(© Drazen - stock.adobe.com)
In A Nutshell
- Researchers studied 10,690 adults from Italy and found that larger waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios are linked to poorer physical performance.
- Participants with abnormal waist measurements took significantly longer to complete a simple chair stand test — a key marker for future mobility.
- Waist-to-height ratio emerged as the most reliable predictor across all age groups and both sexes.
- The findings suggest that a simple tape measure may help people and clinicians identify risks for functional decline and take early action.
ROME — Skip the bathroom scale. Scientists say a simple tape measure around your waist might be the best predictor of how your body will hold up as you get older.
A study of nearly 11,000 people found that those with larger waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios performed significantly worse on basic physical tasks. The research, published in the journal Aging, reveals that belly fat distribution serves as a powerful indicator of future mobility and strength.
People with abnormal waist measurements took longer to complete a simple test of getting up and down from a chair five times – a basic movement that health experts consider crucial for maintaining independence with age. The pattern held true across different age groups and both men and women.
The study reveals that carrying extra weight around the midsection could signal future mobility problems, difficulty with daily tasks, and potentially more serious health complications.

The Numbers Tell a Clear Story About Waist Health
Researchers from the Gemelli University Hospital in Italy examined data from 10,690 participants with an average age of 57, tracking their health from 2018 to 2024. About 54% were women recruited from public places like shopping centers and exhibitions across various Italian cities.
Scientists focused on two measurements that anyone can take at home: waist-to-hip ratio (waist circumference divided by hip circumference) and waist-to-height ratio (waist circumference divided by height).
The thresholds for concern were clear-cut. Men with waist-to-hip ratios above 0.90 and women above 0.85 were considered at risk. For waist-to-height ratios, anything above 0.5 spelled trouble for both sexes.
Men showed alarming rates of problematic measurements: 61% had concerning waist-to-hip ratios and 71% exceeded healthy waist-to-height thresholds. Women fared better but still showed significant numbers, with 39% having abnormal waist-to-hip ratios and 53% exceeding waist-to-height limits.
A Simple Chair Test Reveals Major Health Insights
Researchers measured physical performance using a straightforward test: participants stood up from a chair and sat back down five times as quickly as possible with arms crossed over their chest. Despite its simplicity, this “chair stand test” powerfully predicts overall physical function and future health problems.
Women averaged 7.9 seconds to complete the test versus 7.6 seconds for men. However, the real story emerged when comparing people with normal versus abnormal waist measurements.
Even after accounting for age, smoking habits, diet, physical activity, and other health factors, people with larger waist measurements consistently struggled more. Those with abnormal waist-to-hip ratios were 28% more likely to have poor physical performance, while those with abnormal waist-to-height ratios faced a 32% higher risk.
Why Belly Fat Sabotages Physical Function
Excess abdominal fat, particularly the type surrounding internal organs (called visceral fat), creates serious biological problems. It releases inflammatory substances that interfere with muscle function and heart health. Visceral fat also infiltrates muscle tissue itself, reducing strength and flexibility.
The research points to an important connection between abdominal fat and sarcopenia – the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength that occurs with aging. Sarcopenia increases risks of falls, fractures, disability, and death. Abdominal fat appears to correlate with fat infiltration into muscle tissue, creating “marbled” muscles that generate less force and function poorly.
Waist-to-Height Ratio Emerges as Top Predictor
While both measurements proved useful, waist-to-height ratio consistently outperformed waist-to-hip ratio for identifying people with poor physical performance across all age groups and both sexes.
The practical advantage is clear: waist-to-height ratio requires only a tape measure and knowledge of height, while waist-to-hip ratio demands accurate measurement of both waist and hip circumferences.
Anyone can check their numbers by measuring waist circumference at the narrowest point between ribs and hips, then dividing by height (using the same units for both measurements). Results above 0.5 indicate increased health risks.
Healthcare providers could use these measurements to identify patients who might benefit from early interventions like targeted exercise programs or nutritional counseling. For individuals, paying attention to waist size rather than just overall weight could prove crucial for maintaining independence and quality of life.
The research transforms a simple tape measure into a powerful predictor of healthy aging. While genetics play a role, waist circumference – something largely within personal control – emerges as one of the most important numbers to track for long-term health and independence.
Disclaimer: This report summarizes findings from a cross-sectional observational study published in Aging. The study shows an association between waist measurements and physical performance, but does not establish direct causation. Always consult healthcare professionals for individual medical advice.
Paper Summary
Methodology
Researchers analyzed data from the Longevity Check-up 8+ project, recruiting 10,690 participants from Italian cities between 2018-2024. Participants were at least 18 years old, recruited from public places. The team measured waist and hip circumferences, calculated ratios, and assessed physical performance using a five-repetition chair stand test. They used statistical analyses to examine relationships between measurements and performance, adjusting for factors like age, gender, lifestyle habits, and health markers.
Results
The study found 49% of participants had abnormal waist-to-hip ratios and 61% had abnormal waist-to-height ratios, with men showing higher rates. People with abnormal waist measurements performed significantly worse on the chair test. After adjusting for other factors, those with abnormal waist-to-hip ratios had 28% increased risk of poor performance, while those with abnormal waist-to-height ratios had 32% increased risk. Waist-to-height ratio showed superior predictive capability.
Limitations
The cross-sectional design prevents establishing causality. The population was almost exclusively Caucasian, limiting broader applicability. Participants needed to reach recruitment sites, likely selecting healthier individuals. Pre-testing activities may have affected performance, and study settings may have influenced measurement accuracy.
Funding and Disclosures
The study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health—Ricerca Corrente 2025. Authors declared no conflicts of interest. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
Publication Information
Published in Aging, Volume 17, May 30, 2025. Title: “Impact of waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios on physical performance: insights from the Longevity Check-up 8+ project.” Authors from Rome, Italy institutions led by Anna Maria Martone and Francesco Landi.







