Bored at concert

Around 10% of people score very low in musical reward sensitivity. (Image by StudyFinds using Shutterstock AI Image Generator)

For a small group of people, music is just background noise. Neuroscience may explain why

In A Nutshell

  • Some people genuinely feel no pleasure from music, despite having normal hearing and enjoying other rewards like food or money.
  • The condition, known as specific musical anhedonia, appears to stem from a disconnect between brain regions that process sound and those that process reward.
  • Roughly 10% of people score very low on musical reward sensitivity, though only a subset meet criteria for the specific condition.
  • Brain imaging studies show reduced activity in reward centers when these individuals hear music, and genetic research suggests over half of this trait may be inherited.
  • Scientists emphasize this is a variation in brain wiring—not a disorder—and it challenges the idea that music is universally rewarding.

BARCELONA — At weddings, concerts, and karaoke nights, most people can’t help but move to the beat or feel a rush when their favorite song plays. But there’s a small group who feel nothing. Not boredom, not dislike, just nothing. And according to a growing body of brain research, it’s not because they haven’t found the right song.

Some people experience what scientists call specific musical anhedonia, a condition where music doesn’t trigger pleasure, even though the person has normal hearing and experiences joy from other things like food, social connection, or money.

A newly published review article in Trends in Cognitive Sciences pulls together years of research from multiple labs and countries to explain what’s going on. The findings suggest that in certain people, the brain’s reward system simply doesn’t respond to music the way it does for most. It’s not broken, it’s just disconnected from the parts that process sound.

A woman is bored at a rock concert
For some people, music doesn’t trigger the brain’s reward system like it does for most others. (Photo by StudyFinds using Shutterstock AI Image Generator)

What Specific Musical Anhedonia Research Says So Far

Scientists studying musical pleasure use a tool called the Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ), a survey that measures how people react to music in emotional, physical, and social ways. It asks how often someone gets chills from songs, whether they feel like moving to the beat, and if they use music to improve their mood or connect with others.

Across global samples, researchers consistently find that about 10 percent of people score very low on music reward sensitivity. But those scores alone don’t define specific musical anhedonia. To qualify, individuals must also show normal responses to other kinds of rewards and have no music perception problems like tone deafness. They hear music just fine, it simply doesn’t feel rewarding.

To understand what’s happening in the brain, researchers have used functional MRI (fMRI) to observe brain activity while people listen to pleasant music. In most listeners, one key area involved in reward and pleasure, the nucleus accumbens, lights up. But in people with specific musical anhedonia, that area shows reduced activity. Not completely silent, but clearly less responsive.

Importantly, these same people do show normal brain responses to other types of rewards, like the anticipation of money. That pattern supports the idea that their reward systems are working, but music isn’t reaching it.

A Disconnected Pathway

So how does music usually reach the reward center? That’s where diffusion MRI comes in. This brain imaging technique maps the white matter pathways, or the “wiring” that connects brain regions. Studies show that people with specific musical anhedonia have weaker structural connections between the auditory cortex (which processes sound) and reward-related areas like the nucleus accumbens. A key hub in this system is the orbitofrontal cortex, which helps assign value to sensory input.

Rather than being damaged or underdeveloped, these areas seem less well-connected. That may explain why people with this condition can detect melody, rhythm, and harmony, but those sounds don’t produce a meaningful emotional response.

In some cases, researchers have explored noninvasive brain stimulation as a way to influence these circuits. While still early, studies show that stimulating parts of the reward network correlates with changes in how music is experienced. The review notes that these stimulation techniques have been linked to enhancements in music-induced pleasure, but it doesn’t suggest that the underlying brain wiring is permanently changed.

Woman listening to music and dancing on her couch
Most people tend to have an emotional response to the music they love listening to, but this doesn’t happen for people with specific musical anhedonia. (Photo by Prostock-studio on Shutterstock)

How Common Is Specific Musical Anhedonia and When Does It Start?

The review highlights data showing that musical reward sensitivity varies widely across people and may have genetic roots. A twin study found that about 54 percent of the variability in people’s enjoyment of music could be explained by genetic factors. Even more notably, most of those genetic effects were independent of genes related to general reward sensitivity or musical perception skills.

Another study used a version of the BMRQ adapted for children aged 3 to 7, as rated by their parents. This research found wide variation in music-reward sensitivity even in early childhood, suggesting that differences in how people respond to music may start very young.

Different Types of Musical Anhedonia

The review outlines three types of people who may score low on music reward questionnaires:

  1. Those with music perception deficits, such as difficulty detecting pitch or rhythm (commonly called tone deafness).
  2. Those with general anhedonia, meaning they experience little pleasure from any reward, not just music.
  3. Those with specific musical anhedonia, who have no problems perceiving music or enjoying other rewards, but find music emotionally flat.

Even within this last group, there are interesting nuances. Some people with musical anhedonia still show a strong urge to move to music, even if they don’t enjoy it emotionally. This suggests that movement and emotional pleasure may be processed along different brain circuits.

Music and Mental Health: Not Always a Universal Tool

One especially relevant piece of evidence comes from a study conducted during the COVID-19 lockdown. For many people, music became a key coping tool, helping with mood regulation, social connection, and entertainment.

But the review points out that those who scored high on certain music-reward dimensions, like music seeking or mood regulation, were more likely to change their listening behavior during lockdown. They listened more, explored new genres, and turned to virtual concerts. People who scored lower on those scales were less likely to engage with music in those ways, though the paper does not claim they made no changes at all.

These individual differences also shaped mental health outcomes: reward sensitivity appeared to mediate the link between music use and depressive symptoms. In other words, those who naturally respond to music more intensely may have gained more emotional benefit during a stressful period.

Where the Research Is Headed

The authors of the review are careful to note that the field is still developing. Much of the data comes from relatively small brain imaging samples. Many questions remain about how stable musical anhedonia is across time, how it might change with age, and whether it can be modified through therapy or training.

There’s also a call for deeper investigation into other forms of specific anhedonia. If music-specific reward circuits can be disconnected, could similar patterns exist for taste, social touch, or visual beauty? Understanding these circuits might eventually help explain—and perhaps treat—conditions like depression, which often involve a more general inability to feel pleasure.

Music is often described as a universal language. But for some people, it might as well be silence. Their ears work, their hearts feel joy in other settings, but melodies and rhythms don’t light up their brains. That insight doesn’t just challenge common assumptions about musical taste; it forces a reconsideration of what pleasure even means, and how it’s wired into the brain.


Paper Summary

Methodology

The paper is a review of current research on individual differences in musical reward sensitivity, especially focusing on a condition known as specific musical anhedonia. It summarizes findings from studies using the Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ), functional and diffusion MRI scans, behavioral tasks involving other types of rewards (like money), and a large twin study. It also includes research on children using a version of the BMRQ adapted for parental ratings.

Results

Around 10% of people score very low in musical reward sensitivity. Some of these individuals—who show normal hearing and enjoyment of other rewards—are classified as having specific musical anhedonia. Their brain scans reveal reduced activation in the nucleus accumbens in response to music, and weaker white-matter connections between auditory and reward-processing regions. Brain stimulation has been shown to correlate with enhancements in musical pleasure, and a twin study found that 54% of the trait is heritable. The condition may start in early childhood and reflects a disconnect, not a deficit in perception or intelligence.

Limitations

The field is still emerging, and many of the included studies had small sample sizes, especially in imaging research. Long-term changes and treatment options are unknown. The review also notes that more work is needed to understand the developmental trajectory of musical reward sensitivity and its interaction with mental health.

Funding and Disclosures

Research cited in the review was funded by the European Regional Development Fund, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Government of Catalonia, Canada Research Chair program, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and others. The authors declared no competing interests.

Publication Info

Mas-Herrero, E., Zatorre, R.J., & Marco-Pallarés, J. (2025). “Understanding individual differences to specific rewards through music.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

4 Comments

  1. william wesley says:

    The trouble with nearly all formal music research is that formal music is not the greatest instance of the use of music, rather the greatest instance of music is the music of voice used to communicate emotion while speaking, and in all languages.
    https://youtu.be/6Zr9BU0bJoc?t=1
    The question is framed as “do people get pleasure from music?” but that is not the most pertinent question. the much more pertinent question is “do people recognize emotion in music?”
    We can recognize the emotion in music that gives us DISPLEASURE. Movies are full of grating harsh unpleasant music that conveys the emotion of grating harsh unpleasant scenes, yet we like the movie specifically FOR the extra drama provided by the unpleasant sound track..
    A person who could not recognize the emotion in music would not be able to recognize the emotion in music of voice of other persons when they speak and worse they would not be able to speak with music of voice to express their own emotions which is very very unlikely.
    One must carefully moderate against unwarranted assumptions in science and the idea that all music is pleasant and for evoking pleasure only is totally unwarranted!
    The description of the research states that PLEASANT music was provided which automatically disqualifies the experiment since many persons like unpleasant music and find unpleasant emotions just as meaningful as pleasant emotions, such as for example the music used to heighten the emotion in tragic movies, violent movies and in horror movies.
    If we cherry pick our assumptions and without questioning them we are not participating in science, we are obfuscating science.

  2. Paul says:

    Basically, 10% of humans tested improbably had souls that didn’t belong to them, most likely hates wine, spicy foods, vveed and garlic. Got it.

    1. just a wanderer says:

      Not even a good joke. Besides I put habanero jelly on my morning toast.