For many, Instagram is as powerfully addicting as drugs. (© Laurentiu Iordache - stock.adobe.com)
Actual Instagram addiction is much rarer than the news media narrative suggests.
In A Nutshell
- Only 2% of Instagram users show clinical addiction symptoms, but 18% believe they’re addicted—a gap that matters because the label itself reduces people’s sense of control over their behavior
- When researchers reminded daily Instagram users about addiction warnings, those users immediately reported less control, more self-blame, and more failed quit attempts compared to users who weren’t exposed to addiction framing
- Most excessive Instagram use is habit, not addiction—habits form through repeated actions in response to environmental cues and require different solutions than treating clinical addiction
- News coverage uses “social media addiction” 87 times more often than “social media habits,” creating a narrative that may be harming millions of users who absorb and internalize the addiction label
Sometimes placing a label on a behavior only makes the matter worse. Social media addiction is a very real phenomenon, but noteworthy research now reports simply believing you’re addicted to Instagram actually makes it harder to control your use. These findings show how the label itself becomes a problem, turning a manageable habit into something that feels impossible to quit.
Scientists from CalTech and USC studied over 1,200 Instagram users and discovered something troubling. When daily users were reminded of the U.S. Surgeon General’s warning that social media is addictive, they reported less control over their behavior, blamed themselves more for overuse, and felt more trapped by their scrolling patterns. The simple act of thinking about Instagram as an addiction reduced their ability to manage it.
The problem runs deeper than most people realize. Only 2% of active Instagram users showed clinical symptoms that would place them at risk for actual addiction, yet 18% believed they were addicted. That gap matters because perceiving yourself as addicted comes with consequences that have nothing to do with whether you’re actually experiencing withdrawal, cravings, or other hallmark addiction symptoms.
How the Instagram Addiction Label Backfires
Study author Ian Anderson and his colleague Wendy Wood ran an experiment where they randomly assigned 824 Instagram users to different groups. Some participants were asked to reflect on times they felt addicted to the app after reading language from the Surgeon General’s advisory. Others completed the same measures without that addiction framing.
The results, published in Scientific Reports, were immediate. People who reflected on their “addiction” reported less control over their Instagram use compared to those who didn’t engage with that label. They also recalled more past failed attempts to cut back and blamed themselves more when they used the app too much.
Participants in the study were daily Instagram users from across the U.S., but did not include people in treatment or dealing with clinical disorders. The two-minute exposure to addiction framing was enough to measurably reduce their sense of control.
The researchers found that self-reported addiction was tied to lower perceived control over Instagram use, more past attempts to quit, and greater self-blame for excessive scrolling. Notably, people who simply recognized their Instagram use as habitual, rather than addictive, didn’t experience these same negative outcomes.
What’s Really Happening With Your Instagram Use
Most excessive Instagram use isn’t addiction at all. It’s habit. Habits form when people repeat rewarded actions in stable contexts. On Instagram, checking the app when bored automatically triggers scrolling, liking, and commenting before people consciously decide to do those things.
Habits and addictions might look similar on the surface. Both can lead to unwanted consequences and feel automatic. But they’re different in ways that matter. Clinical addiction involves physical or psychological symptoms like withdrawal, escalating doses, life disruption, and cravings that persist even when the substance or behavior stops providing pleasure.
When the researchers measured actual addiction symptoms using a standard clinical scale, they found that only a tiny fraction of Instagram users met the criteria. The most commonly reported symptom was “salience,” with 20% of users saying they often or very often spent time thinking about Instagram. But the symptoms that really matter for addiction, like withdrawal and major life conflict, were rare. Only 4% experienced withdrawal when prohibited from using Instagram, and just 6% said it negatively impacted their job or studies.
Compare that to the number of users who felt they were habitual Instagram users. About half recognized their use as automatic and routine. That’s a more accurate picture of what’s happening.
Why the Media Keeps Saying Addiction
Researchers went looking for an explanation of why so many people think they’re addicted when clinical measures suggest otherwise. They found it in the news.
Using Buzzsumo, a media tracking tool, Anderson and Wood analyzed three years of U.S. news coverage. They discovered that articles mentioning “social media addiction” outnumbered those discussing “social media habits” by an eye-opening 87 to 1. The addiction articles also generated far more engagement on social media platforms, reaching wider audiences through shares, likes, and comments.
Major news events drove spikes in addiction coverage. When lawsuits were filed against Meta in May 2022 and October 2024, articles about social media addiction surged. The Surgeon General’s May 2023 advisory warning about social media and youth mental health created another sustained wave of addiction-focused coverage.
