Exhausted millennial man sleeping on his office desk, next to laptop and documents, tired of overworking

(© Prostock-studio - stock.adobe.com)

MINNEAPOLIS — If you feel constantly tired during the day, it could be a sign of a rare sleep disorder that’s more common than scientists previously believed. A team with the American Academy of Neurology believes that more people may unknowingly have idiopathic hypersomnia, a disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness.

Idiopathic hypersomnia is a neurological condition that causes individuals to feel extremely sleepy during the day, even after a good night’s sleep. Symptoms include prolonged sleep periods, difficulty waking up, and disorientation upon waking. This condition differs from narcolepsy, where individuals also experience daytime sleepiness but typically do not sleep excessively and may feel refreshed after napping.

“It has been difficult to determine the prevalence of idiopathic hypersomnia because expensive and time-consuming sleep testing is required to make a diagnosis,” says study author Dr. David Plante, from the University of Wisconsin–Madison, in a media release. “We examined data from a large sleep study and found that this condition is much more common than previous estimates, and as prevalent as some other common neurologic and psychiatric conditions such as epilepsy, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.”

The study involved 792 participants with an average age of 59, who underwent an overnight sleep study and a daytime nap study. The nap study measures how quickly a person falls asleep over several naps. Participants also provided information about their daytime sleepiness, fatigue, napping habits, and sleep duration on work and non-work nights.

Researchers found that 12 participants had probable cases of idiopathic hypersomnia, representing a prevalence of 1.5 percent. Those with the disorder showed more severe sleepiness despite similar or longer sleep durations compared to those without the condition. On a sleepiness survey where scores above 10 are cause for concern, individuals with idiopathic hypersomnia averaged a score of 14, while others averaged a score of nine.

Red-haired girl sitting at table with boring face
(© contrastwerkstatt – stock.adobe.com)

Sleep studies revealed that those with idiopathic hypersomnia fell asleep in about four minutes at night and six minutes during naps, in contrast to averages of 13 and 12 minutes, respectively, for those without the disorder. Over an average of 12 years, researchers observed that excessive daytime sleepiness was often a chronic issue for individuals with idiopathic hypersomnia. However, 40 percent of the studied individuals experienced a remission of sleepiness.

“Our results demonstrate that idiopathic hypersomnia is relatively common, more prevalent than generally assumed, so there is likely a sizable difference between the number of people with this disorder and those who seek treatment,” notes Dr. Plante. “Further efforts to identify, diagnose and treat those impaired by idiopathic hypersomnia are needed. Additional research may also clarify the causes of idiopathic hypersomnia and lead to new treatments.”

The study authors acknowledge some limitations of their work, including that participants were all employed, which might affect the outcomes. The condition could be even more prevalent in unemployed populations, as those with idiopathic hypersomnia have higher rates of job loss and disability.

Funding for the study was provided by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, which manufactures a treatment for idiopathic hypersomnia, along with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Center for Research Resources at the National Institutes of Health. Plante has served as a consultant for Jazz Pharmaceuticals. The study asserts that funders did not influence the research process or findings.

The study is published in the journal Neurology.

You might also be interested in: 

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply