parent child computer

Photo of dad holding hand on eyes of child (© deagreez - stock.adobe.com)

NEW YORK — Does every single private and painful moment in a person’s life need to be put on television? It seems many Americans have finally had enough. Three in five Americans believe reality TV has gone too far, according to new research. 

A new survey of 2,000 respondents examined people’s current perceptions of reality TV. The results showed that many feel unscripted programs take too many liberties when it comes to making money off of participants’ traumatic moments. Respondents were also asked whether they felt reality TV had taken participants’ personal pain too far in entertainment — and a little more than half (57%) believe it has.

The survey, conducted by Talker Research, comes after the controversial Bachelorette season 21 finale in which star Jenn Tran was forced to re-watch her engagement breakup on live TV. The episode saw fan backlash on social media, with online conversations questioning the ethics surrounding the network’s decision to air the incident. 

The survey results show that over half of Americans (56%) surveyed believe reality TV producers should be held accountable for the mental health of their show’s participants. Nearly half of millennials surveyed (46%) said they are reconsidering watching the Bachelor/Bachelorette franchise, with 45% saying the Jenn Tran incident made them reflect on the reality TV they consume.

“Viewers are sympathetic to reality show participants,” says Dr. Carole Lieberman, a psychiatrist-consultant for reality TV, in a statement. “But would they watch such shows if they were all warm and fuzzy as compared to the ones that put participants in the most humiliating situations?”

Young woman covering eyes of girlfriend
Half of Americans (56%) surveyed believe reality TV producers should be held accountable for the mental health of participants. (Katcha_Natsarin/Shutterstock)

Lieberman adds that in addition to viewers changing their minds on what they consider entertainment, other improvements should be made.

“A good start would be to provide crisis aftercare for the participants in their hometown, instead of quickly shoving them off the set and into cars taking them to the airport,” Lieberman says.

“Reality show contestant contracts basically say that the production company isn’t responsible for anything that goes wrong, anything the participant didn’t expect, or any damages to their reputation or to their life. But, it says this in veiled language while holding out the promise of fame and fortune as a carrot,” Dr. Lieberman explains when asked what additional policy changes she would like to see to protect reality TV participants.

“Reality shows should do more to evaluate the prospective participant’s mental health. Some shows have a psychiatrist-consultant, but the majority do not.”

Survey methodology

Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; administered and conducted online by Talker Research between September 6 and September 11, 2024.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply