Cheerful office workers laugh share takeaway pizza together

(© fizkes - stock.adobe.com)

In a nutshell

  • Trust and happiness create a positive feedback loop: Trusting others makes us happier, and being happy makes us more trusting of others over time.
  • The type of trust matters: Personal relationships have the strongest impact on well-being, followed by general trust in humanity, while institutional trust has the weakest (but still significant) effect.
  • Age plays a crucial role: Children, teens, and older adults benefit most from trust, while young and middle-aged adults show weaker connections between trust and happiness.

UTRECHT, Netherlands — Want to feel happier and more satisfied with life? The secret might be as simple as trusting the people around you.

A massive new study involving more than 2.5 million people across the globe has found something remarkable: our willingness to trust others — whether it’s our neighbors, institutions, or strangers — has a profound impact on our mental well-being. And this connection holds true whether you’re 6 years old or 83.

The research, published in Psychological Bulletin, analyzed nearly 1,000 studies to paint the clearest picture yet of how trust and happiness are intertwined. The finding works both ways: not only does trusting others make us happier, but being happy makes us more likely to trust others. As the researchers put it: “Trust and well-being mutually reinforce each other over time.”

For most of us, the connection makes intuitive sense. Those moments when you felt most content probably involved feeling secure in your relationships, confident in your community, or optimistic about the institutions around you. Conversely, times of deep mistrust, whether toward a partner who betrayed you or a government that disappointed you, likely coincided with periods of anxiety or sadness.

Different Types of Trust Have Different Effects

Researchers from Utrecht University examined three distinct types of trust, each carrying different weight when it comes to our well-being. Interpersonal trust, which is the faith we place in people we know personally like family, friends, and coworkers, had the strongest connection to happiness. Generalized trust, which refers to our basic faith in strangers and humanity at large, came in second. Institutional trust, or our confidence in governments, police, banks, and other organizations, showed the weakest association with well-being, though it was still significant.

The study also revealed interesting patterns about different aspects of well-being. Trust showed the strongest connection to life satisfaction — that broad sense of contentment with how things are going overall. Its relationship with positive emotions like joy and excitement was somewhat weaker, and weakest of all with negative feelings like anxiety and depression.

Teamwork concept: Hands together in a group huddle
Research shows that trusting our friends, family, and colleagues has a strong connection to how content we are in life. (Photo by PeopleImages.com – Yuri A on Shuterstock)

Age Changes Everything About Trust and Happiness

Perhaps most surprisingly, the trust-happiness connection wasn’t consistent across all age groups. Children, teenagers, and older adults showed the strongest links between trusting others and feeling good about life. Young adults and middle-aged people, by contrast, showed weaker associations.

For young people, the researchers explain that “forming and maintaining supportive social connections is one of the most important tasks for youth development and consequently a strong predictor of well-being.” Trust plays a crucial role in this process.

For older adults, trust becomes important again but for different reasons. As physical and cognitive abilities decline, seniors become more dependent on others for care and support. Being able to trust caregivers, family members, and institutions becomes essential for maintaining well-being. The researchers note that older adults prioritize existing relationships more heavily because they’re increasingly aware of their limited time remaining.

The middle years of life, when people are often focused on career advancement and establishing independence, may be a time when self-reliance matters more than trust in others for overall happiness.

Living in a High-Trust Country Makes All the Difference

One of the study’s most striking findings was how national culture shapes the trust-happiness relationship. In countries where people generally trust each other more, like Nordic nations such as Finland and Denmark, the individual benefits of being trusting were even greater.

The researchers found that higher national-level generalized trust reflects individuals’ belief in “a country’s ability to provide a safe, prosperous, and cooperative social environment for its citizens.” Living in such an environment amplifies the psychological benefits of individual trustfulness.

If you’re a naturally trusting person living in a low-trust society, you might not reap the same mental health benefits as someone with the same disposition living somewhere with stronger social cohesion.

Interestingly, gender didn’t seem to matter much. Despite longstanding research suggesting women are more relationship-oriented, both men and women showed similar patterns in how trust affected their well-being.

The Trust-Happiness Feedback Loop

One of the study’s most important takeaways was establishing that trust and happiness feed off each other over time. Using data that followed the same people across multiple years, researchers were able to show that trusting people became happier, and happy people became more trusting.

The mechanism makes psychological sense: when we’re in good moods, we tend to see the world through rose-colored glasses, interpreting ambiguous situations more charitably and giving others the benefit of the doubt. Conversely, when we trust others, we’re more likely to engage socially, build supportive relationships, and create the conditions that promote happiness.

In an era marked by declining institutional trust and growing social polarization, the research offers both warning and hope. As trust erodes, so too may our collective well-being. But understanding that trust and happiness can reinforce each other means that investments in building more trustworthy communities could pay dividends in public mental health for generations to come.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers conducted a multilevel meta-analysis, combining data from 991 effect sizes across 488 studies involving 2,518,769 participants. They searched four major academic databases and used machine learning tools to screen over 15,000 records. The studies spanned multiple countries and age groups, from children as young as 6 to adults in their 80s. Both cross-sectional studies (measuring trust and well-being at one point in time) and longitudinal studies (following people over time) were included.

Results

The analysis found a positive association between trust and subjective well-being with an overall correlation of .21. Interpersonal trust showed the strongest association (.25), followed by generalized trust (.20) and institutional trust (.17). Life satisfaction was more strongly linked to trust than positive or negative emotions. The relationship was strongest among children/adolescents and older adults, and varied by national levels of generalized trust. Longitudinal analyses confirmed that trust predicts future well-being and well-being predicts future trust.

Limitations

The study found evidence of potential publication bias in cross-sectional studies. Most research came from Western countries, limiting global generalizability. Only English-language studies were included. The analysis relied primarily on self-reported measures of trust and well-being. Many potentially relevant studies couldn’t be included due to insufficient statistical information, and causal conclusions remain tentative despite longitudinal data.

Funding and Disclosures

The paper did not report specific funding sources or conflicts of interest. The research was preregistered and all materials, data, and analysis code were made available through the Open Science Framework for transparency and replication.

Publication Information

This research was published in Psychological Bulletin in 2025. The study was conducted by researchers from Utrecht University’s Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science and The Education University of Hong Kong’s Department of Early Childhood Education. The full citation and supplemental materials are available through the American Psychological Association.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

6 Comments

  1. T. says:

    Scott, I don’t usually comment on articles, but when I read your post I wanted to interject.

    If this person returns to do your lawn all season after you, “pre-paid” him/her consider yourself truly blessed. Young people these days really struggle to count money and this person may have counted it three times because he/she was struggling. Also, I personally do not like setting someone up to tell you that you overpaid him or her. I can assure you even if this person could count, the assumption was that the extra money was a tip.
    You cannot think young people today assess things as you do, they do not. As an educator, I see a lot and your method of assessment when it comes to trustworthiness isn’t a valid metric.
    Let this go is my advice. Best Regards

  2. david says:

    as america has become more multicultural/ multiracial trust has eroded in our society, when people have less in common they trust each other less

  3. Dave says:

    trust will get you stabbed in the back

  4. Scott says:

    As an “older” adult, I’ve experienced a multitude of situations where the trust, I had with others, was taken advantage of. In turn, I can no longer “trust” as I used to.

    I live alone (except for my dog and cat). This may SOUND sad but, for me, it works because I no longer feel guilty of having so many different levels of trust for different people / groups.

    For the majority of my life, my trusting others, was my default (automatically trusting someone until proven that my trust was wasted on those looking to find someone to take advantage of).

    It is a sad commentary regarding the society that has turned into one of, “how can I take advantage of someone in order to enrich myself”.

    A quick example: I asked the guy , who mows my lawn, if this year I could just pay him for the the entire year instead of having to remember to leave money on my front porch on the days he mows my lawn. We both agreed that a fair amount would be $600.00. As I do with any “contractor”, I placed $650.00 in the envelope as a “test”. Like I mentioned, I try this test with anyone I can, to help gauge the trustworthiness of a person or organization.

    Most people make a point to bring “my error” to my attention and attempt to return the extra money. I ALWAYS explain why there was more, in the envelope, and due to their honesty, I insist they keep the money.

    On “grass mowing day” I watched the guy count the money THREE times before he put all of the money in his pocket.

    At the end of the “grass mowing season” I will, certainly but politely inform him of what I did and what I had expected him to do (ie: return the extra $50.00) but instead, pocket the extra money so as to self enrich himself. I will, also, explain to him that his not returning the extra money will be my reason for not utilizing his services next year and would, without a doubt, relay this experience to the 8-10 people who ask for recommendations for lawn care.

    To many, this may seem like a trivial thing but, I have him, on video counting the money three times. The video is clear that he counted out 13 fifty dollar bills ($650.00) instead of 12 fifty dollar bills (the $600.00 that we agreed upon.

    I’ve given him EVERY “benefit of the doubt” to being as bold as to look him in the eyes and asking if the correct amount ($600.00) was in the envelope and if he was satisfied with the $600.00 that we had agreed upon. He looked me in the eyes and said that he was satisfied with our arrangement and looked forward to continuing our business arrangement for years to come.

    Trust. I gave it to him and he spit it out for only $50.00 Next year he will find himself with one less customer as well as the recommendations that have turned into additional customers, over the last few years.

    1. Marie says:

      Might he have thought the extra $50 was a tip?

  5. Stark says:

    Trust is a luxury when one can’t even trust oneself.