Tinnitus (ringing in ears)

(Photo by PeopleImages.com - Yuri A on Shutterstock)

In A Nutshell

  • Nearly one in five people seeking help for bothersome tinnitus reported cutting work hours, stopping work entirely, or going on disability because of the condition
  • Over half of study participants said tinnitus made them less effective at their jobs, with problems including difficulty concentrating, communication challenges, and fatigue
  • After completing an eight-week online therapy program, 91% reported tinnitus no longer forced them to work less, and 75% said they were no longer less effective at work
  • Most workplace policies don’t explicitly recognize tinnitus as a disability, leaving employees without clear paths to accommodations or support

Plenty of jobs expect employees working rain or shine, and most bosses probably won’t take “a ringing in my ear” as a valid excuse to skip work. Well, research from Anglia Ruskin University reveals that among people with bothersome tinnitus seeking help, 19% reported cutting back their work hours, stopping work entirely, or going on disability because of the condition.

Here’s just one example: the operator knew he had to quit when he could no longer hear the alarms. The constant ringing in his ears (tinnitus) had gotten so bad that he couldn’t make out the radio communications either. “I was an operator on a DCS and could no longer hear some alarms or understand the radio, which was getting very dangerous for others,” he explained to researchers.

Crucially, however, those who completed an eight-week online therapy program reported getting their productivity back.

Tinnitus, or that persistent ringing, buzzing, or humming sound in the ears that has no external source, affects about 15% of the population. Most people learn to live with it. But for those who can’t tune it out, the condition becomes a workplace liability that’s been largely overlooked by employers, researchers, and disability policies.

Woman has a headache at her work desk
Tinnitus can make it incredibly difficult to be productive at work. (© sebra – stock.adobe.com)

When Quiet Becomes Unbearable

Scientists studied 449 adults seeking help for their tinnitus, people who’d been living with the condition for an average of 12 years. Most were in their mid-50s and still working. The research team, led by Dr. Eldre Beukes, wanted to understand something that hadn’t been explored much: how does constant phantom noise affect someone’s ability to do their job?

The answer came in two forms. First, there were the numbers. Before any treatment, 81% of participants reported they were still maintaining their regular work schedules despite the tinnitus. But the remaining 19% had made significant changes: cutting hours, leaving jobs, or collecting disability payments. Looking at the full sample, 57% reported feeling at least somewhat less effective at their jobs, with many struggling with tasks that once came easily.

Tinnitus sufferers face severe struggles at work
(Infographic by StudyFinds)

Then there were the stories. When researchers asked 310 participants to describe how tinnitus affected their work, 72% reported negative impacts. The problems fell into predictable patterns: difficulty concentrating in quiet offices, taking longer to complete familiar tasks, making more mistakes, and struggling through fatigue from poor sleep.

Communication became a minefield. People missed critical information in meetings, couldn’t hear soft-spoken colleagues, and found phone calls exhausting. Some withdrew from group projects. Others cancelled meetings when the ringing grew too loud. One person described getting fired after tinnitus-related anxiety and depression lowered their productivity.

Career modifications followed. Some people shifted from client-facing roles to administrative work. Others left professions they’d trained for years to enter. A musician quit performing because they couldn’t handle loud venues anymore. People who’d loved their work reported that anxiety, frustration, and irritability had drained the joy from it.

What is tinnitus?
What is Tinnitus? (Image by VectorMine on Shutterstock)

The Cognitive Load Problem

There’s a reason tinnitus hits workplace performance so hard. The brain treats the phantom sound as real noise competing for attention. In environments requiring concentration (which describes most modern work) tinnitus creates constant cognitive interference. Tasks that once happened automatically now require conscious effort.

People with bothersome tinnitus also tend to struggle with anxiety, depression, and insomnia, all of which compound the problem. Poor sleep means showing up to work already drained. Anxiety makes the ringing seem louder. Depression saps motivation. It’s a feedback loop that grinds down performance over time.

But roughly a quarter of participants in the study refused to let tinnitus win. “It’s in my attitude. I won’t let it get in my way at work,” one person explained. These participants had developed coping strategies, found ways to focus despite the noise, and pushed through the difficulties. Their success raised a question: could these strategies be taught to others?

