Woman with depression crying

Photo by Claudia Wolff on Unsplash

In A Nutshell

  • Researchers interviewed 80 U.S. adults about times they could or could not forgive themselves for past mistakes.
  • Those unable to forgive themselves described painful memories as if they were happening “just like yesterday,” while forgivers focused more on the future.
  • People stuck in guilt often swung between blaming themselves too much and trying to shift responsibility, while forgivers balanced accountability with acceptance of human limits.
  • Coping styles made a big difference: avoidance (work, distractions, risky activities) kept guilt alive, while “working through” painful emotions led to healing and peace.

ADELAIDE, Australia — That harsh inner voice whispering “I’ll never forgive myself for this” isn’t just dramatic flair. For many people, it can feel like a psychological prison — a cycle of self-blame and regret that’s hard to escape. New research identifies why some remain stuck in endless condemnation while others eventually find a way to forgive themselves, offering insights that could help break the cycle of guilt.

Researchers examined the deeply personal accounts of 80 Americans who shared their most painful experiences of failure, betrayal, and wrongdoing. The results, published in Self and Identity, paint a vivid picture of two psychological worlds: one where past mistakes still feel fresh and overwhelming, and another where people have learned to carry regrets without being crushed by them.

The study, conducted by psychologist Lydia Woodyatt and colleagues at Flinders University and the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, adds a new perspective to the body of research on self-forgiveness. One of its most eye-opening discoveries is how differently people experience the passage of time when it comes to their worst moments.

How Painful Memories Keep Some People Stuck in the Past

“It is a raw feeling. Just like it happened yesterday, but I moved my daughter 4 years ago” (P.20, 49-years, White Female), wrote one participant who couldn’t forgive herself after her daughter was bullied at school. Another shared that despite 20 years passing, “I still feel awful.” For people stuck in self-condemnation, painful memories don’t fade — they replay with the same emotional intensity as when they first occurred.

Participants described their mistakes as “playing over in my mind a lot” and feeling “all the emotions all over again.”

In contrast, people who had reached self-forgiveness described a shift toward the future. “I had to let it go to move on with my life,” one participant explained. Another admitted, “I feel regretful about it still, but it is not all-consuming like it used to be.”

Self-forgiveness isn’t about erasing regret entirely. It’s about changing its intensity and meaning. Those who forgave themselves reported mixed emotions rather than being overwhelmed by shame.

Man Alone On Couch, Sad, Stressed
(Credit: Nik Shuliahin on Unsplash)

The Mental Tug-of-War Over Personal Responsibility

Perhaps the most intriguing finding involves how people handle responsibility. Participants struggling with self-forgiveness often experienced what researchers call vacillation, essentially a mental seesaw between taking all the blame and trying to shift it elsewhere.

“I tried to stop thinking about it and telling myself it wasn’t my fault. Because if I was just a little more persistent then he was about driving drunk then he wouldn’t have gotten in the accident,” wrote one participant who blamed himself for a friend’s drunk driving crash. This inner conflict of simultaneously accepting and rejecting responsibility prevents resolution.

Those who achieved self-forgiveness found a different path: accepting responsibility while also recognizing their human limitations. “The only real barrier to forgiving was coming to the conclusion that things don’t always work out the way you want them to,” one participant explained.

When Caring for Others Makes Guilt Worse

The study revealed a painful pattern among people responsible for others. Parents, adult children of aging parents, and people in helping roles often experienced intensified guilt when something went wrong under their watch.

Several participants shared devastating stories of feeling responsible for suicides of loved ones. One wrote: “She would still be here if I didn’t break it off. I’ve been to therapy, I’ve tried all kinds of things. Nothing has helped.” Another described their father’s suicide: “I ignored the warning signs of severe depression that he was expressing weeks before the incident. I loved my father and he deserved to have someone there to help him during his lowest moments.”

This heightened sense of responsibility can make self-forgiveness feel impossible, even when people may not truly be at fault.

