child?”

    Now answer the same question with this addition: “The man is a father of 3 children, a 3 year old, 2 year old and a newborn infant and the mother died shortly after childbirth. The woman has no children, is not pregnant and is unmarried. Who should risk their life to save the child in the burning building?”

    The answer to that question tells the relative value placed on the life of the man and relative value placed on the woman. The child in the burning building is small enough for either person to easily carry them and going up one flight of stairs is easy for both persons, therefore it is not a case of difference in physical strength needed to save the child.

    How will this difference in valuing the life of the man or woman to be addressed by society, the news media, and the government?

  9. Sharon says:

    It’s hardly a secret that “manly” men may avoid medical treatment or be lax in compliance due to a need to appear strong. However, an even bigger red flag is indicated here: “The research team found that men who displayed higher levels of masculine behavior were significantly less likely to receive diagnoses for these conditions, even when medical tests showed they had them.”

    So are we just going to gloss over the fact that there are medical professionals failing to diagnose a significant portion of a particular population? Or are we going to address the negligence and/or apparent discrimination against that patient population?