cardmapr-XH2JFgT4Abc-unsplash

Photo by CardMapr on Unsplash

ATHENS, Ga. — There’s nothing quite like holding a wad of cash, but researchers from the University of Georgia conclude that average American families would be far better off if the U.S. eliminates all paper money. There’s one catch however, which is that the government also needs to lower certain taxes.

The gist of the study is that if America phases out cash money, the Internal Revenue Service will need to lower or even eliminate some taxes due to less tax evasion. Researchers explain that physical currency can change hands without Uncle Sam finding out. The same can’t be said for credit card and online transactions.

“Our analysis of the costs and benefits of proposals to eliminate currency implies that doing away with big bills like $50s and $100s could benefit the average person, even though they like using cash,” says study co-author William D. Lastrapes, the Bernard B. and Eugenia A. Ramsey Chair of Private Enterprise in the Terry College of Business, in a university release. “Less cash means less tax evasion, so the government can reduce other taxes.”

Without tax relief, cash is still king

Study authors used a technique called macroeconomic modeling to predict how eliminating cash money may change Americans’ lives.

The model largely works by looking for trade-offs. For example, when people use cash to hide their income and avoid taxes, it results in the government losing out on funds that could go towards public services or to pay down government debt. Simultaneously, however, tax avoidance through cash also essentially lowers tax rates for consumers and businesses – ultimately leading to greater capital and productivity.

So, while the government obviously does not approve of tax evasion via paper money, this practice can actually provide a boost to the greater economy.

When researchers applied their model to a scenario with no more paper money, the predictions show Americans would be far worse off. People would have to report every single cent of their income, which would be great for the government but not so much for public productivity and privacy.

Importantly, however, study authors report that if the government also reduced statutory income tax rates it would offset the disappearance of cash. In fact, the model concludes the average American household would be better off financially.

Low-income Americans may still struggle

It’s essential to note that these conclusions apply only to the average, middle-class American family. Researchers say if their model factors in lower-income households, which are often more dependent on cash, the outlook wouldn’t be as positive. Still, the research team believes there are ways the government could step in and help lower-income families.

“You’re going to have to provide them with some offset,” Lastrapes concludes. “What we’re suggesting is to take cash away but reduce taxes. It turns out this more than just compensates for not having cash, but it can actually make people better off.”

“My co-authors and I will be the first to admit that our paper does not provide the final word on cash-suppression policies and that more research is needed to be confident in what should be done. But our view is that models like ours that account for many of the unintended consequences of such policies and that carefully measure overall costs and benefits are essential for determining the right path.”

The study appears in the journal European Economic Review.

About John Anderer

Born blue in the face, John has been writing professionally for over a decade and covering the latest scientific research for StudyFinds since 2019. His work has been featured by Business Insider, Eat This Not That!, MSN, Ladders, and Yahoo!

Studies and abstracts can be confusing and awkwardly worded. He prides himself on making such content easy to read, understand, and apply to one’s everyday life.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

2 Comments

  1. DANIEL BUBLITZ says:

    Since the start of the year until July, DeFi-related hacks totaled $361 million — an increase of nearly three times from all of 2020, according to cryptocurrency compliance company CipherTrace.
    NORTH KOREA STOLE 650 MILLION! AND IN 2014 STOLL MILLIONS FROM SONY!
    THE LIST GOES ON AND ON!

  2. Miami Mike says:

    Cashless economy: “If you haff nossing to hide, you have nossing to fear.” Herman Goering, career terminated 1945.

    Half this country hates Trump, half this country hates Biden. We are therefore guaranteed that half the country will NOT give up cash no matter who is president. “No cash” equals 100% government control – so far, this is America, not a totalitarian dictatorship where entire groups of people can be exterminated because the government deems them undesirable. Just imagine how YOU could live (or not) if suddenly you had zero access to money, no food, no home, not even a chance to leave unless you walk or swim.

    I am by no means paranoid (no ammo stash, no MREs, etc.) but I do NOT have faith in the ongoing benevolence of a government. Look at DeSantis in Florida – if he could starve out anyone who disagrees with him, he would.

    Further, if there were no cash, no currency, people would find other things to trade with, and none of them would be taxable or traceable at all.

    What do you plan to do about the millions of people who don’t have computers? Digital money requires a computer and a working internet connection, and we are not automatically on-line at birth.