insults sad woman

(Photo by Keira Burton from Pexels)

UTRECHT, Netherlands — Hearing an insult feels like a “mini slap in the face” regardless of the comment’s context, according to a study of brain scans. Researchers have found that even in a neutral setting with no context, like a lab, hearing or reading negative comments about yourself or others does emotional damage to the brain.

Study authors in the Netherlands wanted to examine the unique connection between emotion and language. They studied 79 women using electroencephalography (EEG) and skin conductance recordings to measure how the brain responds to three different kinds of speech — insults, compliments, and neutral facts.

The researchers note that humans are highly social creatures who often rely on interpersonal relationships to survive and thrive. Their results show words really can hurt.

“The exact way in which words can deliver their offensive, emotionally negative payload at the moment these words are being read or heard is not yet well-understood,” says corresponding author Dr. Marijn Struiksma from Utrecht University in a media release.

Since insults pose “a threat” to someone’s reputation and their sense of “self,” researchers say they provide a unique opportunity to study the language-emotion dynamic.

“Understanding what an insulting expression does to people as it unfolds, and why, is of considerable importance to psycholinguists interested in how language moves people, but also to others who wish to understand the details of social behavior,” Struiksma adds.

What do insults do to the brain?

“We assume that verbal insults trigger a cascade of rapidly consecutive or overlapping processing effects, and that different parts of that cascade might be differently affected by repetition, with some of them rapidly wearing off, and others remaining strongly responsive for a long time,” Struiksma explains.

In their experiment, researchers had the 79 participants read insults (for example, “Linda is horrible”), compliments (“Linda is impressive”), and factually correct descriptive statements (“Linda is Dutch”).

Half of the statements used the reader’s name — meaning the participant was reading insults about themselves. The other half used another person’s name. The experiment did not involve any other people handing out the compliments or insults. Instead, researchers told each woman that the comments were made by three random (fictional) men.

However, even in a lab setting with no real human interactions, the study finds verbal insults still “get at you” no matter who the insult targets. Even after repeating the exercise, the insults continue to “slap” people.

Specifically, EEG scans show that an insult affects the P2 amplitude. This is a waveform component of the event-related potential (ERP) which scientists measure in the scalp.

“Our study shows that in a psycholinguistic laboratory experiment without real interaction between speakers, insults deliver lexical ‘mini slaps in the face’, such that the strongly negative evaluative words involved that a participant reads, automatically grab attention during lexical retrieval, regardless of how often that retrieval occurs,” Struiksma concludes.

The team adds that insults immediately capture the brain’s attention, and the emotional meaning of these comments stick in our long-term memory. Conversely, compliments triggered a weaker P2 effect, proving that there’s a negativity bias when it comes to a person’s attention during social interactions.

The study is published in the journal Frontiers in Communication.

About Chris Melore

Chris Melore has been a writer, researcher, editor, and producer in the New York-area since 2006. He won a local Emmy award for his work in sports television in 2011.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink


Chris Melore


Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

1 Comment

  1. Carol Kauffman says:

    I was a speech-language pathologist for over 40 years collaborating with other professionals in treating children and adults with a variety of cognitive-communication challenges. I was also the parent of a son who died by overdose in 2020, two months into the start of the pandemic, at age 40. He was doing well until all his “go-to” therapies disappeared – the gym, family, friends (due to isolation) and the fear we all had not knowing what the outcome of this horrendous disease would lead to. But from being with those with challenges 24/7 for 40 years – either my own kid or others, I am certain of one thing – we all desperately need to be supported, respected, and treated kindly with compassion and expert knowledge. These services need to be available, affordable, and accessible to everyone, all the time. In addition, we need many more professionals who know more about brain-body challenges – from ADHD and oppositional-defiant disorder in children to addiction and depression in teens and adults and are able to effectively treat them. We need more research. Do we really need to pay oil companies and the military-industrial complex billions more? What if that money could go to more humane efforts? I’ve seen the effects of even simple techniques involving language interaction in improving behavior in children. It’s truly miraculous. I’m not excusing the behavior of the Parkland shooter. But in almost all cases, I see explanations. Yes. Take their AR 15s away. But when “unusual” behavior is noted at age 2, let’s all ask: “What trauma happened to this child?” rather than “Those parents didn’t set enough boundaries”. So many traumatized children go untreated. “Hurt people hurt people”. Let’s treat the hurt, so the chances of their hurting others is lessened, while we also discuss gun control. It’s a win-win.