Tinnitus impacts in workplace
(Infographic by StudyFinds)

What Worked

Two hundred participants completed an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy program designed specifically for tinnitus. Over eight weeks, they worked through modules on understanding how tinnitus works, practicing relaxation techniques, improving sleep, managing attention, and developing long-term coping strategies. A tinnitus clinician monitored their progress and answered questions.

The results, published in Brain Sciences, showed meaningful improvements. Before treatment, participants rated their tinnitus distress at 52.5 on a 100-point scale. After completing the program, that number dropped to 33.1 and stayed low at 29.1 two months later. Anxiety, depression, and insomnia all improved as well.

More importantly, people reported being able to work again. After treatment, 91% said tinnitus was no longer forcing them to work less, compared to 81% before starting the program. Among those who completed the two-month follow-up assessment, 75% reported they were no longer less effective at work, up from 43% before treatment.

The therapy didn’t eliminate the ringing. Tinnitus has no cure. Instead, it helped people change their relationship with the sound, making it less intrusive and easier to ignore during work tasks.

Tinnitus: Online Therapy Infographic
(Infographic by StudyFinds)

The Workplace Gap

Despite these findings, most workplace policies don’t acknowledge tinnitus as a legitimate disability. Regulations address hearing loss and noise exposure, but tinnitus rarely gets mentioned. Employees struggling with the condition often suffer in silence, worried about stigma or unsure what accommodations might help.

Reasonable adjustments could include flexible scheduling, access to sound-masking devices or specialized headphones, optimized workspaces that reduce auditory stress, and support for accessing therapy programs like the one tested in this study. Many people with tinnitus also have hearing loss and might benefit from hearing aids at work.

The study had limitations. There was no control group, so researchers can’t say with certainty that the therapy caused the improvements rather than time passing or other factors. About half the participants dropped out before completing the post-treatment questionnaires, which might mean only the most satisfied people reported back. The study also relied on participants’ own assessments rather than objective workplace measures.

Still, the pattern is clear enough to warrant attention. For the 19% of people in this study whose tinnitus forced career modifications, those who completed the intervention reported measurable improvements. Better workplace awareness, combined with access to evidence-based treatment, might keep more people in jobs they’re trained for and prevent premature exits from the workforce.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult with qualified healthcare providers regarding any medical condition or treatment options. The information presented here is based on a single research study and should not be used to make decisions about individual health or employment situations.


Paper Notes

Study Limitations

This exploratory study had several important limitations. Researchers did not include a control group, making it difficult to determine whether observed improvements resulted specifically from the intervention or from natural changes over time, placebo effects, or regression to the mean. The study relied entirely on self-reported perceptions, which could introduce recall bias and social desirability bias. Many questions lacked established validity and reliability evidence.

Significant attrition occurred, with many participants failing to complete post-intervention questionnaires. This introduced potential sampling bias, as only those experiencing positive changes may have been inclined to respond. Participants cited various reasons for dropping out, including time constraints, competing life priorities such as caregiving responsibilities, and disengagement either after receiving sufficient benefit or finding questionnaires too burdensome.

The study did not account for potential confounding variables such as whether participants received concurrent tinnitus treatments during the study period, changes in work environments or demands, or major life events and stressors that might independently affect work productivity. Future research should address these confounding variables and study limitations, incorporate validated workplace functioning measures, and use more robust study designs including control groups.

Funding and Disclosures

This study was partly funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders (NIDCD) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) under award number R21DC017214. The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The original data presented in the study are openly available in FigShare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.311645321.

Publication Details

Authors: Eldre Beukes (Centre for Better Living, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK; Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative Initiative Between the University of Colorado and the University of Pretoria), Jennine A. Sharpe (Centre for Better Living, Anglia Ruskin University; Department of Material Sciences and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge), Gerhard Andersson (Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden; HEI-Lab, Lusófona University, Portugal), and Vinaya Manchaiah (Virtual Hearing Lab; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine; UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital; Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria; Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal University, India). | Journal: Brain Sciences, 2026, Volume 16, Issue 2, Article 150 | Title: “Exploring the Impact of Tinnitus on Work Productivity” | DOI: 10.3390/brainsci16020150 | Study Registration: Clinical Trials.gov registration numbers NCT04004260 and NCT04335812 | Ethics Approval: Institutional Review Board at Lamar University (IRB-FY17-209, approved June 7, 2019 and IRB-FY20-200 approved April 2, 2000) | Publication Date: January 29, 2026 | License: Open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply