Is our universe one big virtual reality? How to test if we’re really living in a computer simulation

By Melvin M. Vopson, University of Portsmouth

Physicists have long struggled to explain why the universe started out with conditions suitable for life to evolve. Why do the physical laws and constants take the very specific values that allow stars, planets and ultimately life to develop? The expansive force of the universe, dark energy, for example, is much weaker than theory suggests it should be – allowing matter to clump together rather than being ripped apart.

A common answer is that we live in an infinite multiverse of universes, so we shouldn’t be surprised that at least one universe has turned out as ours. But another is that our universe is a computer simulation, with someone (perhaps an advanced alien species) fine-tuning the conditions.

The latter option is supported by a branch of science called information physics, which suggests that space-time and matter are not fundamental phenomena. Instead, the physical reality is fundamentally made up of bits of information, from which our experience of space-time emerges. By comparison, temperature “emerges” from the collective movement of atoms. No single atom fundamentally has temperature.

This leads to the extraordinary possibility that our entire universe might in fact be a computer simulation. The idea is not that new. In 1989, the legendary physicist, John Archibald Wheeler, suggested that the universe is fundamentally mathematical and it can be seen as emerging from information. He coined the famous aphorism “it from bit”.

In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom from Oxford University in the UK formulated his simulation hypothesis. This argues that it is actually highly probable that we live in a simulation. That’s because an advanced civilisation should reach a point where their technology is so sophisticated that simulations would be indistinguishable from reality, and the participants would not be aware that they were in a simulation.

YouTube video

Physicist Seth Lloyd from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US took the simulation hypothesis to the next level by suggesting that the entire universe could be a giant quantum computer. And in 2016, Elon Musk concluded “We’re most likely in a simulation” (see video above).

Empirical evidence

There is some evidence suggesting that our physical reality could be a simulated virtual reality rather than an objective world that exists independently of the observer.

Any virtual reality world will be based on information processing. That means everything is ultimately digitised or pixelated down to a minimum size that cannot be subdivided further: bits. This appears to mimic our reality according to the theory of quantum mechanics, which rules the world of atoms and particles. It states there is a smallest, discrete unit of energy, length and time. Similarly, elementary particles, which make up all the visible matter in the universe, are the smallest units of matter. To put it simply, our world is pixelated.

The laws of physics that govern everything in the universe also resemble computer code lines that a simulation would follow in the execution of the program. Moreover, mathematical equations, numbers and geometric patterns are present everywhere – the world appears to be entirely mathematical.

Another curiosity in physics supporting the simulation hypothesis is the maximum speed limit in our universe, which is the speed of light. In a virtual reality, this limit would correspond to the speed limit of the processor, or the processing power limit. We know that an overloaded processor slows down computer processing in a simulation. Similarly, Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity shows that time slows in the vicinity of a black hole.

Perhaps the most supportive evidence of the simulation hypothesis comes from quantum mechanics. This suggest nature isn’t “real”: particles in determined states, such as specific locations, don’t seem to exist unless you actually observe or measure them. Instead, they are in a mix of different states simultaneously. Similarly, virtual reality needs an observer or programmer for things to happen.

Quantum “entanglement” also allows two particles to be spookily connected so that if you manipulate one, you automatically and immediately also manipulate the other, no matter how far apart they are – with the effect being seemingly faster than the speed of light, which should be impossible.

This could, however, also be explained by the fact that within a virtual reality code, all “locations” (points) should be roughly equally far from a central processor. So while we may think two particles are millions of light years apart, they wouldn’t be if they were created in a simulation.

Possible experiments

Assuming that the universe is indeed a simulation, then what sort of experiments could we deploy from within the simulation to prove this?

It is reasonable to assume that a simulated universe would contain a lot of information bits everywhere around us. These information bits represent the code itself. Hence, detecting these information bits will prove the simulation hypothesis. The recently proposed mass-energy-information (M/E/I) equivalence principle – suggesting mass can be expressed as energy or information, or vice versa – states that information bits must have a small mass. This gives us something to search for.

I have postulated that information is in fact a fifth form of matter in the universe. I’ve even calculated the expected information content per elementary particle. These studies led to the publication, in 2022, of an experimental protocol to test these predictions. The experiment involves erasing the information contained inside elementary particles by letting them and their antiparticles (all particles have “anti” versions of themselves which are identical but have opposite charge) annihilate in a flash of energy – emitting “photons”, or light particles.

I have predicted the exact range of expected frequencies of the resulting photons based on information physics. The experiment is highly achievable with our existing tools, and we have launched a crowdfunding site) to achieve it.

There are other approaches too. The late physicist John Barrow has argued that a simulation would build up minor computational errors which the programmer would need to fix in order to keep it going. He suggested we might experience such fixing as contradictory experimental results appearing suddenly, such as the constants of nature changing. So monitoring the values of these constants is another option.

The nature of our reality is one of the greatest mysteries out there. The more we take the simulation hypothesis seriously, the greater the chances we may one day prove or disprove it.The Conversation

Melvin M. Vopson is a Senior Lecturer in Physics at the University of Portsmouth. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Follow on Google News

About the Author

The Conversation

The Conversation is a nonprofit news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of academic experts for the public. The Conversation’s team of 21 editors works with researchers to help them explain their work clearly and without jargon.

The contents of this website do not constitute advice and are provided for informational purposes only. See our full disclaimer


  1. It seems like the ultimate hubris–we invented computers, so obviously the universe around us must be some sort of computerized reality. We’re making God in our own image, once again.

  2. No one likes the idea of not having free will; but superdeterminism in a holographic universe negates the simulation hypothesis because simulation implies variables lead to an uncertain end-staate (high entropy). Everything that will happen, has already happened if time really exists independent of the univers’s nested conciousnesses. See the hidden variable problem, and why/when/how an observer “decides” to take an measurement such as in a double-slit exp. There’s no point of a sim. or game if the outcome has been pre-ordained by an exclusive arbitrarer of matter/data. This leads us to the question of, what gains are to be had by pulling the strings of concious entities ?

    1. A computer game (life) has all of its possibilites and endings pre-programed by the programmer (God). Every action and possible combos already exists. There’s still freewill for the players, because even the programmer can’t possibly predict what movements or actions the players will take. As we play the “game”, our consciousness move through the program in its sequential order (linear time), thus we can enjoy and experience the game without knowing what or how the outcomes will be or could be. I believe this is what it means when referring to God’s saying, “Even before you ask, I will have answered.” Everything in the universes, all possibilities, were already created for us to explore and manifest. We can choose what to do or not to do with our freewill.

  3. The universe is not a simulation – only the earth is a simulation. The rest of the universe is just a background hologram.
    It takes energy to produce a simulation and one way to economise on the energy used is not to make all the observed planets and stars in the universe individually but just create a holographic background for the earth.
    Also, you could make a very small “virtual earth” compared to the original (from which the simulation is being produced) in order to to economise on energy consumption where (as the Bible says) the inhabitants (us) were like “grasshoppers” compared with the “giants of the earth at that time” (the creators of the simulation) who were claimed in the Bible to be 450 Feet tall!
    Add these two “energy saving” exercises to the obvious limitation of the maximum speed of light
    computer generated Hologram which creates the rest of the universe (except for the earth) and the evidence for an artificially created earth and universe seems to me to be overwhelming.
    The original intention was announced by “The Creator” in Isaiah when he said:
    “I will create a New Heavens and a New Earth and the former will not be remembered, nor come to mind”
    The Bible tells us about the creation it but had to do so in simple terms which we can only now begin to understand after 6000 years

Comments are closed.