The Core Identity Question Behind Self-Blame

At its core, the inability to forgive oneself stems from a haunting question: “Am I a good person who did a bad thing, or am I actually a bad person?”

“I never thought I was the kind of person who would ever cheat,” wrote one participant who kissed another person while engaged. This shattering of self-concept occurs when people discover they were capable of behavior they once saw as unthinkable.

Those who found self-forgiveness learned to accept themselves as flawed but still decent. They often recommitted to the values they had violated, using mistakes as motivation to improve rather than as evidence of inherent badness.

The study also revealed that people sometimes struggled to forgive themselves for being victims. Participants who stayed in abusive relationships or missed warning signs experienced the same crushing self-condemnation as those who had caused harm. “I stayed in an abusive relationship for far too long after realizing I was in one,” one participant admitted.

Two Completely Different Ways of Coping With Guilt

The research uncovered a key difference in how people coped with guilt. Those unable to forgive themselves often used avoidance: working longer hours, playing video games, or even taking on risky jobs to distract themselves. “When the guilt gets unbearable I will do manual labor or dangerous jobs that require my full attention,” one participant revealed.

But avoidance only offers temporary relief. Research shows that trying to suppress painful thoughts often makes them stronger and more intrusive.

By contrast, people who achieved self-forgiveness allowed themselves to feel the pain while working through it. One participant described: “i pretty much sat and thought about it all day long for days and racked my brain on how things could have gone differently. I realized there was nothing that could be done now so I tried my best to get past the situation.”

Another said of an instance of infidelity: “It took several months to reach the point of forgiveness with myself. I had to do a lot of soul-searching, looking into the dynamics of the relationship I strayed from. Now I feel as though it was a learning experience.”

Though more difficult at first, this process of “working through” ultimately led to peace. The key difference wasn’t the specific strategy, but whether people engaged with their emotions or tried to avoid them.

For people who feel trapped in self-condemnation, this research offers both hope and a roadmap. The path forward isn’t about forgetting or minimizing harm done, but about learning to carry regret without being crushed by it.

Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a peer-reviewed psychology study. The research is qualitative and based on 80 participants in the United States. Results should not be taken as universal or prescriptive. If you struggle with guilt or self-condemnation, consider speaking with a licensed mental health professional.

Paper Summary

Methodology

Researchers recruited 80 American adults through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform. Participants ranged in age from 21 to 79 years (average 36), with 53.8% female. The sample was ethnically diverse, with 68.8% White/Caucasian, 10% Black/African American, 7.5% Asian, and 8.8% Hispanic. Participants recalled either a time when they forgave themselves or when they were unable to forgive themselves, then answered open-ended questions about the experience.

The team conducted reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006, 2020) and complemented this with a coding reliability framework, using multiple coders and calculating inter-rater consistency (κ=.66) to strengthen confidence in the themes identified.

Results

Four major themes distinguished those unable to self-forgive from those who could:

  1. Past as present — painful memories remained immediate for some, while others shifted focus to the future.
  2. Agency — some vacillated between over-blame and defensiveness, while forgivers balanced responsibility with human limits.
  3. Social-moral identity — self-condemners couldn’t reconcile actions with being a “good person,” while forgivers accepted imperfection.
  4. Coping strategies — self-condemners avoided pain, while forgivers worked through it.
    Subthemes included heightened responsibility in caregiving roles and self-blame among victims.

Limitations

The study involved only U.S.-based, English-proficient participants, which limits generalizability. The analysis relied on self-reported memories, and interpretations were shaped by researchers’ perspectives. The authors note that while this perspective is a limitation, their expertise also adds theoretical depth, and they reflected on and challenged their own preconceptions throughout the process.

Disclosures

The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.

Publication Information

Published online June 3, 2025, in Self and Identity (Vol. 24, Issue 6, pp. 628–647). Authors: Lydia Woodyatt, Melissa de Vel-Palumbo, Anna Barron, Christiana Harous, Michael Wenzel, and Shannon de Silva. DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2025.2513878.

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply