Dad and son watching scary movie

(Credit: Prostock-studio on Shutterstock)

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Movies are getting deadlier – at least in terms of their dialogue. A new study analyzing over 160,000 English-language films has revealed a disturbing trend: characters are talking about murder and killing more frequently than ever before, even in movies that aren’t focused on crime.

Researchers from the University of Maryland, University of Pennsylvania, and The Ohio State University examined movie subtitles spanning five decades, from 1970 to 2020, to track how often characters used words related to murder and killing. What they found was a clear upward trajectory that mirrors previous findings about increasing visual violence in films.

“Characters in noncrime movies are also talking more about killing and murdering today than they did 50 years ago,” says Brad Bushman, corresponding author of the study and professor of communication at The Ohio State University, in a statement. “Not as much as characters in crime movies, and the increase hasn’t been as steep. But it is still happening. We found increases in violence cross all genres.”

By applying sophisticated natural language processing techniques, the team calculated the percentage of “murderous verbs” – variations of words like “kill” and “murder” – compared to the total number of verbs used in movie dialogue. They deliberately took a conservative approach, excluding passive phrases like “he was killed,” negations such as “she didn’t kill,” and questions like “did he murder someone?” to focus solely on characters actively discussing committing violent acts.

“Our findings suggest that references to killing and murder in movie dialogue not only occur far more frequently than in real life but are also increasing over time,” explains Babak Fotouhi, lead author of the study and adjunct assistant research professor in the College of Information at the University of Maryland.

“We focused exclusively on murderous verbs in our analysis to establish a lower bound in our reporting,” notes Amir Tohidi, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Pennsylvania. “Including less extreme forms of violence would result in a higher overall count of violence.”

Nearly 7% of all movies analyzed contained these murderous verbs in their dialogue. The findings demonstrate a steady increase in such language over time, particularly in crime-focused films. Male characters showed the strongest upward trend in violent dialogue, though female characters also demonstrated a significant increase in non-crime movies.

This rising tide of violent speech wasn’t confined to obvious genres like action or thriller films. Even movies not centered on crime showed a measurable uptick in murder-related dialogue over the 50-year period studied. This suggests that casual discussion of lethal violence has become more normalized across all types of movies, potentially contributing to what researchers call “mean world syndrome” – where heavy media consumption leads people to view the world as more dangerous and threatening than it actually is.

The findings align with previous research showing that gun violence in top movies has more than doubled since 1950, and more than tripled in PG-13 films since that rating was introduced in 1985. What makes this new study particularly noteworthy is its massive scale – examining dialogue from more than 166,000 films provides a much more comprehensive picture than earlier studies that looked at smaller samples.

Movie studios operate in an intensely competitive market where they must fight for audience attention. “Movies are trying to compete for the audience’s attention and research shows that violence is one of the elements that most effectively hooks audiences,” Fotouhi explains.

“The evidence suggests that it is highly unlikely we’ve reached a tipping point,” Bushman warns. Decades of research have demonstrated that exposure to media violence can influence aggressive behavior and mental health in both adults and children. This can manifest in various ways, from direct imitation of observed violent acts to a general desensitization toward violence and decreased empathy for others.

As content platforms continue to multiply and screen time increases, particularly among young people, these findings raise important questions about the cumulative impact of exposure to violent dialogue in entertainment media. The researchers emphasize that their results highlight the crucial need for promoting mindful consumption and media literacy, especially among vulnerable populations like children.

Methodology

The researchers intentionally designed their analysis to be conservative in its estimates. “It is likely there was more violence in the movies than what we calculated in terms of the dialogue,” notes Fotouhi. The team excluded passive constructions, negations, and questions to focus solely on active violent dialogue.

Key Results

The study found a significant increase in murderous verbs across all movies over time, with a correlation coefficient of 0.73 and a regression coefficient of 0.30. This trend was particularly strong for male characters in crime movies but was also present for female characters in non-crime films. Of the 166,534 movies analyzed, 6.97% contained murderous verbs in their dialogue.

Study Limitations

The researchers note that they could only analyze dialogue rather than physical actions due to the impracticality of processing full movie scripts or video content for such a large number of films. They also acknowledge that dialogue may not perfectly reflect actual violent behavior shown on screen.

Discussion and Takeaways

The findings suggest that violent dialogue in movies has increased significantly over the past 50 years, even in films not primarily focused on crime. This trend mirrors previous research showing increases in visual violence in films and raises concerns about potential impacts on viewer behavior and mental health, particularly among young audiences.

Funding and Disclosures

The researchers reported no conflicts of interest. No specific funding sources were mentioned in the paper.

Publication Information

This research letter was published online in JAMA Pediatrics on December 30, 2024. The study was conducted between September 2022 and September 2024 by researchers from the University of Maryland, University of Pennsylvania, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, and The Ohio State University.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply