Teen student using smartphone in school

Smartphone use by students doesn't seem to be stopping during school hours, research shows. (Photo by wavebreakmedia on Shutterstock)

In A Nutshell

  • Nearly all US public schools report having phone rules, yet teens still averaged about 70 minutes of smartphone use during school hours.
  • Social media was the biggest slice (around 30 minutes), with video and games adding roughly another 30 minutes combined.
  • Teens who scored highest on “problematic use” measures spent several extra minutes on phones during school, depending on the measure used.
  • The study tracked Android phones only and did not test which school phone policies or enforcement strategies work best.

Nearly 100% of public schools in America have rules about smartphones. But new research shows that even with near-universal policies in place, teens still spend more than an hour each school day on their devices. And for some students, the problem goes deeper than distraction.

New data tracking actual phone use (not self-reports) shows 13- to 18-year-olds average 1 hour and 10 minutes on smartphones during school hours. Most of that time goes to scrolling social media, watching videos, and playing games. The study, published in JAMA, shows that teens with the most problematic phone habits spent an additional 10 minutes glued to screens compared to their peers.

The Challenge of Phone Policies During School Hours

The research tracked 640 teens’ Android phones between September 2022 and May 2024 using monitoring technology that captured actual usage during school hours. While 99.7% of principals report having policies in place, the study shows substantial phone use continues: students averaged more than an hour daily on devices.

The study didn’t evaluate specific policies or test which approaches reduce use. But the findings suggest that alongside widespread rules, teens are still finding ways to stay connected. The specific approaches schools take vary widely, and this research didn’t track which policies were in place at different schools or how enforcement worked.

For students with higher problematic use scores, the data suggests the pull of devices may be strong enough to override rules, even when consequences are possible. Whether stricter policies would help, or whether a different approach is needed, remains an open question.

Students using their smartphones during class
Phone policies still are keeping students from using their devices during school hours. (Photo by BearFotos on Shutterstock)

When Students Score High on Problematic Use Measures

Researchers used two standardized questionnaires: the Social Media Addiction Questionnaire (SMAQ) and Mobile Phone Involvement Questionnaire (MPIQ), where higher scores indicate more problematic social media or phone use.

Students who scored in the highest third on these measures spent about 10 extra minutes per school day on social media apps compared to classmates. They logged nearly 10 more minutes of overall phone time and about 7 additional minutes on social media apps overall.

For these teens, smartphones appear more difficult to set aside, even during school hours when use is typically forbidden. The data shows a clear pattern: higher scores on problematic use measures correlate with more phone time during the school day.

Social Media Takes the Biggest Chunk of School Phone Time

When teens pulled out phones during the school day, social media dominated. Apps like Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat (which fall into the social media category) consumed around 30 minutes on average, the single largest category of use. YouTube came in second at about 15 minutes, with games like Roblox, Clash Royale, and Pokemon GO taking up another 15 minutes.

The breakdown makes clear students aren’t sneaking quick glances for homework help. They’re consuming entertainment and maintaining social connections, treating school hours as just another part of their always-on digital lives. Communication apps (including web browsers) accounted for 9 minutes, while music, photography, and actual educational apps made up smaller portions.

The research couldn’t separate educational from recreational use, so some portion might have been legitimate classroom activity. But when social media, video, and gaming account for most of the time, the bulk clearly falls outside what teachers would approve.

Who’s Using Phones Most During School Hours

Not all students are using phones equally. Older teens (ages 16-18) spent nearly 20 more minutes per day on devices than younger students (13-15). Black students used phones about 22 minutes more than white students. And teens from families earning under $25,000 annually logged significantly more screen time than those from higher-income households, differences of roughly 12 to 20 minutes depending on income level.

The study didn’t dig into why these gaps exist, but they raise uncomfortable questions. Are phone policies being enforced differently for different students? Do some teens have fewer alternative sources of stimulation during downtime? The data can’t answer these questions, but the patterns are hard to ignore.

What This Means for Parents and Schools

The researchers note that because school smartphone regulations are changing rapidly, periodic follow-up studies will be needed to understand whether stricter policies actually reduce screen time and whether reduced screen time translates into better academic performance and mental health outcomes.

One limitation is that the research only captured data from Android users. The findings might not apply equally to teens using iPhones, who represent a substantial portion of the adolescent smartphone market. The study also relied on short collection windows rather than continuous year-long tracking, potentially missing seasonal variations.

Still, the data offers a reality check. Parents, teachers, and policymakers may assume existing phone policies are keeping devices out of students’ hands during class. But when teens average more than an hour per day on screens during school (and those with higher problematic use scores log even more time) the current approach isn’t eliminating the issue. Understanding which policies actually work, how to enforce them effectively, and whether some students need different support will require further research.

Paper Notes

Limitations

Data was collected from Android users only and may not apply to iPhone users. The research tracked usage during select weeks between September 2022 and May 2024 rather than continuously throughout entire school years. Researchers could not distinguish between educational and recreational phone use. The study did not track which specific phone policies were in place at different schools, how those policies changed during the collection period, or how they were enforced. Sample size was 640 adolescents who provided at least two weekdays of data during school hours.

Funding and Disclosures

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers K08HL159350, R01MH135492, R01DA064134). Dr. Jason M. Nagata reported receiving grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr. Lauren Hale disclosed receiving personal fees from the National Sleep Foundation for chairing the Screens and Sleep Consensus Panel and from the Children and Screens Institute for co-editing a handbook. She also reported receiving grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the Della Pietra Family Foundation, and serving as an expert witness for social media litigation. Dr. Fiona C. Baker reported receiving grants from the NIH during the study. Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis reported serving as an expert consultant in social media litigation for Motley Rice. No other conflicts of interest were disclosed by the authors. The ABCD Study was supported by the NIH and additional federal partners under multiple award numbers. The NIH had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit for publication.

Publication Details

Title: “Smartphone Use During School Hours by US Youth in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study”

Authors: Jason M. Nagata, MD, MSc (Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco); Kristen E. Kim, MPH (same affiliation); Oliver H. Huang (same affiliation); Derek Sportsman, EdM (same affiliation); Lauren Hale, PhD (Program in Public Health, Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University); Fiona C. Baker, PhD (Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, California); Dimitri A. Christakis, MD (Seattle Children’s Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle)

Journal: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) | Publication Date: Published online January 5, 2026 | DOI: 10.1001/jama.2025.23235 | Data Source: Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, utilizing the Effortless Assessment Research System (EARS) app for passive smartphone monitoring

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply