Sandra Bullock

Sandra Bullock (Credit: Openverse)

LONDON — How much is your time worth in dollars and cents? Obviously Hollywood actors make a lot more money than the average person, but a new survey finds some stars actually make more in a single second than many people do in an entire year!

While she’s definitely a member of the A-list, it may surprise you to find out that Academy Award winner Sandra Bullock tops the list of actors in Oscar-worthy movies in terms of her worth per second to these films! According to a study, commissioned by, Bullock is worth nearly $95,000 for every second she’s on the screen in recent Oscar-nominated films.

Among her many credits, Bullock took home the Academy Award for Best Actress in a Leading Role in 2010 for her work in “The Blind Side.” Sir Ian McKellen comes in second, with a box office worth of just over $90,000 for each second the English movie legend graces the screen.

After these two A-list stars, the drop-off is pretty significant, with Kate Winslet (3rd), Whoopi Goldberg (4th), and Dustin Hoffman (5th) rounding out the top five. However, the study estimates their worth at around $75,000 per second when they appear on screen in a nominated film.

At the opposite end of the scale, screen greats Robert De Niro and Tom Cruise rank 48th and 49th respectively, compiling just over $26,000 of box office worth per second, according to the study’s metrics. Perhaps they need to talk their agents!

When it comes to lots of pay for just a little bit of work, it might stun you to learn that Oscar-winning actor Anthony Hopkins appeared on screen during “The Silence of the Lambs” for just 16 minutes! Despite this, Hopkins was reportedly offered $15 million for the sequel. Talk about working smart!

Top 50 most valuable Oscar-worthy actors

[ninja_tables id=”86780″]

Click here for full list of Most Valuable Actors

Survey methodology: was curious to discover which Oscar-nominated/winning actors over the last 40 years are the most valuable by analyzing the worth per second on screen. Please note that only current living actors with greater than one nominated film were included in the final data.

Firstly, utilized and to gather each actor’s estimated net worth. Secondly, they used to calculate the actor’s time spent on screen for all Oscar-nominated films. allowed researchers to obtain international box office data. The team only used films from 1980 to the present due to a lack of data for older films. In addition, researchers excluded some films from 2020 and 2021 because of insufficient box office data. All figures were adjusted for inflation using the US CPI data.

For each actor, researchers calculated the sum of worldwide box office earnings of the Oscar-nominated films they were in, plus the time in seconds they were on screen. In addition, they calculated the average proportion of time spent on screen.

The team then multiplied the box office sum by the average time on screen to get a proportion of box office earnings. Please note the final sum was converted using Google finance formula for other currencies. This value was then divided by the number of seconds the actor spent on the screen to get an average worth per second for each actor, revealing the most valuable actors.

About Chris Melore

Chris Melore has been a writer, researcher, editor, and producer in the New York-area since 2006. He won a local Emmy award for his work in sports television in 2011.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink


Chris Melore


Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor


  1. Carl says:

    What’s the criteria for this list. If true why does Cruise have twice the bank account than her.

  2. rametindallas says:

    How much, per second, was Marlon Brando paid for ‘Superman’?

  3. Bob Smith says:

    And that’s just to cover the plastic surgery costs per year! 🙂 (but seriously, I just watched “Bullet Train”, and saw her in another movie not long ago and she looks like a mannequin)

  4. matt says:

    table cell padding?

  5. alpha1six says:

    I’m glad for her. She seems to be a nice person.

  6. Kaiser says:

    This is a bizarre analysis. For Sandra Bullock, you’ve asserted that because she’s on the screen for 62% of the film, that she is solely responsible for 62% of the box office revenue. Even if that were true, the box office revenue isn’t hers. She may have a share of it, however her earnings would better be described by how much she was compensated divided by how many seconds she worked on the film.

  7. James Rogers says:

    Whoopi Goldberg?