sharon-mccutcheon-4jLj-GdRn_A-unsplash

Photo by Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash

SÃO PAULO, Brazil — Festive glitter, a common ingredient in makeup, greeting cards, and holiday decorations, may have a darker side than its shiny surface suggests. Researchers from the University of São Paulo (USP) in Brazil have found that glitter can negatively impact aquatic organisms vital to underwater ecosystems, with several million metric tons winding up in the oceans.

Popular in various products, from nail polish to Carnival costumes, glitter’s persistence isn’t just annoying for those trying to wash it off. Composed of microplastics – tiny particles smaller than five mm, typically made from materials like polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) – these glitters are coated with aluminum for a shimmering effect. The issue is these microplastics are too minuscule for wastewater treatment plants to filter out, leading to an alarming estimate of over eight million metric tons of glitter ending up in our oceans recently.

Since glitter doesn’t break down naturally, it poses several threats to aquatic life: ingestion, contact with its toxic ingredients, and injury from its sharp edges. Glitter’s unique size, shape, and makeup make it difficult to measure how much is contaminating our waters.

Scientists analyzed glitter’s effects on two types of cyanobacteria or blue-green algae, which are fundamental to aquatic ecosystems. These algae contribute to water and soil cycles and serve as food for other organisms.

glitter in water
Cultured cyanobacteria containing glitter particles (photo: University of São Paulo/researchers’ archive)

Using advanced techniques, scientists assessed the growth of these algae when exposed to varying glitter concentrations.

“We found that increasing the amount of glitter raised the biovolume of the cyanobacterial cells and boosted stress to levels that even impaired photosynthesis,” says study first author Mauricio Junior Machado, a researcher in CENA-USP’s Cellular and Molecular Biology Laboratory, in a media release. “The toxicity of glitter for microorganisms has hardly been studied at all. Whatever affects cyanobacteria will indirectly affect other organisms in the same environment.”

Exposure to certain levels of glitter severely impacted the growth rates of these algae. The negative effects became most pronounced on the 21st day of their experiment.

“Glitter is sold for use in festivities, where people spare little thought for the environmental problems it causes,” notes study last author Marli de Fátima Fiore. “However, it’s necessary to bear in mind that microplastics contaminate and damage marine and freshwater ecosystems, which are extremely important to our lives, and to think about campaigns to avoid microplastic pollution as much as possible.”

The team plans to continue their research, testing the effects on other types of cyanobacteria and investigating if “biodegradable” glitter is genuinely less harmful to aquatic life.

The study is published in the journal Aquatic Toxicology.

You might also be interested in:

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Chris Melore

Editor

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor