Maitake mushrooms

Maitake mushrooms like these have a unique internal structure that helps them resist pressure in specific directions. (puttography/Shutterstock)

In a nutshell

  • Researchers discovered that the internal thread orientation of mushrooms, specifically hyphal filaments, can alter material strength without changing the material itself.
  • Dimictic mushrooms like maitake showed up to 30 times more stiffness in certain directions compared to randomly structured monomitic mushrooms like white buttons.
  • Computer models confirmed that adjusting thread alignment in bio-inspired materials could nearly double stiffness, offering a new way to design strong, lightweight, and sustainable engineering materials.

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. — Engineers spend billions trying to create materials that are both strong and lightweight. Now, scientists are taking inspiration from mushrooms. They have discovered that these humble fungi could change how we make everything from airplane wings to artificial bones.

Researchers from SUNY Binghamton and UC Merced were particularly interested in how mushrooms organize their microscopic parts. Mushrooms can be simultaneously squishy and remarkably strong. A mushroom can support its own weight while growing through concrete, yet you can easily slice one for dinner. Scientists have wondered how this is possible for years.

The research, published in Advanced Engineering Materials, shows that simply changing the direction of microscopic fungal threads can alter a material’s strength without adding any new components or changing the basic recipe. The internal workings of fungi may also apply to manufacturing.

How Mushroom Architecture Works

Mushrooms are built from tiny thread-like structures called hyphae (pronounced HI-fee), which are long chains of fungal cells. When millions of these microscopic threads work together, they create surprisingly strong structures.

White button mushrooms
White button mushrooms are what many people buy at the store. (Stephen Gibson/Shutterstock)

But not all mushrooms organize these threads the same way. The research team focused on two types of mushroom architecture that represent completely different engineering approaches.

White button mushrooms (the kind you find in most grocery stores) have what scientists call a “monomitic” system. This essentially means they have just one type of building block. These threads are arranged randomly throughout the mushroom.

Maitake mushrooms, on the other hand, have a “dimitic” system with two distinct types of threads. Some are similar to the threads in white mushrooms, but others have thicker, reinforced walls and tend to grow in preferred directions.

Mushroom Strength

To understand how these different arrangements affect strength, the researchers dehydrated both types of mushrooms to eliminate water’s effects. Then they used powerful electron microscopes to examine their internal structure and subjected samples to compression tests, meaning they squished them to see how much force they could withstand.

When compressed in different directions, the randomly arranged white mushrooms showed virtually no difference in strength. They were equally squishy no matter which way you pushed them. Because the threads are pointing in all directions randomly, it makes sense that the overall strength would be roughly the same regardless of how you apply force.

When maitake mushrooms were compressed in the direction that their threads naturally align, they demonstrated higher strength than when compressed perpendicular to that direction.

At the microscopic level, individual threads from maitake mushrooms were stiffer than those from white mushrooms. However, the team suspected that the strength difference was not only about having stronger individual threads but also about whether the arrangement itself might be equally important.

To test this theory, the researchers built 3D computer simulations that modeled mushroom-like structures as networks of tiny beams. They created virtual materials with different thread orientations, testing structures with threads pointing horizontally, vertically, and at various angles in between.

Fungi tessellation
A 3D Voronoi tessellation is the initial step in developing a finite element model, a computational framework that enables mechanical property testing and analysis for further fungi research. (Credit: Mohamed Khalil Elhachimi)

As the thread orientation changed from horizontal to vertical, the material’s stiffness increased by nearly 100%. The researchers could effectively double a material’s strength just by rearranging the same basic components.

When the threads were arranged at a 60-degree angle, they behaved a lot like the random setup seen in white mushrooms. That hints there could be sweet spots for arranging materials to stay strong from all sides. The simulations showed that you can get totally different results from the same ingredients, just by changing how they’re arranged.

What Industries Could Use Mushroom-Inspired Materials?

Right now, making materials with different strengths usually means using different raw materials or complicated chemistry. But this study shows you might get the same results just by changing how things are put together.

Engineers are excited about what this means for aerospace, where materials need to be strong against specific forces while remaining lightweight. Medical device manufacturers are also looking into ways to build bone supports that can be tailored to match the strength and feel of real bone.

Companies experimenting with mushroom-based alternatives to leather and plastic packaging could potentially fine-tune their bio-based materials’ properties by controlling fungal growth patterns to create custom materials.

Engineers could save enormous amounts of time and money in development by using this research to predict material properties before physical testing. It could be particularly valuable for creating hybrid structures with multiple layers oriented in different directions.

“There is so much we can still learn from nature,” says corresponding author Mir Jalil Razavi from Binghamton University, in a statement. “We are just getting started with this kind of research.”

The humble mushroom could serve as a blueprint for future sustainable materials. Modeling materials after fungi would be a green solution that is also strong enough to actually be useful in engineering.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers studied two types of mushrooms: white button mushrooms (with randomly oriented internal threads) and maitake mushrooms (with preferentially oriented threads). They removed water from samples, then used powerful microscopes to analyze internal structures. Testing included squeezing mushroom samples to measure strength and using extremely small probes to test individual thread properties. The team created 3D computer models simulating mushroom-like networks with different thread orientations.

Results

Maitake mushrooms showed threads oriented in preferred directions, while white mushrooms had random orientations. Strength testing revealed that maitake samples were much stronger when compressed along their preferred thread direction compared to perpendicular compression, while white mushroom samples showed no directional differences. Individual thread testing showed maitake threads were significantly stiffer. Computer simulations demonstrated that changing thread orientation from horizontal to vertical nearly doubled structural stiffness.

Limitations

The study used dried mushroom samples, which may not fully represent fresh mushroom behavior. Natural specimens show high variability between individuals. The computer models represent simplified versions of natural structures and focused on compression testing, which may not capture behavior under other types of forces.

Funding and Disclosures

Research was supported by startup funding from the University of California, Merced, and the Integrated Electronics Engineering Center at Binghamton University. Authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Publication Information

The paper “Computational Modeling and Analysis of Fungi-Inspired Network Systems” is authored by Mohamed Khalil Elhachimi, Akbar Solhtalab, Mir Jalil Razavi, and Debora Lyn Porter. It was published in Advanced Engineering Materials in 2025.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply