e cigarette, vaping, blu cigs

Photo by lindsayfox by Pixabay

LOS ANGELES — E-cigarettes were once marketed as a “healthier” alternative to smoking tobacco products, but research showing that both can lead to the same diseases continues to surface. Now, a group of researchers from the Keck School of Medicine of USC are saying for the first time that vapers and smokers have similar levels of DNA damage.

“For the first time, we showed that the more vapers used e-cigarettes, and the longer they used them, the more DNA damage occurred in their oral cells,” says senior author Ahmad Besarantinia, PhD, MPH, professor of research population and public health sciences at the Keck School of Medicine, in a university release. “The same pattern held up in smokers.”

The study builds on previous research conducted by Besaratinia and his team, which showed that vaping has a link to genetic alterations as well as other biological changes that lead to disease.

To delve deeper into this, the team recruited 72 healthy adults and split them into three groups — matching them by age, race, and gender. Researchers split them into current vapers (who never smoked), current smokers (who never vaped), and people who never tried either habit. They used detailed questionnaires and interviews to verify each participant’s history as well as biochemical tests to ensure that any findings could be attributable to either vaping or smoking.

“We designed our study to tease out the effects of vaping in e-cigarette users who were neither cigarette smokers nor dual users at any point in their lives,” Besaratinia explains.

The team also collected data on how frequently, and for how long, participants smoked or vaped. Among vapers, they recorded what devices and flavors participants used. Study authors then collected epithelial cell samples for analysis from every participant’s mouth in order to test for damage to specific genes.

Results show that DNA damage was 2.6 times greater in vapers and 2.2 times greater in smokers compared to that of non-users. Interestingly, vapers who used pods had the highest levels of DNA damage, followed by those who used mods — which are larger. The team also found that sweet-flavored vapes had an association with the highest levels of DNA damage, followed by mint and fruit flavors.

These findings are incredibly important to public health, considering that vapes are popular among both adolescents and young adults. In the U.S. alone, over 10 percent of American teens and over three percent of adults use them. The USC researchers argue there should be more transparent messaging about the dangers of e-cigarettes, or at least how they aren’t healthier than tobacco cigarettes.

Besarantinia and the team look ahead to replicating their findings with a larger sample size. They also plan to study other biological effects that come stem from DNA damage.

The findings are published in the journal Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

About Shyla Cadogan, RD

Shyla Cadogan is a DMV-Based acute care Registered Dietitian. She holds specialized interests in integrative nutrition and communicating nutrition concepts in a nuanced, approachable way.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink


Chris Melore


Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor


  1. DCM says:

    This is beginning to sound like the stuff we used to hear about pot.

  2. Greg Baughman says:

    And this is why people don’t trust doctors.
    How can fog machine juice NOT BE SAFER than burning plants and inhaling the smoke?
    What a crock.

  3. Not For You Silly says:

    I think it is interesting how these studies ignore improved lung function, reduced shortness of breath, and do not produce tar or carbon monoxide. Tar and Carbon Monoxide being two of the most dangerous side effects of burning hydrocarbons and inhaling the smoke.

    The problem is that this information will get taken out of context. Fact: Vaping is safer than Smoking. Is it as safe as not smoking and not vaping? Of course not, but that is not what people focus on.

    Also – the YouTube (great source………………………………………../s) is absolutely false. Second hand vaping can lead to bronchitis. Here is a reliable source. My partner and I have both vaped for 11 years and neither one of us has had bronchitis. Hmmm I wonder why that is if the video is stating a statistically relevant fact? Oh, it is because it is not. Right….

    Sites like this get under my skin where only a portion of the information needed to understand CONTEXT is provided. Based on the 15 ads on this page – chances are they are in financial trouble anyways. Good Riddance in advance.