More adults being diagnosed as neurodivergent. What does it mean for modern workplaces?

Written by Dougal Sutherland, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington

There has been a rise in the number of people diagnosed with “neurodivergence” in adulthood over the past decade. This trend has been noted internationally: As many as 8% of adults globally could have some form of neurodivergence.

Neurodivergence is an umbrella term that typically includes autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and specific learning disorders (SLD) – sometimes referred to as dyslexia.

The rise in these diagnoses when people are already in the workforce presents a challenge for employers. Business owners can be left wondering how they can support neurodivergent employees without causing issues for the wider business.

‘Childhood’ diagnoses now part of adulthood

Historically, diagnoses were predominantly made in children, with the view that people “grew out” of them as they developed into adults

But research over the past decade indicates the majority of people with these conditions continue to experience symptoms throughout their adult life, albeit in different ways to childhood.

Understanding neurodivergence is underpinned by the view that ASD, ADHD, and SLD reflect differences in how a person’s brain is “wired” rather than being an underlying “disorder.”

This changing view appears to have increased awareness of neurodivergence. It has also reduced the stigma associated with it, leading more people to seek support as adults.

A limited understanding of gender differences in the way neurodivergence is expressed, as well as limited access to psychological and psychiatric assessments in the public sector, have likely contributed to significant numbers of people missing out on childhood diagnoses. Many are now seeking assistance in adulthood.

Neurodivergence in the workplace

This rising tide of adults seeking to better understand their differences – and potentially seek treatment – has presented challenges for businesses and employers.

But employers need not fear hiring those who are neurodivergent. Viewing neurodivergence as a difference rather than a disability contributes to an inclusive workplace where people’s strengths are recognized and celebrated.

Some people with ADHD, for example, work very effectively in a fast-paced environment with tight deadlines and rapidly changing content, such as journalism. People with ASD often have very specialized areas of interest that, if matched to the right work environment, can lead them to be experts in their fields.

But it would be naive to say neurodivergence doesn’t bring with it some challenges for individuals and their workplaces. A person with ADHD may appear quite disorganized to others (and to themselves) and at times, “put their foot in their mouth” through impulsively saying something they haven’t fully thought through.

Those with ASD often report challenges in navigating social relationships at work or may have particular sensory sensitivities (finding the general hubbub of open-plan offices anxiety-provoking, for example). They may struggle to process large amounts of written or verbal information, resulting in confusion and anxiety.

Businesses need awareness

Businesses and organizations looking to support neurodivergence in the workplace should initially focus on increasing awareness and understanding among leaders and managers.

Managers need to work with individual staff who have self-identified as neurodivergent to understand and implement what is needed to support them.

There may be some very practical steps that can be taken, such as having designated low-stimulus areas, providing noise-canceling headphones, or understanding how best to communicate clearly and simply with an individual. Some staff may wish to take up psychological support via their workplace to help them develop skills in areas they find difficult.

Technically, neurodivergence is likely to fall under the Employment Relations Act, which prohibits businesses from discriminating against people with these conditions. Indeed, the legislation requires an employer to make reasonable allowances in the workplace.

Perhaps the worst thing an employer can do is overlook neurodivergence as being present in the workplace. Ignorance, whether wilful or not, will lead to inaction.

That said, it would also be a mistake for an employer to unilaterally refer a staff member for an assessment of suspected neurodivergence. To suggest someone is neurodivergent and requires a psychological assessment may lead to personal distress and potentially breach employment law.

Employers should also be aware of the lengthy and complicated pathway to an adult diagnosis due to factors such as lack of clear adult diagnostic criteria and shortage of trained clinicians. Employers can support staff in this process by allowing flexibility in work hours to attend specialist appointments or even funding access to assessments in the private sector.

The rise of awareness about neurodivergence mirrors the rise in awareness of mental health conditions in the workplace generally.

Although this increased visibility can be confusing for some staff and organizations, recognition and understanding of neurodivergence can only be good for businesses in the long term.

Helping people operate to their full potential by understanding their strengths and challenges will ultimately lead to thriving and productive workplaces.

Dougal Sutherland is a clinical psychologist at Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Follow on Google News

About the Author

The Conversation

The Conversation is a nonprofit news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of academic experts for the public. The Conversation’s team of 21 editors works with researchers to help them explain their work clearly and without jargon.

The contents of this website do not constitute advice and are provided for informational purposes only. See our full disclaimer


  1. Either Americans are genetically inferior, or culturally inferior or both.

    Which is it?

    1. All the Nintendo babies growing up
      With nothing else to do but be
      Attention deficit.

    2. Since “it takes one to know one,” that would make you a genetically and culturally inferior anti-American keyboard warrior. Oh, the irony!

    1. How can you force a behaviour upon someone whose brain is hardwired in a different manner? We are talking about the people who program your computers and design your electronics.

    2. Actually in ADHD individuals the frontal lobe is underdeveloped. Completely not their fault.

  2. Dyslexia is one type of SLP. This artical has many other inaccuracies in it. I’ve been a psychologist for almost 3 decades and specialize in testing for these disorders, and others.

  3. There may be a generational increase in Neurodivergent individuals based upon historical trends. However this increase is probably more to better comprehension of the large spectrum of human abilities and capacities and when a diagnosis is relevant. I have worked with many Neurodivergent individuals as their special skills and limitations will direct them to everything from engineering to paving roads. There are some which will need assistance but the biggest thing is always the same: communicate clearly in a positive and constructive manner.

  4. Find me an industry that stands to gain financial benefits from coming up with new “disorders” requiring people to ingest brain-altering drugs and attend therapy for the next 25 years, and I’ll show you the entire psychiatric and psycholigical segments of American society

  5. “Some people with ADHD, for example, work very effectively in a fast-paced environment with tight deadlines and rapidly changing content, such as journalism.”

    “Helping people operate to their full potential by understanding their strengths and challenges will ultimately lead to thriving and productive workplaces.”

    Remember, many of these are the same ones who could not sit still for the k-12 education.
    The solution from the article seems to be employer provided training rather than employee interest in doing the work.

  6. Well I bet there is a really expensive pill to treat it just around the corner. Neurodivergents have rights too! We were on our way to shut down the bridge to protest and increase awareness, but got distracted by the pretty birds and clouds that looked like elephants.

  7. Businesses did this to themselves. They made up ridiculous requirements and clearly didn’t want to pay previous gens or treat them fairly, so younger gens responded rationally. Birthrates need to continue to decline before any semblance of normalcy ever returns to the market, and honestly the post-Reagan economic policies just make no sense. We need to return to 50s and 60s era policies that made America the greatest nation in the world. Obviously we want to improve on that too for the modern time period, but we’ve actively been going backwards since then.

  8. Since “it takes one to know one,” that would make you a genetically and culturally inferior anti-American keyboard warrior. Oh, the irony!

  9. Why are you lumping together conditions that share no similarities- have completely different DSM criteria. Studies are just finding now that Autism might last a life time? That is a plain wrong statement. Autism is by definition life long.

Comments are closed.