This constant drumbeat of addiction messaging creates a narrative that users absorb and apply to their own behavior, even when their experiences don’t match the clinical picture.
Breaking Habits Requires Different Strategies Than Treating Addiction
Mislabeling habitual Instagram use as addiction doesn’t just harm users psychologically. It also points them toward the wrong solutions.
Treating addiction typically focuses on managing cravings, addressing withdrawal symptoms, and dealing with the physiological and psychological dependence that develops with substance abuse disorders. People experiencing genuine addiction may need clinical intervention, support groups, or medical supervision to quit safely.
Changing habits requires completely different approaches. Habits persist because environmental cues automatically trigger responses. The key to changing them is disrupting those cue-response patterns.
For Instagram habits, that might mean turning off notifications so the phone doesn’t constantly remind you to check. It could involve placing your phone in a drawer rather than on your desk where you’ll see it. Some people find success switching their phone to grayscale mode, removing the visual appeal that makes scrolling more rewarding.
Another approach is habit replacement. Instead of trying to use willpower to resist checking Instagram when bored, practice doing something else when that bored feeling hits. Read a book, use a language learning app, or call a friend. Over time, these alternative responses can form new automatic patterns.
The researchers noted that these habit-change strategies work specifically because Instagram use is habitual, not addictive. Willpower-based attempts to quit cold turkey often fail with habits because the automatic cues in daily life keep triggering the urge to scroll.
The Real Numbers
The researchers found that roughly 2% of Instagram users scored as “at risk” for addiction on a standard clinical scale. With about 121 million Americans using Instagram, that works out to approximately 2.4 million people who might actually have addiction-level problems. But 18% of users in the study believed they were addicted. If those same rates hold across the broader population, that suggests tens of millions of people who feel trapped by Instagram use, even though only a small fraction show addiction symptoms.
That gap matters. People are experiencing reduced control, increased self-blame, and lower confidence in their ability to change their behavior based on a misunderstanding about what’s actually driving their Instagram use.
The study found that thinking you’re addicted was more strongly tied to feelings of lost control than measures of how much someone actually used the app or how automatic their habits had become. The perception itself was doing the damage.
Anderson and Wood argue that widespread use of the addiction label for social media is a public health concern. It’s not just imprecise language. It’s actively interfering with people’s ability to regulate their technology use.
A Better Way Forward
The researchers don’t suggest that social media is harmless or that excessive use isn’t worth addressing. They acknowledge that roughly 2% of users may experience genuinely concerning symptoms that deserve clinical attention and support.
But for the vast majority of Instagram users struggling to control their time on the app, recognizing the role of habit rather than addiction opens up more practical pathways for change. Understanding that automatic responses to environmental cues drive most Instagram use makes it easier to modify those patterns through environmental changes and habit replacement.
The study also shows how public health messaging needs to be careful about the language it uses. When authorities and media outlets label everyday behaviors as addictions without distinguishing between clinical and colloquial uses of the term, they may inadvertently make it harder for people to address those behaviors.
The U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory on social media and youth mental health drew attention to potential harms. But Anderson and Wood’s research suggests that framing frequent use primarily as addiction may undermine users’ ability to manage their behavior.
For most people scrolling Instagram daily, the news is actually encouraging. You’re probably not addicted. You’ve probably just built some automatic habits. And habits, unlike addictions, respond well to practical environmental changes that you can implement on your own.
Paper Notes
Study Limitations
The research focused specifically on Instagram users in Study 1 and included both Instagram and TikTok users in supplementary analyses. While Study 1 used a quota sample designed to match U.S. demographics for age, gender, political views, and race, the findings may not generalize to users of other social media platforms or to populations outside the United States. Study 2 excluded participants who weren’t willing to reflect on feeling addicted to Instagram or who provided incomplete responses to the addiction reflection task, which may have selected for users who found the addiction framing more personally relevant. The experimental manipulation in Study 2 involved only brief exposure to addiction framing, so longer-term effects of repeated addiction messaging remain uncertain. The study relied heavily on self-report measures, which can be influenced by demand characteristics and social desirability biases. The addiction classification based on the Bergen Instagram Addiction Scale identified users “at risk” for addiction rather than providing clinical diagnoses.
Funding and Disclosures
The authors declared no competing interests. No specific funding information was provided in the published paper.
Publication Details
Authors: Ian A. Anderson (California Institute of Technology) and Wendy Wood (University of Southern California). Published in Scientific Reports, Volume 15, Article 39388, on November 27, 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-27053-2. The study included 380 participants in Study 1 and 824 participants in Study 2, all recruited from Prolific and compensated at California minimum wage rates.







