Credit: Antiquity (2025) DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2025.10220
Modern phones break down in a few years. These ancient communication devices still work, no software updates needed!
In A Nutshell
- Ancient communication technology thrived for 1,500 years, then mysteriously vanished for three millennia before reappearing in the Iron Age
- Archaeologists tested 12 Neolithic shell trumpets from Catalonia dating 4690-3650 BC; incredibly, eight still work after 6,000 years
- The loudest reaches 111.5 decibels (car horn level), suggesting these were used for long-distance acoustic signaling
- Shells cluster within 5-10 kilometers across five sites, hinting at a shared signaling practice among communities
Before smartphones, before writing, even before smoke signals, Neolithic communities in what is now Catalonia, Spain had figured out long-distance communication. Their solution was elegantly simple: modify large seashells to blast sound across farmland, mountains, and mine shafts.
Archaeologists just tested 12 of these shell trumpets dating back 6,000 years. Eight could still be played, though one was much quieter than the rest. The discovery hints at a shared signaling practice, sort of like “walkie-talkies,” that operated for 1,500 years before mysteriously vanishing.
Published in Antiquity, researchers Miquel López-Garcia and Margarita Díaz-Andreu from the University of Barcelona analyzed shells from five sites clustered in a small region. All date between 4690 and 3650 BC. The loudest reaches 111.5 decibels, roughly equivalent to a rock concert. That’s more than adequate for long-distance signaling.
Where Did These Trumpet Shells Come From?
The shells didn’t turn up randomly scattered across Spain. They came from settlements within 5-10 kilometers of each other in the Penedès region and along the Llobregat River. Two farming communities, Mas d’en Boixos and Cal Pere Pastor, sat just five kilometers apart. Both had shell trumpets during the same time period.
Five kilometers sits right at the edge of how far someone can see across flat ground. But sound could travel much farther. A blast this loud from one settlement could plausibly alert workers at the other about arrivals, coordinate harvest timing, or warn of threats. During planting and harvest, when people spread across surrounding fields, acoustic signals beat sending runners back and forth.
One shell came from Cova de l’Or, a cave high in the Collserola mountains. Mountains block visual contact quickly, but sound waves could bounce around valleys and peaks, reaching spots invisible to the eye. Another came from Espalter in the Barcelona plain, another dense farming area.
Six shells turned up in abandoned mine galleries at Can Tintorer at Gavà, near the Mediterranean coast. Neolithic workers extracted variscite there, a green mineral used in jewelry and ornaments. Coordinating teams in dark underground tunnels separated by rock walls presents obvious challenges. Shell trumpets could have been a practical way to coordinate people in dark galleries where visual signals fail. Finding several in mine areas suggests it wasn’t a one-off experiment.
Engineering the Perfect Signal
Not every seashell works for long-distance signaling. Neolithic communities specifically selected Charonia lampas, a Mediterranean gastropod, in medium sizes between 140-191 millimeters. Worm holes and sponge damage on the shells suggest they were collected dead from the seafloor, not harvested for food. People sought them specifically for their acoustic properties.
The modification was straightforward but required precision. Workers removed the pointed tip to create a mouthpiece. Cut quality mattered enormously. Clean, regular cuts about 20 millimeters wide enabled stable, loud notes. Jagged or oversized cuts ruined playability. One Mas d’en Boixos specimen with a rough 36-millimeter opening barely works (the same shell that reached only 91 decibels despite being otherwise intact).
Two shells have holes in their sides, previously thought to be either natural or deliberate cord attachments. Tests showed that side holes can noticeably weaken the blast, which makes them unlikely to be helpful if the goal was long-distance signaling. For carrying sound as far as possible, every bit of volume matters.
Testing 6,000-Year-Old Communication Technology
López-Garcia is both an archaeologist and a professional trumpet player, making him uniquely qualified to test prehistoric wind instruments. He played each working shell in controlled lab conditions while researchers measured sound levels from one meter away.
Seven shells consistently exceeded 100 decibels, with peaks between 104.7 and 111.5. For context, normal conversation measures around 60 decibels, a lawnmower about 90. The strongest shells produce sound equivalent to standing next to a car horn.
The shells also showed consistency. Seven produced notes between 395-471 Hz (roughly G4 to A4 on a piano). One outlier hit 595 Hz. Their notes cluster in a similar range across 1,500 years and multiple sites, which might have helped make signals easier to recognize.
Pitch stability was extraordinary in most cases. The best performers held a very steady note, though one was less consistent. One shell from Cova de l’Or maintained remarkable stability at just 1.73 hertz variation around its 395 hertz fundamental. That means the note stayed nearly identical across repeated playing. That consistency would let communities develop recognizable patterns where different blast lengths, rhythms, or pitches encoded different meanings.
More Than Warning Blasts
While long-distance signaling was likely the primary use, these instruments could do more. The best-preserved shells produce three distinct, stable notes. That allows for melodic sequences, not just on-off alarms. Players can bend pitch by adjusting lip tension, create volume variation by changing air pressure, and articulate notes cleanly.
Whether communities developed formal signal codes remains unknown, but the acoustic versatility was there. Modern research shows even limited tone sets can transmit substantial information through temporal patterning. Rhythm, volume, pitch variation, and note sequences could all encode distinct messages beyond “danger approaching.”
The shell found in a burial pit at Mas d’en Boixos alongside five adult males hints these instruments carried social significance beyond pure utility. Musical or ceremonial use would make sense alongside practical signaling.
The Mystery of the Disappearing Trumpets
For 1,500 years, Neolithic communities across Catalonia maintained knowledge of which shells worked best, how to cut them properly, and presumably what different signals meant. The archaeological record shows consistency in shell selection and modification across this span.
Then around 3650 BC, shell trumpets vanish from Catalonia’s archaeological record. The technology doesn’t resurface for three thousand years until the Iron Age. What happened?
Several possibilities exist. Maybe communities developed better communication methods. Perhaps Charonia lampas populations crashed, making shells hard to obtain. Or disposal practices changed in ways that leave no archaeological trace. The mystery deepens because other Mediterranean regions (Italy, France, the eastern Mediterranean) continued using shell trumpets into later periods. Something specific to Catalonia drove the change.
The 1,500-year run shows these instruments solved real problems. Coordinating agricultural labor, maintaining contact between settlements, alerting about threats, managing dangerous underground mining. All of these scenarios would have benefited from acoustic signaling that worked day or night, rain or shine, across visual obstacles.
When López-Garcia plays these instruments today, producing blasts that still echo powerfully, he’s not just making archaeological noise. He’s testing a signaling technology that may have connected Neolithic farmers, miners, and communities across a landscape where survival often depended on staying in touch.
Paper Notes
Limitations
Not all shell trumpets could be tested for sound production. Four of the 12 specimens have fractures preventing their use. Some shells show post-depositional damage, including irregular apical cuts, surface erosion, and interior concretions, complicating assessment of their original acoustic properties. The research assumes biological markers indicate post-mortem collection, but this inference cannot be definitively proven. Acoustic measurements were conducted in controlled laboratory conditions that differ from outdoor environments where these instruments would have been used. Terrain, vegetation, wind, and humidity all affect sound propagation over distance, but field testing was not possible. The study relies on one player’s interpretation of optimal playing technique, though the player’s professional training in brass instruments provides relevant expertise. Whether Neolithic users employed identical techniques remains speculative. Attribution of some shells to specific cultural phases, particularly the specimen from Cova de l’Or, relies on ceramic typology rather than direct radiocarbon dating due to unclear stratigraphy. The concentration of finds in Catalonia may reflect research focus and archaeological activity in this region rather than exclusive use of shell trumpets there.
Funding and Disclosures
This research was supported by the Artsoundscapes project, funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement number 787842, with ICREA Research Professor Margarita Díaz-Andreu serving as Principal Investigator. The project ran from 2018 to 2025. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publication Details
Title: Signalling and music-making: interpreting the Neolithic shell trumpets of Catalonia (Spain) | Authors: Miquel López-Garcia and Margarita Díaz-Andreu, both affiliated with the Departament d’Història i Arqueologia and Institut d’Arqueologia de la Universitat de Barcelona. Díaz-Andreu also holds appointment with the Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) in Barcelona. | Journal: Antiquity, Volume 99, Issue 408, pages 1480-1497 | Publication Date: 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2025.10220 | Article Type: Open Access research article published under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license | Received: April 1, 2025; Revised: June 23, 2025; Accepted: July 3, 2025 | Data Availability: Original research data available through CORA, Repositori de Dades de Recerca, Universitat de Barcelona at https://doi.org/10.34810/data2242 | Supplementary Materials: Additional content including audio recordings accessible via the journal’s supplementary materials portal








These shells’ potential as communication devices has never reached its potential, considering that if one puts it to one’s ear one can hear the ocean.