Indoor air pollution in car

Scientists say microplastics fill the air of cars, making them a prominent place for daily indoor air pollution. (© Lamina – stock.adobe.com)

In A Nutshell

  • Breathing plastic: Adults inhale roughly 68,000 particles indoors, or about 3 to 4 per breath.
  • Tiny but mighty: Study detected fragments as small as 1 µm using Raman spectroscopy.
  • Car vs. home: Car cabins had over four times more particles (2,238 MPs/m³) than apartments (528 MPs/m³).
  • Health concerns: These small bits can lodge deep in lungs, enter the bloodstream, and carry toxins.

TOULOUSE, France — Every day, adults inhale an estimated 68,000 microplastic particles just from indoor air, which is equivalent to about three to four particles per breath, research shows. Scientists say this daily total is roughly 100 times higher than earlier estimates based on larger particles.

French researchers made this startling discovery by using advanced detection methods to spot plastic fragments invisible to earlier studies. Unlike previous work that could only identify particles larger than 10 micrometers, this investigation focused on the tiniest fragments measuring just 1–10 micrometers, or about 10 times thinner than a human hair.

“The health impacts of MP inhalation may be more substantial than we realize,” the research team wrote in their paper, published in PLOS One.

That’s because particles this small can penetrate the deepest parts of the lungs, cross into the bloodstream, and potentially reach vital organs. In car cabins, concentrations were especially of concern, measuring more than four times what the researchers measured in apartments.

Indoor air pollution: A ray of light coming through a window shows fine particles floating about.
Indoor air pollution: A ray of light coming through a window shows fine particles floating about. (Photo by struvictory on Shutterstock)

How Scientists Detected These Invisible Particles

Microplastics form when larger plastic items such as bottles, bags, and textiles break down. While contamination in oceans and rivers is well known, detecting these fragments in indoor air has been a challenge. The term “microplastic” refers to plastic particles between 1 micrometer and 5mm in size. While scientists have known for years that these particles contaminate oceans and rivers, understanding their presence in indoor air has proven more challenging.

The research team from France’s Géosciences Environnement Toulouse used a technique called Raman spectroscopy to identify and count these nearly invisible particles. This method can detect plastic fragments as small as 1 micrometer, a major advancement over the standard approach that only catches particles 10 to 20 times larger.

Researchers collected air samples from three apartments in Toulouse, France, and two different cars during various driving trips. The process proved incredibly time-consuming. Analyzing just one square millimeter of filter required 14 hours of spectra collection and produced about 3,600 individual particle readings. This intensive approach meant the team could only examine 16 samples total, but the results provided unprecedented detail about the smallest plastic particles in indoor air.

Analysis revealed 10 different types of plastic polymers floating in indoor air In homes, polyethylene (the plastic used in shopping bags and food containers) dominated, making up 76% of all particles found. Nearly all detected particles (97%) appeared as irregular fragments rather than fibers, and an overwhelming 94% measured between 1 and 10 micrometers.

Why Microplastic Particles Are More Dangerous

Particles greater than 10 micrometers usually get trapped in the upper respiratory tract and are cleared by coughing or swallowing. But the 1–10 micrometer fragments can bypass these defenses and lodge deep in lung tissue.

The health concerns extend beyond the physical presence of plastic particles. These fragments often carry toxic chemical additives and can absorb harmful pollutants from the environment. When lodged in body tissues, they may release these chemicals, potentially disrupting hormone functions and increasing cancer risks.

Occupational studies have already documented serious health problems among workers exposed to high levels of airborne plastic particles. Textile industry employees, for example, show three times the normal rate of lung cancer, particularly those working with synthetic fibers like nylon.

Even larger particles that get trapped in the respiratory system contribute to plastic exposure through an indirect pathway. These particles get cleared by the body’s natural cleaning mechanisms and are then swallowed, leading to gastrointestinal exposure. The researchers estimate this indirect route may exceed current estimates of dietary microplastic intake from food and beverages.

Indoor microplastic concentrations.
Indoor microplastic concentrations. (Credit: Nadiia Yakovenko, CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/))

Vehicle Interiors Create Microplastic Hotspots

Vehicle interiors emerged as particularly intense sources of plastic particle exposure, with air samples containing 2,238 particles per cubic meter versus 528 particles per cubic meter in homes. The confined spaces contain numerous synthetic materials that constantly shed microscopic fragments through wear, temperature changes, and UV exposure from sunlight.

Polyamide and polyethylene (common materials in car upholstery and interior components) dominated the plastic particles found in vehicle air samples. Cars showed a different contamination pattern than homes, with polyamide (25%) and other interior materials like dashboard plastics leading the contamination instead of the polyethylene that dominated household air.

The constant vibration, temperature fluctuations, and physical wear of driving appears to accelerate the breakdown of these materials into respirable particles. Since people in developed countries spend approximately 5% of their time in vehicles according to the study, this concentrated exposure represents a significant source of daily microplastic inhalation.

What Research Shows About Global Exposure

Comparing results with other published studies on indoor air quality showed remarkable consistency. Despite different methods and locations, research from around the world showed similar patterns of microplastic distribution, pointing to a global phenomenon rather than isolated incidents.

Scientists still need direct measurements of the smallest particles (nanoplastics below 1 micrometer) to complete the exposure picture. The study’s mathematical models indicate these ultra-tiny fragments could number in the millions per cubic meter of air, representing potentially massive daily exposures.

Future research should examine how factors like ventilation, cleaning practices, building materials, and human activities influence indoor microplastic concentrations. Understanding these variables could help develop strategies to reduce exposure levels.

Given that people spend about 90% of their time indoors, the study underscores an urgent question: How much plastic can our bodies safely tolerate?

Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a scientific research paper. Interpretations reflect the study’s data; further research may refine these insights. This content is for informational purposes and not medical advice.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers collected air samples from three apartments and two cars in France using vacuum pumps and ultra-fine filters. They used Raman spectroscopy to identify plastic particles as small as 1 micrometer, analyzing tiny filter sections under high-magnification microscopes. The process was extremely time-intensive, requiring 14 hours to analyze each 1-square-millimeter section and generating thousands of individual particle readings per sample. Only 16 samples total were analyzed due to the labor-intensive nature of the detection method.

Results

Indoor air contained a median concentration of 1,877 microplastic particles per cubic meter, with car cabins showing higher levels (2,238 particles/m³) than apartments (528 particles/m³). About 94% of particles measured between 1-10 micrometers, and 97% appeared as fragments rather than fibers. Polyethylene dominated in homes (76%), while car interiors showed more diverse plastic types including polyamide (25%). Based on standard breathing rates, adults inhale an estimated 68,000 microplastic particles daily, while children inhale about 47,000 daily.

Limitations

The study examined only 16 samples from a limited geographic area and two specific indoor environments. The intensive analysis method meant researchers could examine just 0.3% of each filter’s surface area. Sample sizes were small, and the results may not represent the full range of human indoor exposure scenarios. The study also could not directly measure nanoplastics smaller than 1 micrometer.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was funded by ANR-20-CE34-0014 ATMO-PLASTIC and ANR-23-CE34-0012 BUBBLPLAST grants. The authors declared no competing interests and noted that no permits were required since all studied environments were privately owned by the research team members.

Publication Information

Yakovenko N, Pérez-Serrano L, Segur T, Hagelskjaer O, Margenat H, Le Roux G, et al. (2025) “Human exposure to PM10 microplastics in indoor air.” PLoS One 20(7): e0328011. Published July 30, 2025. The study is available as open access under Creative Commons Attribution License.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply