Watching movie

Could there be an upside to binge-watching your favorite shows? (© Drazen - stock.adobe.com)

Marathon Viewing (And Reading!) Linked to Mental Story Engagement That May Aid Coping, Study Suggests

In A Nutshell

  • People who binge-watch or read in long sessions are more likely to keep thinking about those stories later.
  • This ongoing reflection, called retrospective imaginative involvement (RII), may help people cope with stress and support well-being.
  • Enjoyable stories lead to simple recall; appreciated, thought-provoking stories inspire creative elaboration.
  • Stress shows mixed effects, but having more leisure time makes it easier to engage in this kind of mental storytelling.

ATLANTA — Sunday afternoon arrives, and instead of tackling that growing pile of laundry, someone finds themselves deep in a Netflix rabbit hole, rewatching scenes from The Office or mentally rewriting the ending to Game of Thrones. Most people would chalk this up to procrastination or guilty pleasure behavior. But new research suggests these mental wanderings into favorite TV shows and books may actually serve a psychological purpose.

A study published in Acta Psychologica shows that people who binge-watch television shows or read books for extended periods are more likely to engage in what researchers call retrospective imaginative involvement (RII). This means continuing to think about and mentally play with stories long after finishing them.

According to the research, individuals may draw on satisfying story elements from memory as a way to cope with daily stressors and potentially support well-being. Rather than viewing marathon viewing sessions as purely mindless behavior, the study suggests consecutive consumption may help people build richer mental models of stories that they can later revisit when stressed.

Consecutive Viewing Makes Stories More Memorable

Researchers from the University of Georgia, Michigan State University, and other institutions conducted two studies involving 540 undergraduate students. Participants identified memorable stories they often thought about when not actively consuming them, as well as unmemorable ones they rarely recalled.

The results painted a clear picture: stories consumed in longer, consecutive sessions, whether binge-watching multiple TV episodes or reading several book chapters at once, were significantly more memorable and more likely to spark ongoing mental engagement.

Man sitting on couch watching television
Binge-watching TV certainly is the best idea for your physical health, but new research shows it can have some psychological benefits. (© Wordley Calvo Stock – stock.adobe.com)

Television shows were especially prone to this effect. Stories that participants binge-watched were not only easier to recall but also became material for creative elaboration. Someone might replay favorite scenes from Friends during a stressful workday, or imagine how the Harry Potter series might have unfolded if Dumbledore had survived the final battle.

Participants with stronger tendencies to binge-watch consistently showed more mental engagement across all measured categories. The research builds on psychological theories suggesting that engaging with narratives allows people to temporarily expand beyond the limits of everyday life.

The study explains that narratives can provide a break from the work involved in protecting the self by offering an immersive space and a way to circumvent the taxing processes of self-control and self-maintenance required in daily life.

Different Story Types Trigger Different Mental Responses

The research also revealed that different kinds of stories inspire different kinds of mental engagement. Stories that were primarily enjoyable (like light comedies or adventures) tended to inspire simple mental replay, while more thought-provoking narratives inspired creative elaboration, such as imagining alternative scenarios or backstories.

Motivations also mattered. People who consumed stories to expand their boundaries, essentially seeking new perspectives, engaged more deeply than those who watched primarily to escape. Still, both groups showed benefits.

Stress, however, showed mixed effects. In one study, participants with higher stress engaged less in certain forms of mental storytelling, but in a follow-up study, stress had no measurable effect. By contrast, those with more leisure time were more likely to imaginatively revisit their favorite stories. The authors note that the relationship between stress and RII remains an open question.

Research Challenges Negative Views of Binge-Watching

While the study has limitations (it relied on college students’ self-reported memories rather than real-time measurement), it opens up new ways of thinking about media consumption. Rather than viewing binge-watching solely as addiction or wasted time, the research suggests it can sometimes serve meaningful psychological functions.

The ability to mentally revisit meaningful stories may be especially valuable at a time when many people feel isolated or overwhelmed. Having a mental library of engaging narratives could provide portable comfort and inspiration that people can access anywhere.

Still, the researchers caution that not all consecutive viewing is equally beneficial. The positive effects seem to emerge when people engage deeply with content that resonates with them personally, rather than passively consuming whatever happens to be available.

Disclaimer: This study does not prove that binge-watching improves mental health. It shows that consecutive viewing is linked to stronger memory of stories and ongoing mental engagement, which may help people cope with stress. Findings are based on college students’ self-reports and may not generalize to all populations.


Paper Summary

Methodology

Two studies with 540 undergraduates (average age ~20, majority female and white) from two Midwestern universities. Participants listed three memorable and three unmemorable stories. Researchers compared one story from each category, measuring consecutive consumption, motivations, enjoyment/appreciation, stress, leisure, and six types of RII.

Results

  • Stories consumed consecutively were more memorable and more likely to inspire RII.
  • Television shows, especially when binge-watched, strongly predicted later engagement.
  • Participants who tended to binge-watch engaged more in RII overall.
  • Enjoyable stories prompted simple recall; appreciated stories prompted creative elaboration.
  • Stress showed mixed effects; leisure time increased imaginative involvement.

Limitations

  • Relied on self-reported recall, not real-time tracking.
  • Sample limited to U.S. college students.
  • Data collected during COVID, when consecutive viewing may have been more common.

Funding

The authors reported no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication.

Publication Information

Baldwin, J., Ulusoy, E., Durfee, M., Busselle, R., & Ewoldsen, D.R. (2025). Watching one more episode and reading one more chapter: What entertainment contexts lead to retrospective imaginative involvement? Acta Psychologica, 257, 105101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105101

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

  1. BPK says:

    This is fascinating, and I recently proved it as true. I originally watched the series “Silo” when it came out in weekly installments. Though I had read the books and was positively inclined and looking forward to the show immensely, I found in weekly installments I did not remember it as well; could not relate it at well to the book, and was a lot more critical of it, even though in generally I liked it.

    Now, I just finished binge-watching the first two seasons of “Silo” again and not only did I see things in it that I had missed in the first viewing, but it connected together so much better and was far more enjoyable. “Silo” is a totally brilliant series, with two more seasons to go. All aspects of it are so well done ( as so many AppleTV+ series ) the acting, special effects ( not overly reliant on special effects ) the directions, and particularly the plot and the writing.

    After binge watching the first two seasons again I would rate “Silo” as 10/10 and recommend it to any adult interested in plot directed science fiction.